FELE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

American Power Group has a net margin of 6.93% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of --. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 14.53% beat American Power Group's return on equity of --.

Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of $109.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.08%. On the other hand American Power Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Electric has higher upside potential than American Power Group, analysts believe Franklin Electric is more attractive than American Power Group.

Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison American Power Group has a beta of -1.033, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 203.251%.

Franklin Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. American Power Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Electric pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. American Power Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric quarterly revenues are $485.7M, which are larger than American Power Group quarterly revenues of --. Franklin Electric's net income of $33.7M is higher than American Power Group's net income of --. Notably, Franklin Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.82x while American Power Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric is 2.19x versus 0.44x for American Power Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Aura Systems has a net margin of 6.93% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of -213000%. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 14.53% beat Aura Systems's return on equity of --.

Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of $109.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.08%. On the other hand Aura Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Franklin Electric has higher upside potential than Aura Systems, analysts believe Franklin Electric is more attractive than Aura Systems.

Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Aura Systems has a beta of 0.688, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.203%.

Franklin Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Aura Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Electric pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Aura Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric quarterly revenues are $485.7M, which are larger than Aura Systems quarterly revenues of $3K. Franklin Electric's net income of $33.7M is higher than Aura Systems's net income of -$540K. Notably, Franklin Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.82x while Aura Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric is 2.19x versus 394.81x for Aura Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Generac Holdings has a net margin of 6.93% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of 10.44%. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 14.53% beat Generac Holdings's return on equity of 13.54%.

Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of $109.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.08%. On the other hand Generac Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 31.39%. Given that Generac Holdings has higher upside potential than Franklin Electric, analysts believe Generac Holdings is more attractive than Franklin Electric.

Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Generac Holdings has a beta of 1.498, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.834%.

Franklin Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Generac Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Franklin Electric pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Generac Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Franklin Electric's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric quarterly revenues are $485.7M, which are smaller than Generac Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Franklin Electric's net income of $33.7M is lower than Generac Holdings's net income of $128.9M. Notably, Franklin Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.82x while Generac Holdings's PE ratio is 24.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric is 2.19x versus 1.85x for Generac Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Regal Rexnord has a net margin of 6.93% compared to Franklin Electric's net margin of 2.82%. Franklin Electric's return on equity of 14.53% beat Regal Rexnord's return on equity of 3.09%.

Franklin Electric has a consensus price target of $109.00, signalling upside risk potential of 14.08%. On the other hand Regal Rexnord has an analysts' consensus of $178.82 which suggests that it could grow by 48.1%. Given that Regal Rexnord has higher upside potential than Franklin Electric, analysts believe Regal Rexnord is more attractive than Franklin Electric.

Franklin Electric has a beta of 0.978, which suggesting that the stock is 2.206% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Regal Rexnord has a beta of 1.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.378%.

Franklin Electric has a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.06%. Regal Rexnord offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.35 per share. Franklin Electric pays 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Regal Rexnord pays out 47.4% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Franklin Electric quarterly revenues are $485.7M, which are smaller than Regal Rexnord quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Franklin Electric's net income of $33.7M is lower than Regal Rexnord's net income of $41.2M. Notably, Franklin Electric's price-to-earnings ratio is 24.82x while Regal Rexnord's PE ratio is 40.93x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Franklin Electric is 2.19x versus 1.33x for Regal Rexnord. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.