FEIM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cohu has a net margin of 16.78% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of -18.94%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 21.52% beat Cohu's return on equity of -5.5%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Cohu has an analysts' consensus of $31.17 which suggests that it could grow by 23.14%. Given that Cohu has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Cohu is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.069% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cohu has a beta of 1.508, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 50.827%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cohu offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cohu pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are smaller than Cohu quarterly revenues of $95.3M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $2.7M is higher than Cohu's net income of -$18.1M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.38x while Cohu's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 3.03x versus 2.68x for Cohu. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Electro-Sensors has a net margin of 16.78% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 9.48%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 21.52% beat Electro-Sensors's return on equity of 3.19%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Electro-Sensors has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Frequency Electronics has higher upside potential than Electro-Sensors, analysts believe Frequency Electronics is more attractive than Electro-Sensors.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.069% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Electro-Sensors has a beta of 0.447, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.264%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Electro-Sensors offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Electro-Sensors pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are larger than Electro-Sensors quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $2.7M is higher than Electro-Sensors's net income of $238K. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.38x while Electro-Sensors's PE ratio is 40.14x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 3.03x versus 1.96x for Electro-Sensors. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Itron has a net margin of 16.78% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 12.67%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 21.52% beat Itron's return on equity of 17.07%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Itron has an analysts' consensus of $127.62 which suggests that it could grow by 16.97%. Given that Itron has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe Itron is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.069% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Itron has a beta of 1.457, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 45.663%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Itron offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Itron pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are smaller than Itron quarterly revenues of $615.5M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $2.7M is lower than Itron's net income of $78M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.38x while Itron's PE ratio is 22.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 3.03x versus 2.10x for Itron. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MKS Instruments has a net margin of 16.78% compared to Frequency Electronics's net margin of 6.92%. Frequency Electronics's return on equity of 21.52% beat MKS Instruments's return on equity of 1.29%.

Frequency Electronics has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand MKS Instruments has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 34.56%. Given that MKS Instruments has higher upside potential than Frequency Electronics, analysts believe MKS Instruments is more attractive than Frequency Electronics.

Frequency Electronics has a beta of 0.479, which suggesting that the stock is 52.069% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MKS Instruments has a beta of 1.653, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.318%.

Frequency Electronics has a quarterly dividend of $1.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MKS Instruments offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share. Frequency Electronics pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MKS Instruments pays out -3.21% of its earnings as a dividend.

Frequency Electronics quarterly revenues are $15.8M, which are smaller than MKS Instruments quarterly revenues of $896M. Frequency Electronics's net income of $2.7M is lower than MKS Instruments's net income of $62M. Notably, Frequency Electronics's price-to-earnings ratio is 23.38x while MKS Instruments's PE ratio is 230.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Frequency Electronics is 3.03x versus 1.97x for MKS Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.