Is Uber Stock a Buy on the Dip?
Shares of Uber Technologies (NYSE:UBER) have been fading fast in…
Sell
33
FLOT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$50.87
Seasonality move
:
-0.05%
Day range:
$50.85 - $50.87
52-week range:
$50.28 - $51.16
Dividend yield:
5.82%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
971.5K
Avg. volume:
1.1M
1-year change:
0.59%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
$50.87 | -- | -- | -- | $0.23 | 5.82% | -- |
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
$30.73 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 5.67% | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
$25.42 | -- | -- | -- | $0.11 | 5.93% | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
$50.07 | -- | -- | -- | $0.20 | 5.32% | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
$100.66 | -- | -- | -- | $0.42 | 5.27% | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
$75.12 | -- | -- | -- | $0.32 | 5.34% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -0.015 | -- | -- |
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -0.002 | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -0.015 | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | 0.087 | -- | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
-- | 0.004 | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | 0.039 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
FLOT
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLRN
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FLTR
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GSY
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
RAVI
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns FLOT or FLRN?
SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLOT or FLRN?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has higher upside potential than SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF, analysts believe iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is more attractive than SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLOT or FLRN More Risky?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 93.019% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.080, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.028%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLOT or FLRN?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.82%. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF offers a yield of 5.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLOT or FLRN?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is -- versus -- for SPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -- FLRNSPDR Bloomberg Investment Grade Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLOT or FLTR?
VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLOT or FLTR?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has higher upside potential than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF, analysts believe iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is more attractive than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLOT or FLTR More Risky?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 93.019% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF has a beta of 0.094, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.566%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLOT or FLTR?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.82%. VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF offers a yield of 5.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.11 per share. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLOT or FLTR?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is -- versus -- for VanEck IG Floating Rate ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -- FLTRVanEck IG Floating Rate ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLOT or GSY?
Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLOT or GSY?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has higher upside potential than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF, analysts believe iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is more attractive than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF0 0 0 -
Is FLOT or GSY More Risky?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 93.019% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF has a beta of 0.114, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 88.58%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLOT or GSY?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.82%. Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF offers a yield of 5.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLOT or GSY?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF quarterly revenues of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's net income of --. Notably, iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is -- versus -- for Invesco Ultra Short Duration ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -- GSYInvesco Ultra Short Duration ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLOT or MINT?
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLOT or MINT?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has higher upside potential than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr, analysts believe iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is more attractive than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr0 0 0 -
Is FLOT or MINT More Risky?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 93.019% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr has a beta of 0.103, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.661%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLOT or MINT?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.82%. PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr offers a yield of 5.27% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.42 per share. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLOT or MINT?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr quarterly revenues of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr's net income of --. Notably, iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is -- versus -- for PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -- MINTPIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active Exch Tr-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns FLOT or RAVI?
FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has a net margin of -- compared to iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net margin of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's return on equity of -- beat FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About FLOT or RAVI?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has higher upside potential than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund, analysts believe iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is more attractive than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF0 0 0 RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund0 0 0 -
Is FLOT or RAVI More Risky?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a beta of 0.070, which suggesting that the stock is 93.019% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund has a beta of 0.093, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 90.662%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock FLOT or RAVI?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 5.82%. FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund offers a yield of 5.34% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.32 per share. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios FLOT or RAVI?
iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund quarterly revenues of --. iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's net income of -- is lower than FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's net income of --. Notably, iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for iShares Floating Rate Bond ETF is -- versus -- for FlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income FLOTiShares Floating Rate Bond ETF-- -- -- -- RAVIFlexShares Ultra-Short Income Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is AMD Stock an All-Time Buy?
Advanced Micro Devices (NASDAQ:AMD) is a high-growth AI stock that…
How High Will Airbnb Stock Go?
Airbnb, Inc. (NASDAQ:ABNB) share price has seen substantial turbulence over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Buy
54
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Sell
50
LMND alert for Dec 28
Lemonade [LMND] is down 10.69% over the past day.
Sell
50
TSLL alert for Dec 28
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is down 9.92% over the past day.
Buy
63
SMLR alert for Dec 28
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is down 9.65% over the past day.
