AWH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Azenta has a net margin of -157.16% compared to Aspira Womens Health's net margin of -2.93%. Aspira Womens Health's return on equity of -- beat Azenta's return on equity of -7.49%.

Aspira Womens Health has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 596.2%. On the other hand Azenta has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 12.24%. Given that Aspira Womens Health has higher upside potential than Azenta, analysts believe Aspira Womens Health is more attractive than Azenta.

Aspira Womens Health has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Azenta has a beta of 1.493, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.318%.

Aspira Womens Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Azenta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspira Womens Health pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Azenta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspira Womens Health quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Azenta quarterly revenues of $170.1M. Aspira Womens Health's net income of -$3.5M is higher than Azenta's net income of -$5M. Notably, Aspira Womens Health's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Azenta's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspira Womens Health is 1.11x versus 4.09x for Azenta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bionano Genomics has a net margin of -157.16% compared to Aspira Womens Health's net margin of -728.57%. Aspira Womens Health's return on equity of -- beat Bionano Genomics's return on equity of -158.95%.

Aspira Womens Health has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 596.2%. On the other hand Bionano Genomics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 396.77%. Given that Aspira Womens Health has higher upside potential than Bionano Genomics, analysts believe Aspira Womens Health is more attractive than Bionano Genomics.

Aspira Womens Health has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bionano Genomics has a beta of 2.279, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 127.944%.

Aspira Womens Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bionano Genomics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspira Womens Health pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bionano Genomics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspira Womens Health quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Bionano Genomics quarterly revenues of $6.1M. Aspira Womens Health's net income of -$3.5M is higher than Bionano Genomics's net income of -$44.2M. Notably, Aspira Womens Health's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bionano Genomics's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspira Womens Health is 1.11x versus 0.28x for Bionano Genomics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Bruker has a net margin of -157.16% compared to Aspira Womens Health's net margin of 4.73%. Aspira Womens Health's return on equity of -- beat Bruker's return on equity of 19.61%.

Aspira Womens Health has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 596.2%. On the other hand Bruker has an analysts' consensus of $74.01 which suggests that it could grow by 29.77%. Given that Aspira Womens Health has higher upside potential than Bruker, analysts believe Aspira Womens Health is more attractive than Bruker.

Aspira Womens Health has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bruker has a beta of 1.177, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.733%.

Aspira Womens Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bruker offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Aspira Womens Health pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker pays out 6.88% of its earnings as a dividend. Bruker's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Aspira Womens Health quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Bruker quarterly revenues of $864.4M. Aspira Womens Health's net income of -$3.5M is lower than Bruker's net income of $40.9M. Notably, Aspira Womens Health's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bruker's PE ratio is 27.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspira Womens Health is 1.11x versus 2.60x for Bruker. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Harvard Bioscience has a net margin of -157.16% compared to Aspira Womens Health's net margin of -21.86%. Aspira Womens Health's return on equity of -- beat Harvard Bioscience's return on equity of -20.42%.

Aspira Womens Health has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 596.2%. On the other hand Harvard Bioscience has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 196.91%. Given that Aspira Womens Health has higher upside potential than Harvard Bioscience, analysts believe Aspira Womens Health is more attractive than Harvard Bioscience.

Aspira Womens Health has a beta of 1.389, which suggesting that the stock is 38.903% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Harvard Bioscience has a beta of 1.272, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.217%.

Aspira Womens Health has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Harvard Bioscience offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Aspira Womens Health pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Harvard Bioscience pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Aspira Womens Health quarterly revenues are $2.3M, which are smaller than Harvard Bioscience quarterly revenues of $22M. Aspira Womens Health's net income of -$3.5M is higher than Harvard Bioscience's net income of -$4.8M. Notably, Aspira Womens Health's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Harvard Bioscience's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Aspira Womens Health is 1.11x versus 0.93x for Harvard Bioscience. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.