CATY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blue Ridge Bankshares has a net margin of 35.62% compared to Cathay General Bancorp's net margin of 4.33%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 10.46% beat Blue Ridge Bankshares's return on equity of -7.9%.

Cathay General Bancorp has a consensus price target of $53.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Blue Ridge Bankshares has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Cathay General Bancorp has higher upside potential than Blue Ridge Bankshares, analysts believe Cathay General Bancorp is more attractive than Blue Ridge Bankshares.

Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blue Ridge Bankshares has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.548%.

Cathay General Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Blue Ridge Bankshares offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Cathay General Bancorp pays 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Blue Ridge Bankshares pays out -8.96% of its earnings as a dividend. Cathay General Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cathay General Bancorp quarterly revenues are $189.5M, which are larger than Blue Ridge Bankshares quarterly revenues of $21.8M. Cathay General Bancorp's net income of $67.5M is higher than Blue Ridge Bankshares's net income of $946K. Notably, Cathay General Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.25x while Blue Ridge Bankshares's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cathay General Bancorp is 4.72x versus 1.24x for Blue Ridge Bankshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Evans Bancorp has a net margin of 35.62% compared to Cathay General Bancorp's net margin of 16.32%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 10.46% beat Evans Bancorp's return on equity of 10.61%.

Cathay General Bancorp has a consensus price target of $53.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Evans Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.21%. Given that Evans Bancorp has higher upside potential than Cathay General Bancorp, analysts believe Evans Bancorp is more attractive than Cathay General Bancorp.

Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Evans Bancorp has a beta of 0.922, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.751%.

Cathay General Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Evans Bancorp offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.66 per share. Cathay General Bancorp pays 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Evans Bancorp pays out 29.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cathay General Bancorp quarterly revenues are $189.5M, which are larger than Evans Bancorp quarterly revenues of $18M. Cathay General Bancorp's net income of $67.5M is higher than Evans Bancorp's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Cathay General Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.25x while Evans Bancorp's PE ratio is 13.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cathay General Bancorp is 4.72x versus 2.92x for Evans Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park National has a net margin of 35.62% compared to Cathay General Bancorp's net margin of 27.77%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 10.46% beat Park National's return on equity of 11.8%.

Cathay General Bancorp has a consensus price target of $53.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Park National has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1.56%. Given that Cathay General Bancorp has higher upside potential than Park National, analysts believe Cathay General Bancorp is more attractive than Park National.

Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park National has a beta of 0.718, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.154%.

Cathay General Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Park National offers a yield of 2.38% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.56 per share. Cathay General Bancorp pays 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Park National pays out 54.41% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Cathay General Bancorp quarterly revenues are $189.5M, which are larger than Park National quarterly revenues of $137.6M. Cathay General Bancorp's net income of $67.5M is higher than Park National's net income of $38.2M. Notably, Cathay General Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.25x while Park National's PE ratio is 21.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cathay General Bancorp is 4.72x versus 5.82x for Park National. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tompkins Financial has a net margin of 35.62% compared to Cathay General Bancorp's net margin of 24.66%. Cathay General Bancorp's return on equity of 10.46% beat Tompkins Financial's return on equity of 9.88%.

Cathay General Bancorp has a consensus price target of $53.60, signalling upside risk potential of 10.2%. On the other hand Tompkins Financial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 19.36%. Given that Tompkins Financial has higher upside potential than Cathay General Bancorp, analysts believe Tompkins Financial is more attractive than Cathay General Bancorp.

Cathay General Bancorp has a beta of 1.118, which suggesting that the stock is 11.793% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tompkins Financial has a beta of 0.720, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 28.046%.

Cathay General Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.8%. Tompkins Financial offers a yield of 3.51% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Cathay General Bancorp pays 27.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Tompkins Financial pays out 363.09% of its earnings as a dividend. Cathay General Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Tompkins Financial's is not.

Cathay General Bancorp quarterly revenues are $189.5M, which are larger than Tompkins Financial quarterly revenues of $75.6M. Cathay General Bancorp's net income of $67.5M is higher than Tompkins Financial's net income of $18.6M. Notably, Cathay General Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 12.25x while Tompkins Financial's PE ratio is 15.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Cathay General Bancorp is 4.72x versus 3.43x for Tompkins Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.