BZUN Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cango has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Baozun's net margin of --. Baozun's return on equity of -4% beat Cango's return on equity of 3.59%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of $3.51, signalling upside risk potential of 19.19%. On the other hand Cango has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -36.42%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than Cango, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than Cango.

Baozun has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.929% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cango has a beta of 0.606, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.354%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cango offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -0.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Cango pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $287.3M, which are larger than Cango quarterly revenues of $3.8M. Baozun's net income of -$12.3M is lower than Cango's net income of $9.5M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cango's PE ratio is 17.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.14x versus 12.58x for Cango. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MOGU has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Baozun's net margin of --. Baozun's return on equity of -4% beat MOGU's return on equity of -7.88%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of $3.51, signalling upside risk potential of 19.19%. On the other hand MOGU has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1156.05%. Given that MOGU has higher upside potential than Baozun, analysts believe MOGU is more attractive than Baozun.

Baozun has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.929% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MOGU has a beta of 0.610, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.989%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MOGU offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -0.4% of its earnings as a dividend. MOGU pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $287.3M, which are larger than MOGU quarterly revenues of --. Baozun's net income of -$12.3M is higher than MOGU's net income of --. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MOGU's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.14x versus 1.04x for MOGU. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Trip.com Group has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Baozun's net margin of 42.62%. Baozun's return on equity of -4% beat Trip.com Group's return on equity of 12.5%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of $3.51, signalling upside risk potential of 19.19%. On the other hand Trip.com Group has an analysts' consensus of $76.76 which suggests that it could grow by 18.31%. Given that Baozun has higher upside potential than Trip.com Group, analysts believe Baozun is more attractive than Trip.com Group.

Baozun has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.929% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Trip.com Group has a beta of 0.373, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.678%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Trip.com Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -0.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Trip.com Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $287.3M, which are smaller than Trip.com Group quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Baozun's net income of -$12.3M is lower than Trip.com Group's net income of $944.8M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Trip.com Group's PE ratio is 19.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.14x versus 6.21x for Trip.com Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tuniu has a net margin of -4.28% compared to Baozun's net margin of 23.9%. Baozun's return on equity of -4% beat Tuniu's return on equity of -2.93%.

Baozun has a consensus price target of $3.51, signalling upside risk potential of 19.19%. On the other hand Tuniu has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 139.96%. Given that Tuniu has higher upside potential than Baozun, analysts believe Tuniu is more attractive than Baozun.

Baozun has a beta of 0.311, which suggesting that the stock is 68.929% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tuniu has a beta of 1.703, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.277%.

Baozun has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tuniu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Baozun pays -0.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Tuniu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Baozun quarterly revenues are $287.3M, which are larger than Tuniu quarterly revenues of $26M. Baozun's net income of -$12.3M is lower than Tuniu's net income of $6.2M. Notably, Baozun's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Tuniu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Baozun is 0.14x versus 1.72x for Tuniu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.