BLNK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

APi Group has a net margin of -244.28% compared to Blink Charging's net margin of 3.6%. Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43% beat APi Group's return on equity of 9.52%.

Blink Charging has a consensus price target of $2.79, signalling upside risk potential of 197.65%. On the other hand APi Group has an analysts' consensus of $45.60 which suggests that it could grow by 26.74%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than APi Group, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than APi Group.

Blink Charging has a beta of 2.862, which suggesting that the stock is 186.224% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison APi Group has a beta of 1.877, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 87.73%.

Blink Charging has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. APi Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blink Charging pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. APi Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blink Charging quarterly revenues are $30.1M, which are smaller than APi Group quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Blink Charging's net income of -$73.5M is lower than APi Group's net income of $67M. Notably, Blink Charging's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while APi Group's PE ratio is 96.11x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blink Charging is 0.76x versus 1.38x for APi Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forrester Research has a net margin of -244.28% compared to Blink Charging's net margin of 0.4%. Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43% beat Forrester Research's return on equity of -2.45%.

Blink Charging has a consensus price target of $2.79, signalling upside risk potential of 197.65%. On the other hand Forrester Research has an analysts' consensus of $15.00 which suggests that it could grow by 53.85%. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than Forrester Research, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than Forrester Research.

Blink Charging has a beta of 2.862, which suggesting that the stock is 186.224% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forrester Research has a beta of 0.934, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.613%.

Blink Charging has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forrester Research offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blink Charging pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forrester Research pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blink Charging quarterly revenues are $30.1M, which are smaller than Forrester Research quarterly revenues of $108M. Blink Charging's net income of -$73.5M is lower than Forrester Research's net income of $432K. Notably, Blink Charging's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forrester Research's PE ratio is 239.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blink Charging is 0.76x versus 0.43x for Forrester Research. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Gold Rock Holdings has a net margin of -244.28% compared to Blink Charging's net margin of -3.79%. Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43% beat Gold Rock Holdings's return on equity of --.

Blink Charging has a consensus price target of $2.79, signalling upside risk potential of 197.65%. On the other hand Gold Rock Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than Gold Rock Holdings, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than Gold Rock Holdings.

Blink Charging has a beta of 2.862, which suggesting that the stock is 186.224% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gold Rock Holdings has a beta of 5,716.465, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 571546.478%.

Blink Charging has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Gold Rock Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blink Charging pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Gold Rock Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blink Charging quarterly revenues are $30.1M, which are larger than Gold Rock Holdings quarterly revenues of $66K. Blink Charging's net income of -$73.5M is lower than Gold Rock Holdings's net income of -$2.5K. Notably, Blink Charging's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Gold Rock Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blink Charging is 0.76x versus -- for Gold Rock Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

One World Universe has a net margin of -244.28% compared to Blink Charging's net margin of --. Blink Charging's return on equity of -56.43% beat One World Universe's return on equity of --.

Blink Charging has a consensus price target of $2.79, signalling upside risk potential of 197.65%. On the other hand One World Universe has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Blink Charging has higher upside potential than One World Universe, analysts believe Blink Charging is more attractive than One World Universe.

Blink Charging has a beta of 2.862, which suggesting that the stock is 186.224% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison One World Universe has a beta of 2.281, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.066%.

Blink Charging has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. One World Universe offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Blink Charging pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. One World Universe pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Blink Charging quarterly revenues are $30.1M, which are larger than One World Universe quarterly revenues of --. Blink Charging's net income of -$73.5M is higher than One World Universe's net income of --. Notably, Blink Charging's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while One World Universe's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Blink Charging is 0.76x versus -- for One World Universe. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.