CROX Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Steven Madden has a net margin of 37.27% compared to Crocs's net margin of 5.98%. Crocs's return on equity of 57.48% beat Steven Madden's return on equity of 19.88%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $129.26, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Steven Madden has an analysts' consensus of $37.44 which suggests that it could grow by 47.94%. Given that Steven Madden has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Steven Madden is more attractive than Crocs.

Crocs has a beta of 1.837, which suggesting that the stock is 83.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Steven Madden has a beta of 1.064, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.406%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Steven Madden offers a yield of 3.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden pays out 36.04% of its earnings as a dividend. Steven Madden's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $989.8M, which are larger than Steven Madden quarterly revenues of $582.3M. Crocs's net income of $368.9M is higher than Steven Madden's net income of $34.8M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.47x while Steven Madden's PE ratio is 10.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.51x versus 0.80x for Steven Madden. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Skechers USA has a net margin of 37.27% compared to Crocs's net margin of 4.49%. Crocs's return on equity of 57.48% beat Skechers USA's return on equity of 13.73%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $129.26, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Skechers USA has an analysts' consensus of $80.25 which suggests that it could grow by 40.57%. Given that Skechers USA has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Skechers USA is more attractive than Crocs.

Crocs has a beta of 1.837, which suggesting that the stock is 83.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Skechers USA has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.154%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Skechers USA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Skechers USA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $989.8M, which are smaller than Skechers USA quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Crocs's net income of $368.9M is higher than Skechers USA's net income of $99.3M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.47x while Skechers USA's PE ratio is 13.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.51x versus 0.98x for Skechers USA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wolverine World Wide has a net margin of 37.27% compared to Crocs's net margin of 4.97%. Crocs's return on equity of 57.48% beat Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of 16.59%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $129.26, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand Wolverine World Wide has an analysts' consensus of $22.89 which suggests that it could grow by 71.32%. Given that Wolverine World Wide has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe Wolverine World Wide is more attractive than Crocs.

Crocs has a beta of 1.837, which suggesting that the stock is 83.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.931, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 93.074%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wolverine World Wide offers a yield of 2.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide pays out 67.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Wolverine World Wide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $989.8M, which are larger than Wolverine World Wide quarterly revenues of $494.7M. Crocs's net income of $368.9M is higher than Wolverine World Wide's net income of $24.6M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.47x while Wolverine World Wide's PE ratio is 24.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.51x versus 0.61x for Wolverine World Wide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

YETI Holdings has a net margin of 37.27% compared to Crocs's net margin of 9.73%. Crocs's return on equity of 57.48% beat YETI Holdings's return on equity of 24.49%.

Crocs has a consensus price target of $129.26, signalling upside risk potential of 24.9%. On the other hand YETI Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $43.94 which suggests that it could grow by 36.58%. Given that YETI Holdings has higher upside potential than Crocs, analysts believe YETI Holdings is more attractive than Crocs.

Crocs has a beta of 1.837, which suggesting that the stock is 83.697% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison YETI Holdings has a beta of 2.150, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 114.984%.

Crocs has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. YETI Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Crocs pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. YETI Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Crocs quarterly revenues are $989.8M, which are larger than YETI Holdings quarterly revenues of $546.5M. Crocs's net income of $368.9M is higher than YETI Holdings's net income of $53.2M. Notably, Crocs's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.47x while YETI Holdings's PE ratio is 15.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Crocs is 1.51x versus 1.51x for YETI Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.