ACMR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of 13.91% compared to ACM Research's net margin of 36.89%. ACM Research's return on equity of 10.25% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 14.67%.

ACM Research has a consensus price target of $35.66, signalling upside risk potential of 32.72%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $250.42 which suggests that it could grow by 30.66%. Given that ACM Research has higher upside potential than Broadcom, analysts believe ACM Research is more attractive than Broadcom.

ACM Research has a beta of 1.610, which suggesting that the stock is 61.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.69399999999999%.

ACM Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 1.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. ACM Research pays 6.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend. ACM Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Broadcom's is not.

ACM Research quarterly revenues are $223.5M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.9B. ACM Research's net income of $31.1M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $5.5B. Notably, ACM Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.68x while Broadcom's PE ratio is 92.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACM Research is 2.28x versus 16.81x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intel has a net margin of 13.91% compared to ACM Research's net margin of -0.88%. ACM Research's return on equity of 10.25% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

ACM Research has a consensus price target of $35.66, signalling upside risk potential of 32.72%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could fall by -5.61%. Given that ACM Research has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe ACM Research is more attractive than Intel.

ACM Research has a beta of 1.610, which suggesting that the stock is 61.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.678%.

ACM Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. ACM Research pays 6.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend. ACM Research's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACM Research quarterly revenues are $223.5M, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. ACM Research's net income of $31.1M is higher than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, ACM Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.68x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACM Research is 2.28x versus 1.96x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

KLA has a net margin of 13.91% compared to ACM Research's net margin of 26.8%. ACM Research's return on equity of 10.25% beat KLA's return on equity of 96.34%.

ACM Research has a consensus price target of $35.66, signalling upside risk potential of 32.72%. On the other hand KLA has an analysts' consensus of $819.68 which suggests that it could grow by 16.02%. Given that ACM Research has higher upside potential than KLA, analysts believe ACM Research is more attractive than KLA.

ACM Research has a beta of 1.610, which suggesting that the stock is 61.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison KLA has a beta of 1.298, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.786%.

ACM Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. KLA offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.70 per share. ACM Research pays 6.66% of its earnings as a dividend. KLA pays out 27.99% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACM Research quarterly revenues are $223.5M, which are smaller than KLA quarterly revenues of $3.1B. ACM Research's net income of $31.1M is lower than KLA's net income of $824.5M. Notably, ACM Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.68x while KLA's PE ratio is 29.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACM Research is 2.28x versus 8.79x for KLA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 13.91% compared to ACM Research's net margin of 56.17%. ACM Research's return on equity of 10.25% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

ACM Research has a consensus price target of $35.66, signalling upside risk potential of 32.72%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.10 which suggests that it could grow by 45.37%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than ACM Research, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than ACM Research.

ACM Research has a beta of 1.610, which suggesting that the stock is 61.047% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

ACM Research has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. ACM Research pays 6.66% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

ACM Research quarterly revenues are $223.5M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. ACM Research's net income of $31.1M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, ACM Research's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.68x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 40.06x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for ACM Research is 2.28x versus 22.37x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.