ACT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Fundamental Global has a net margin of 53.41% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of -65.47%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.21% beat Fundamental Global's return on equity of 40.42%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.60, signalling upside risk potential of 13.73%. On the other hand Fundamental Global has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Fundamental Global, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Fundamental Global.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fundamental Global has a beta of 0.788, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.169%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Fundamental Global offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 16.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Fundamental Global pays out 46.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $304.7M, which are larger than Fundamental Global quarterly revenues of $17.5M. Enact Holdings's net income of $162.7M is higher than Fundamental Global's net income of $17.7M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.77x while Fundamental Global's PE ratio is 0.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.44x versus 0.31x for Fundamental Global. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Root has a net margin of 53.41% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of 6.77%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.21% beat Root's return on equity of 17.79%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.60, signalling upside risk potential of 13.73%. On the other hand Root has an analysts' consensus of $96.60 which suggests that it could fall by -37.37%. Given that Enact Holdings has higher upside potential than Root, analysts believe Enact Holdings is more attractive than Root.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Root has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Root offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 16.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Root pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $304.7M, which are smaller than Root quarterly revenues of $326.7M. Enact Holdings's net income of $162.7M is higher than Root's net income of $22.1M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.77x while Root's PE ratio is 90.20x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.44x versus 2.08x for Root. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a net margin of 53.41% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of 4.73%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.21% beat Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 16.2%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.60, signalling upside risk potential of 13.73%. On the other hand Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has an analysts' consensus of $57.38 which suggests that it could grow by 16.07%. Given that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, analysts believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more attractive than Enact Holdings.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 16.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $304.7M, which are larger than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group quarterly revenues of $304.5M. Enact Holdings's net income of $162.7M is higher than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net income of $14.4M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.77x while Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's PE ratio is 17.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.44x versus 1.78x for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trupanion has a net margin of 53.41% compared to Enact Holdings's net margin of 0.49%. Enact Holdings's return on equity of 14.21% beat Trupanion's return on equity of -3.1%.

Enact Holdings has a consensus price target of $38.60, signalling upside risk potential of 13.73%. On the other hand Trupanion has an analysts' consensus of $52.60 which suggests that it could grow by 39.63%. Given that Trupanion has higher upside potential than Enact Holdings, analysts believe Trupanion is more attractive than Enact Holdings.

Enact Holdings has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trupanion has a beta of 1.697, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.691%.

Enact Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.18%. Trupanion offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Enact Holdings pays 16.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Trupanion pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Enact Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Enact Holdings quarterly revenues are $304.7M, which are smaller than Trupanion quarterly revenues of $337.3M. Enact Holdings's net income of $162.7M is higher than Trupanion's net income of $1.7M. Notably, Enact Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 7.77x while Trupanion's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Enact Holdings is 4.44x versus 1.24x for Trupanion. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.