CENX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cleveland-Cliffs has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of -10.34%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Cleveland-Cliffs's return on equity of -10.21%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand Cleveland-Cliffs has an analysts' consensus of $12.00 which suggests that it could grow by 23.33%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Cleveland-Cliffs, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Cleveland-Cliffs.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, which suggesting that the stock is 167.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cleveland-Cliffs has a beta of 1.942, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 94.16%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cleveland-Cliffs offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cleveland-Cliffs pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Cleveland-Cliffs quarterly revenues of $4.3B. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is higher than Cleveland-Cliffs's net income of -$447M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.20x while Cleveland-Cliffs's PE ratio is 175.97x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.85x versus 0.24x for Cleveland-Cliffs. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kaiser Aluminum has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 0.93%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Kaiser Aluminum's return on equity of 7.06%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand Kaiser Aluminum has an analysts' consensus of $79.67 which suggests that it could grow by 15.18%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Kaiser Aluminum, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Kaiser Aluminum.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, which suggesting that the stock is 167.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kaiser Aluminum has a beta of 1.375, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.517%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kaiser Aluminum offers a yield of 4.45% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.77 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kaiser Aluminum pays out 108.33% of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Kaiser Aluminum quarterly revenues of $765.4M. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is higher than Kaiser Aluminum's net income of $7.1M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.20x while Kaiser Aluminum's PE ratio is 24.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.85x versus 0.37x for Kaiser Aluminum. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Steel Dynamics has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of 5.35%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat Steel Dynamics's return on equity of 17.07%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand Steel Dynamics has an analysts' consensus of $145.70 which suggests that it could grow by 18.22%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than Steel Dynamics, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than Steel Dynamics.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, which suggesting that the stock is 167.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steel Dynamics has a beta of 1.336, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 33.606%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steel Dynamics offers a yield of 1.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics pays out 18.39% of its earnings as a dividend. Steel Dynamics's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than Steel Dynamics quarterly revenues of $3.9B. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is lower than Steel Dynamics's net income of $207.3M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.20x while Steel Dynamics's PE ratio is 12.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.85x versus 1.10x for Steel Dynamics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

United States Steel has a net margin of 7.16% compared to Century Aluminum's net margin of -2.54%. Century Aluminum's return on equity of 60.03% beat United States Steel's return on equity of 3.37%.

Century Aluminum has a consensus price target of $25.00, signalling upside risk potential of 28.87%. On the other hand United States Steel has an analysts' consensus of $40.94 which suggests that it could grow by 7.6%. Given that Century Aluminum has higher upside potential than United States Steel, analysts believe Century Aluminum is more attractive than United States Steel.

Century Aluminum has a beta of 2.671, which suggesting that the stock is 167.143% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison United States Steel has a beta of 1.862, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.249%.

Century Aluminum has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. United States Steel offers a yield of 0.53% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. Century Aluminum pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. United States Steel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Century Aluminum quarterly revenues are $630.9M, which are smaller than United States Steel quarterly revenues of $3.5B. Century Aluminum's net income of $45.2M is higher than United States Steel's net income of -$89M. Notably, Century Aluminum's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.20x while United States Steel's PE ratio is 25.54x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Century Aluminum is 0.85x versus 0.62x for United States Steel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.