FRPH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Avalon Globocare has a net margin of 12.8% compared to FRP Holdings's net margin of -486.5%. FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.68% beat Avalon Globocare's return on equity of -183.88%.

FRP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Avalon Globocare has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FRP Holdings has higher upside potential than Avalon Globocare, analysts believe FRP Holdings is more attractive than Avalon Globocare.

FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 50.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Avalon Globocare has a beta of 0.274, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 72.589%.

FRP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Avalon Globocare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FRP Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Avalon Globocare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FRP Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.6M, which are larger than Avalon Globocare quarterly revenues of $345.2K. FRP Holdings's net income of $1.4M is higher than Avalon Globocare's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, FRP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 75.48x while Avalon Globocare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FRP Holdings is 13.83x versus 2.46x for Avalon Globocare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

eXp World Holdings has a net margin of 12.8% compared to FRP Holdings's net margin of -0.69%. FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.68% beat eXp World Holdings's return on equity of -14.35%.

FRP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand eXp World Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 33.25%. Given that eXp World Holdings has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe eXp World Holdings is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 50.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison eXp World Holdings has a beta of 2.264, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 126.421%.

FRP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. eXp World Holdings offers a yield of 1.69% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share. FRP Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. eXp World Holdings pays out -317.83% of its earnings as a dividend.

FRP Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.6M, which are smaller than eXp World Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.2B. FRP Holdings's net income of $1.4M is higher than eXp World Holdings's net income of -$8.5M. Notably, FRP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 75.48x while eXp World Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FRP Holdings is 13.83x versus 0.41x for eXp World Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The RMR Group has a net margin of 12.8% compared to FRP Holdings's net margin of 2.51%. FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.68% beat The RMR Group's return on equity of 5.47%.

FRP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand The RMR Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 32.34%. Given that The RMR Group has higher upside potential than FRP Holdings, analysts believe The RMR Group is more attractive than FRP Holdings.

FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 50.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The RMR Group has a beta of 1.239, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.859%.

FRP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The RMR Group offers a yield of 8.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.45 per share. FRP Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The RMR Group pays out 122.88% of its earnings as a dividend.

FRP Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.6M, which are smaller than The RMR Group quarterly revenues of $212.7M. FRP Holdings's net income of $1.4M is lower than The RMR Group's net income of $5.3M. Notably, FRP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 75.48x while The RMR Group's PE ratio is 15.28x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FRP Holdings is 13.83x versus 0.56x for The RMR Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Safe & Green Development has a net margin of 12.8% compared to FRP Holdings's net margin of -2883.88%. FRP Holdings's return on equity of 1.68% beat Safe & Green Development's return on equity of --.

FRP Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Safe & Green Development has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that FRP Holdings has higher upside potential than Safe & Green Development, analysts believe FRP Holdings is more attractive than Safe & Green Development.

FRP Holdings has a beta of 0.496, which suggesting that the stock is 50.4% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Safe & Green Development has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

FRP Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Safe & Green Development offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. FRP Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Safe & Green Development pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

FRP Holdings quarterly revenues are $10.6M, which are larger than Safe & Green Development quarterly revenues of $81.2K. FRP Holdings's net income of $1.4M is higher than Safe & Green Development's net income of -$2.3M. Notably, FRP Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 75.48x while Safe & Green Development's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for FRP Holdings is 13.83x versus -- for Safe & Green Development. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.