BTBD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jack In The Box has a net margin of -5.05% compared to BT Brands's net margin of 6.28%. BT Brands's return on equity of -13.87% beat Jack In The Box's return on equity of --.

BT Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Jack In The Box has an analysts' consensus of $63.25 which suggests that it could grow by 33.19%. Given that Jack In The Box has higher upside potential than BT Brands, analysts believe Jack In The Box is more attractive than BT Brands.

BT Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jack In The Box has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.305%.

BT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jack In The Box offers a yield of 4.39% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.44 per share. BT Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jack In The Box pays out -92.58% of its earnings as a dividend.

BT Brands quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Jack In The Box quarterly revenues of $349.3M. BT Brands's net income of -$219.5K is lower than Jack In The Box's net income of $21.9M. Notably, BT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Jack In The Box's PE ratio is 11.88x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BT Brands is 0.59x versus 0.54x for Jack In The Box. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Nathan's Famous has a net margin of -5.05% compared to BT Brands's net margin of 14.67%. BT Brands's return on equity of -13.87% beat Nathan's Famous's return on equity of --.

BT Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Nathan's Famous has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that BT Brands has higher upside potential than Nathan's Famous, analysts believe BT Brands is more attractive than Nathan's Famous.

BT Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Nathan's Famous has a beta of 0.223, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.711%.

BT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Nathan's Famous offers a yield of 2.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. BT Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Nathan's Famous pays out 41.6% of its earnings as a dividend. Nathan's Famous's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BT Brands quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Nathan's Famous quarterly revenues of $41.1M. BT Brands's net income of -$219.5K is lower than Nathan's Famous's net income of $6M. Notably, BT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Nathan's Famous's PE ratio is 14.94x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BT Brands is 0.59x versus 2.27x for Nathan's Famous. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Noodles & has a net margin of -5.05% compared to BT Brands's net margin of -5.5%. BT Brands's return on equity of -13.87% beat Noodles &'s return on equity of -171.96%.

BT Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Noodles & has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 347.16%. Given that Noodles & has higher upside potential than BT Brands, analysts believe Noodles & is more attractive than BT Brands.

BT Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Noodles & has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.318%.

BT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Noodles & offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. BT Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Noodles & pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

BT Brands quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Noodles & quarterly revenues of $122.8M. BT Brands's net income of -$219.5K is higher than Noodles &'s net income of -$6.8M. Notably, BT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Noodles &'s PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BT Brands is 0.59x versus 0.06x for Noodles &. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Papa John's International has a net margin of -5.05% compared to BT Brands's net margin of 8.25%. BT Brands's return on equity of -13.87% beat Papa John's International's return on equity of --.

BT Brands has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Papa John's International has an analysts' consensus of $60.73 which suggests that it could grow by 55.36%. Given that Papa John's International has higher upside potential than BT Brands, analysts believe Papa John's International is more attractive than BT Brands.

BT Brands has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Papa John's International has a beta of 1.158, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.803%.

BT Brands has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Papa John's International offers a yield of 4.71% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. BT Brands pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Papa John's International pays out 71.2% of its earnings as a dividend. Papa John's International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

BT Brands quarterly revenues are $4.3M, which are smaller than Papa John's International quarterly revenues of $506.8M. BT Brands's net income of -$219.5K is lower than Papa John's International's net income of $41.8M. Notably, BT Brands's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Papa John's International's PE ratio is 13.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for BT Brands is 0.59x versus 0.61x for Papa John's International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.