BOKF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bar Harbor Bankshares has a net margin of 24.22% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 27.38%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Bar Harbor Bankshares's return on equity of 9.66%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $109.20, signalling upside risk potential of 22.22%. On the other hand Bar Harbor Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of $32.50 which suggests that it could grow by 11.34%. Given that BOK Financial has higher upside potential than Bar Harbor Bankshares, analysts believe BOK Financial is more attractive than Bar Harbor Bankshares.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bar Harbor Bankshares has a beta of 0.664, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.609%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Bar Harbor Bankshares offers a yield of 4.11% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Bar Harbor Bankshares pays out 40.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $494.6M, which are larger than Bar Harbor Bankshares quarterly revenues of $37.3M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Bar Harbor Bankshares's net income of $10.2M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.27x while Bar Harbor Bankshares's PE ratio is 10.24x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 2.87x versus 2.97x for Bar Harbor Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 24.22% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 20.42%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 6.65%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $109.20, signalling upside risk potential of 22.22%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of $45.50 which suggests that it could grow by 19.17%. Given that BOK Financial has higher upside potential than Evans Bancorp, analysts believe BOK Financial is more attractive than Evans Bancorp.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.745, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.462%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 3.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 60.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $494.6M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18.3M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $3.7M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.27x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 17.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 2.87x versus 3.06x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 24.22% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 28.72%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Park National's return on equity of 12.67%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $109.20, signalling upside risk potential of 22.22%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of $170.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.94%. Given that BOK Financial has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe BOK Financial is more attractive than Park National.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.722, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.76%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Park National offers a yield of 2.87% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.07 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 51.18% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $494.6M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $134.5M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.6M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.27x while Park National's PE ratio is 15.89x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 2.87x versus 4.62x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Synovus Financial has a net margin of 24.22% compared to BOK Financial's net margin of 34.16%. BOK Financial's return on equity of 10.25% beat Synovus Financial's return on equity of 10.56%.

BOK Financial has a consensus price target of $109.20, signalling upside risk potential of 22.22%. On the other hand Synovus Financial has an analysts' consensus of $54.56 which suggests that it could grow by 28.47%. Given that Synovus Financial has higher upside potential than BOK Financial, analysts believe Synovus Financial is more attractive than BOK Financial.

BOK Financial has a beta of 0.932, which suggesting that the stock is 6.778% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Synovus Financial has a beta of 1.159, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.882%.

BOK Financial has a quarterly dividend of $0.57 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.51%. Synovus Financial offers a yield of 3.6% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. BOK Financial pays 27.31% of its earnings as a dividend. Synovus Financial pays out 54.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BOK Financial quarterly revenues are $494.6M, which are smaller than Synovus Financial quarterly revenues of $570.9M. BOK Financial's net income of $119.8M is lower than Synovus Financial's net income of $195M. Notably, BOK Financial's price-to-earnings ratio is 10.27x while Synovus Financial's PE ratio is 11.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BOK Financial is 2.87x versus 3.03x for Synovus Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.