ESLT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Kornit Digital has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Elbit Systems's net margin of -1.79%. Elbit Systems's return on equity of 8.76% beat Kornit Digital's return on equity of -5.27%.

Elbit Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.17%. On the other hand Kornit Digital has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -0.28%. Given that Elbit Systems has higher upside potential than Kornit Digital, analysts believe Elbit Systems is more attractive than Kornit Digital.

Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kornit Digital has a beta of 2.014, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 101.446%.

Elbit Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. Kornit Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elbit Systems pays 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Kornit Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elbit Systems quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than Kornit Digital quarterly revenues of $50.7M. Elbit Systems's net income of $79.1M is higher than Kornit Digital's net income of -$908K. Notably, Elbit Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.18x while Kornit Digital's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elbit Systems is 1.77x versus 7.67x for Kornit Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SuperCom has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Elbit Systems's net margin of --. Elbit Systems's return on equity of 8.76% beat SuperCom's return on equity of --.

Elbit Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.17%. On the other hand SuperCom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 223.45%. Given that SuperCom has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems, analysts believe SuperCom is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SuperCom has a beta of 0.138, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 86.195%.

Elbit Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. SuperCom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elbit Systems pays 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. SuperCom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elbit Systems quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than SuperCom quarterly revenues of --. Elbit Systems's net income of $79.1M is higher than SuperCom's net income of --. Notably, Elbit Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.18x while SuperCom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elbit Systems is 1.77x versus 0.12x for SuperCom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TAT Technologies has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Elbit Systems's net margin of 7.08%. Elbit Systems's return on equity of 8.76% beat TAT Technologies's return on equity of 8.53%.

Elbit Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.17%. On the other hand TAT Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 13.68%. Given that TAT Technologies has higher upside potential than Elbit Systems, analysts believe TAT Technologies is more attractive than Elbit Systems.

Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TAT Technologies has a beta of 0.936, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.403%.

Elbit Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. TAT Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Elbit Systems pays 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. TAT Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elbit Systems quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are larger than TAT Technologies quarterly revenues of $40.5M. Elbit Systems's net income of $79.1M is higher than TAT Technologies's net income of $2.9M. Notably, Elbit Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.18x while TAT Technologies's PE ratio is 35.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elbit Systems is 1.77x versus 1.89x for TAT Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a net margin of 4.61% compared to Elbit Systems's net margin of 40.67%. Elbit Systems's return on equity of 8.76% beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's return on equity of 49.93%.

Elbit Systems has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 2.17%. On the other hand ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has an analysts' consensus of $17.45 which suggests that it could fall by -17.22%. Given that Elbit Systems has higher upside potential than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, analysts believe Elbit Systems is more attractive than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services.

Elbit Systems has a beta of 0.526, which suggesting that the stock is 47.441% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Elbit Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.77%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services offers a yield of 18.28% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $3.65 per share. Elbit Systems pays 41.49% of its earnings as a dividend. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services pays out -28.54% of its earnings as a dividend. Elbit Systems's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Elbit Systems quarterly revenues are $1.7B, which are smaller than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services quarterly revenues of $2.8B. Elbit Systems's net income of $79.1M is lower than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's net income of $1.1B. Notably, Elbit Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is 44.18x while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services's PE ratio is 1.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Elbit Systems is 1.77x versus 0.35x for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.