BETR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Onity Group has a net margin of -202.68% compared to Better Home & Finance Holding's net margin of 7.37%. Better Home & Finance Holding's return on equity of -246.58% beat Onity Group's return on equity of 3.31%.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Onity Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 42.88%. Given that Onity Group has higher upside potential than Better Home & Finance Holding, analysts believe Onity Group is more attractive than Better Home & Finance Holding.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Onity Group has a beta of 1.854, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 85.431%.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Onity Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Better Home & Finance Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Onity Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Better Home & Finance Holding quarterly revenues are $26.7M, which are smaller than Onity Group quarterly revenues of $290.2M. Better Home & Finance Holding's net income of -$54.2M is lower than Onity Group's net income of $21.4M. Notably, Better Home & Finance Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Onity Group's PE ratio is 20.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Better Home & Finance Holding is 1.64x versus 0.22x for Onity Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Rocket Companies has a net margin of -202.68% compared to Better Home & Finance Holding's net margin of -3.62%. Better Home & Finance Holding's return on equity of -246.58% beat Rocket Companies's return on equity of -0.18%.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Rocket Companies has an analysts' consensus of $14.57 which suggests that it could grow by 30.1%. Given that Rocket Companies has higher upside potential than Better Home & Finance Holding, analysts believe Rocket Companies is more attractive than Better Home & Finance Holding.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rocket Companies has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Rocket Companies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Better Home & Finance Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rocket Companies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Better Home & Finance Holding quarterly revenues are $26.7M, which are smaller than Rocket Companies quarterly revenues of $608.3M. Better Home & Finance Holding's net income of -$54.2M is lower than Rocket Companies's net income of -$22M. Notably, Better Home & Finance Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Rocket Companies's PE ratio is 275.71x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Better Home & Finance Holding is 1.64x versus 4.43x for Rocket Companies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Velocity Financial has a net margin of -202.68% compared to Better Home & Finance Holding's net margin of 32.08%. Better Home & Finance Holding's return on equity of -246.58% beat Velocity Financial's return on equity of 14.32%.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Velocity Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.77%. Given that Velocity Financial has higher upside potential than Better Home & Finance Holding, analysts believe Velocity Financial is more attractive than Better Home & Finance Holding.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Velocity Financial has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Velocity Financial offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Better Home & Finance Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Velocity Financial pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Better Home & Finance Holding quarterly revenues are $26.7M, which are smaller than Velocity Financial quarterly revenues of $49.3M. Better Home & Finance Holding's net income of -$54.2M is lower than Velocity Financial's net income of $15.8M. Notably, Better Home & Finance Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Velocity Financial's PE ratio is 10.52x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Better Home & Finance Holding is 1.64x versus 3.53x for Velocity Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Walker & Dunlop has a net margin of -202.68% compared to Better Home & Finance Holding's net margin of 9.85%. Better Home & Finance Holding's return on equity of -246.58% beat Walker & Dunlop's return on equity of 5.46%.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Walker & Dunlop has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 25.01%. Given that Walker & Dunlop has higher upside potential than Better Home & Finance Holding, analysts believe Walker & Dunlop is more attractive than Better Home & Finance Holding.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Walker & Dunlop has a beta of 1.529, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.891%.

Better Home & Finance Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Walker & Dunlop offers a yield of 2.64% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. Better Home & Finance Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop pays out 79.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Walker & Dunlop's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Better Home & Finance Holding quarterly revenues are $26.7M, which are smaller than Walker & Dunlop quarterly revenues of $292.3M. Better Home & Finance Holding's net income of -$54.2M is lower than Walker & Dunlop's net income of $28.8M. Notably, Better Home & Finance Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Walker & Dunlop's PE ratio is 35.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Better Home & Finance Holding is 1.64x versus 3.06x for Walker & Dunlop. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.