AFCG Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Gladstone Land has a net margin of -13.25% compared to Advanced Flower Capital's net margin of 2.56%. Advanced Flower Capital's return on equity of 6.21% beat Gladstone Land's return on equity of 1.88%.

Advanced Flower Capital has a consensus price target of $9.70, signalling upside risk potential of 94.39%. On the other hand Gladstone Land has an analysts' consensus of $12.90 which suggests that it could grow by 36.94%. Given that Advanced Flower Capital has higher upside potential than Gladstone Land, analysts believe Advanced Flower Capital is more attractive than Gladstone Land.

Advanced Flower Capital has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Land has a beta of 1.146, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.641%.

Advanced Flower Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 27.46%. Gladstone Land offers a yield of 5.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Advanced Flower Capital pays 238.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Land pays out 333.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Advanced Flower Capital quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Gladstone Land quarterly revenues of $21.1M. Advanced Flower Capital's net income of -$991.5K is lower than Gladstone Land's net income of $540K. Notably, Advanced Flower Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Gladstone Land's PE ratio is 212.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advanced Flower Capital is 2.62x versus 3.97x for Gladstone Land. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a net margin of -13.25% compared to Advanced Flower Capital's net margin of 56.96%. Advanced Flower Capital's return on equity of 6.21% beat Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's return on equity of 12.73%.

Advanced Flower Capital has a consensus price target of $9.70, signalling upside risk potential of 94.39%. On the other hand Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has an analysts' consensus of $18.00 which suggests that it could grow by 31.87%. Given that Advanced Flower Capital has higher upside potential than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance, analysts believe Advanced Flower Capital is more attractive than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance.

Advanced Flower Capital has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Advanced Flower Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 27.46%. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance offers a yield of 13.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.47 per share. Advanced Flower Capital pays 238.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance pays out 112.38% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Advanced Flower Capital quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance quarterly revenues of $13.9M. Advanced Flower Capital's net income of -$991.5K is lower than Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's net income of $7.9M. Notably, Advanced Flower Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance's PE ratio is 7.26x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advanced Flower Capital is 2.62x versus 4.91x for Chicago Atlantic Real Estate Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Seven Hills Realty Trust has a net margin of -13.25% compared to Advanced Flower Capital's net margin of 71.98%. Advanced Flower Capital's return on equity of 6.21% beat Seven Hills Realty Trust's return on equity of 6.52%.

Advanced Flower Capital has a consensus price target of $9.70, signalling upside risk potential of 94.39%. On the other hand Seven Hills Realty Trust has an analysts' consensus of $14.83 which suggests that it could grow by 29.44%. Given that Advanced Flower Capital has higher upside potential than Seven Hills Realty Trust, analysts believe Advanced Flower Capital is more attractive than Seven Hills Realty Trust.

Advanced Flower Capital has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Seven Hills Realty Trust has a beta of 0.695, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 30.514%.

Advanced Flower Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 27.46%. Seven Hills Realty Trust offers a yield of 12.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Advanced Flower Capital pays 238.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Seven Hills Realty Trust pays out 117.78% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Advanced Flower Capital quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are larger than Seven Hills Realty Trust quarterly revenues of $6.5M. Advanced Flower Capital's net income of -$991.5K is lower than Seven Hills Realty Trust's net income of $4.7M. Notably, Advanced Flower Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Seven Hills Realty Trust's PE ratio is 9.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advanced Flower Capital is 2.62x versus 5.63x for Seven Hills Realty Trust. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Strawberry Fields REIT has a net margin of -13.25% compared to Advanced Flower Capital's net margin of 4.81%. Advanced Flower Capital's return on equity of 6.21% beat Strawberry Fields REIT's return on equity of 7.19%.

Advanced Flower Capital has a consensus price target of $9.70, signalling upside risk potential of 94.39%. On the other hand Strawberry Fields REIT has an analysts' consensus of $13.86 which suggests that it could grow by 26.09%. Given that Advanced Flower Capital has higher upside potential than Strawberry Fields REIT, analysts believe Advanced Flower Capital is more attractive than Strawberry Fields REIT.

Advanced Flower Capital has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Strawberry Fields REIT has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Advanced Flower Capital has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 27.46%. Strawberry Fields REIT offers a yield of 4.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.14 per share. Advanced Flower Capital pays 238.25% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT pays out 98.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Strawberry Fields REIT's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Advanced Flower Capital's is not.

Advanced Flower Capital quarterly revenues are $7.5M, which are smaller than Strawberry Fields REIT quarterly revenues of $30.5M. Advanced Flower Capital's net income of -$991.5K is lower than Strawberry Fields REIT's net income of $1.5M. Notably, Advanced Flower Capital's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.24x while Strawberry Fields REIT's PE ratio is 19.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Advanced Flower Capital is 2.62x versus 0.67x for Strawberry Fields REIT. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.