CBOE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Coinbase Global has a net margin of 20.7% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 6.26%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 19.48% beat Coinbase Global's return on equity of 20.89%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $210.40, signalling upside risk potential of 9.02%. On the other hand Coinbase Global has an analysts' consensus of $291.84 which suggests that it could grow by 13.01%. Given that Coinbase Global has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Coinbase Global is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.968% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Coinbase Global has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Coinbase Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 29.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Coinbase Global pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cboe Global Markets's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Coinbase Global quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $218.5M is higher than Coinbase Global's net income of $75.5M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.29x while Coinbase Global's PE ratio is 43.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.16x versus 13.83x for Coinbase Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intercontinental Exchange has a net margin of 20.7% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 21.66%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 19.48% beat Intercontinental Exchange's return on equity of 9.23%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $210.40, signalling upside risk potential of 9.02%. On the other hand Intercontinental Exchange has an analysts' consensus of $181.69 which suggests that it could grow by 23.96%. Given that Intercontinental Exchange has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Intercontinental Exchange is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.968% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intercontinental Exchange has a beta of 1.096, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 9.631%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Intercontinental Exchange offers a yield of 1.23% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 29.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Intercontinental Exchange pays out 40.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Intercontinental Exchange quarterly revenues of $3B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $218.5M is lower than Intercontinental Exchange's net income of $657M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.29x while Intercontinental Exchange's PE ratio is 34.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.16x versus 7.40x for Intercontinental Exchange. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nasdaq has a net margin of 20.7% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 16.09%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 19.48% beat Nasdaq's return on equity of 9.57%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $210.40, signalling upside risk potential of 9.02%. On the other hand Nasdaq has an analysts' consensus of $85.67 which suggests that it could grow by 9.8%. Given that Nasdaq has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe Nasdaq is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.968% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nasdaq has a beta of 0.979, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.098%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. Nasdaq offers a yield of 1.21% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 29.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Nasdaq pays out 41.64% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Nasdaq quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $218.5M is lower than Nasdaq's net income of $306M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.29x while Nasdaq's PE ratio is 46.72x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.16x versus 6.36x for Nasdaq. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

S&P Global has a net margin of 20.7% compared to Cboe Global Markets's net margin of 27.16%. Cboe Global Markets's return on equity of 19.48% beat S&P Global's return on equity of 9.21%.

Cboe Global Markets has a consensus price target of $210.40, signalling upside risk potential of 9.02%. On the other hand S&P Global has an analysts' consensus of $580.68 which suggests that it could grow by 17.11%. Given that S&P Global has higher upside potential than Cboe Global Markets, analysts believe S&P Global is more attractive than Cboe Global Markets.

Cboe Global Markets has a beta of 0.680, which suggesting that the stock is 31.968% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison S&P Global has a beta of 1.196, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 19.565%.

Cboe Global Markets has a quarterly dividend of $0.63 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.22%. S&P Global offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.91 per share. Cboe Global Markets pays 29.35% of its earnings as a dividend. S&P Global pays out 43.68% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cboe Global Markets quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than S&P Global quarterly revenues of $3.6B. Cboe Global Markets's net income of $218.5M is lower than S&P Global's net income of $971M. Notably, Cboe Global Markets's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.29x while S&P Global's PE ratio is 43.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cboe Global Markets is 5.16x versus 11.30x for S&P Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.