BWEN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CVD Equipment has a net margin of 0.21% compared to Broadwind's net margin of 2.48%. Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46% beat CVD Equipment's return on equity of -16.7%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 154.76%. On the other hand CVD Equipment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 323.28%. Given that CVD Equipment has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe CVD Equipment is more attractive than Broadwind.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.420, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.025%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CVD Equipment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CVD Equipment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $35.5M, which are larger than CVD Equipment quarterly revenues of $8.2M. Broadwind's net income of $74K is lower than CVD Equipment's net income of $203K. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while CVD Equipment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.26x versus 1.09x for CVD Equipment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Intevac has a net margin of 0.21% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -7.62%. Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46% beat Intevac's return on equity of -7.77%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 154.76%. On the other hand Intevac has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 116.05%. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Intevac, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Intevac.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intevac has a beta of 0.738, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.202%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intevac offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intevac pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $35.5M, which are larger than Intevac quarterly revenues of $28.5M. Broadwind's net income of $74K is higher than Intevac's net income of -$2.2M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while Intevac's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.26x versus 1.32x for Intevac. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Ocean Power Technologies has a net margin of 0.21% compared to Broadwind's net margin of -161.83%. Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46% beat Ocean Power Technologies's return on equity of -89.48%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 154.76%. On the other hand Ocean Power Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Broadwind has higher upside potential than Ocean Power Technologies, analysts believe Broadwind is more attractive than Ocean Power Technologies.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ocean Power Technologies has a beta of 2.853, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 185.315%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ocean Power Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ocean Power Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $35.5M, which are larger than Ocean Power Technologies quarterly revenues of $2.4M. Broadwind's net income of $74K is higher than Ocean Power Technologies's net income of -$3.9M. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while Ocean Power Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.26x versus 3.66x for Ocean Power Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SIFCO Industries has a net margin of 0.21% compared to Broadwind's net margin of 0.25%. Broadwind's return on equity of 5.46% beat SIFCO Industries's return on equity of -15.8%.

Broadwind has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 154.76%. On the other hand SIFCO Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 208.88%. Given that SIFCO Industries has higher upside potential than Broadwind, analysts believe SIFCO Industries is more attractive than Broadwind.

Broadwind has a beta of 1.447, which suggesting that the stock is 44.678% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SIFCO Industries has a beta of 1.225, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.519%.

Broadwind has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SIFCO Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Broadwind pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SIFCO Industries pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Broadwind quarterly revenues are $35.5M, which are larger than SIFCO Industries quarterly revenues of $29.3M. Broadwind's net income of $74K is higher than SIFCO Industries's net income of $72K. Notably, Broadwind's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.84x while SIFCO Industries's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Broadwind is 0.26x versus 0.23x for SIFCO Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.