Financhill
Buy
59

FSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$26.48
Seasonality move :
7.76%
Day range:
$26.35 - $27.08
52-week range:
$14.23 - $30.77
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
6.78x
P/S ratio:
0.54x
P/B ratio:
1.57x
Volume:
69.1K
Avg. volume:
46.5K
1-year change:
30.9%
Market cap:
$285.8M
Revenue:
$543.7M
EPS (TTM):
$3.89

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
FSTR
L.B. Foster
$142.3M -- -2.52% -- --
BECN
Beacon Roofing Supply
$2.8B $2.83 5.67% 12.36% $116.09
EVI
EVI Industries
-- -- -- -- --
GIC
Global Industrial
$353.4M $0.58 -3.3% -23.75% --
RYI
Ryerson Holding
$1.1B $0.04 -7.97% -96% --
TRNS
Transcat
$70.3M $0.65 7.53% 38.16% $123.20
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
FSTR
L.B. Foster
$26.39 -- $285.8M 6.78x $0.00 0% 0.54x
BECN
Beacon Roofing Supply
$101.59 $116.09 $6.3B 17.37x $0.00 0% 0.67x
EVI
EVI Industries
$17.42 -- $247.9M 35.55x $0.31 0% 0.64x
GIC
Global Industrial
$25.20 -- $963.4M 14.82x $0.25 3.97% 0.72x
RYI
Ryerson Holding
$19.54 -- $622.3M 31.02x $0.19 3.84% 0.14x
TRNS
Transcat
$105.80 $123.20 $973.3M 52.64x $0.00 0% 3.53x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
FSTR
L.B. Foster
27.37% 3.881 31.4% 1.18x
BECN
Beacon Roofing Supply
60.73% 0.748 54.87% 0.86x
EVI
EVI Industries
12.77% 0.655 8.11% 0.64x
GIC
Global Industrial
-- 1.860 -- 1.01x
RYI
Ryerson Holding
38.53% 0.516 81.18% 0.91x
TRNS
Transcat
1.1% 2.108 0.27% 2.77x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
FSTR
L.B. Foster
$32.8M $7.3M 19.07% 28.12% 5.46% $21.7M
BECN
Beacon Roofing Supply
$730.4M $246.7M 8.38% 20.59% 8.9% $222.7M
EVI
EVI Industries
$28.9M $5M 4.8% 5.65% 5.33% -$1M
GIC
Global Industrial
$116.3M $22.2M 25.02% 25.02% 6.48% $8.7M
RYI
Ryerson Holding
$202M $5.1M 1.59% 2.43% 0.45% $103M
TRNS
Transcat
$21.2M $3.7M 7.59% 8.06% 5.59% $2.9M

L.B. Foster vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns FSTR or BECN?

    Beacon Roofing Supply has a net margin of 26.12% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 5.24%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 28.12% beat Beacon Roofing Supply's return on equity of 20.59%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    23.83% $3.27 $251M
    BECN
    Beacon Roofing Supply
    26.34% $2.30 $4.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About FSTR or BECN?

    L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Beacon Roofing Supply has an analysts' consensus of $116.09 which suggests that it could grow by 14.28%. Given that Beacon Roofing Supply has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster, analysts believe Beacon Roofing Supply is more attractive than L.B. Foster.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0 0 0
    BECN
    Beacon Roofing Supply
    4 5 0
  • Is FSTR or BECN More Risky?

    L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Beacon Roofing Supply has a beta of 1.592, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 59.194%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSTR or BECN?

    L.B. Foster has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Beacon Roofing Supply offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. L.B. Foster pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Beacon Roofing Supply pays out 4.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Beacon Roofing Supply's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FSTR or BECN?

    L.B. Foster quarterly revenues are $137.5M, which are smaller than Beacon Roofing Supply quarterly revenues of $2.8B. L.B. Foster's net income of $35.9M is lower than Beacon Roofing Supply's net income of $145.3M. Notably, L.B. Foster's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Beacon Roofing Supply's PE ratio is 17.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster is 0.54x versus 0.67x for Beacon Roofing Supply. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0.54x 6.78x $137.5M $35.9M
    BECN
    Beacon Roofing Supply
    0.67x 17.37x $2.8B $145.3M
  • Which has Higher Returns FSTR or EVI?

    EVI Industries has a net margin of 26.12% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 3.45%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 28.12% beat EVI Industries's return on equity of 5.65%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    23.83% $3.27 $251M
    EVI
    EVI Industries
    30.82% $0.21 $156M
  • What do Analysts Say About FSTR or EVI?

    L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand EVI Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that L.B. Foster has higher upside potential than EVI Industries, analysts believe L.B. Foster is more attractive than EVI Industries.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0 0 0
    EVI
    EVI Industries
    0 0 0
  • Is FSTR or EVI More Risky?

    L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison EVI Industries has a beta of 0.346, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 65.448%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSTR or EVI?

    L.B. Foster has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. EVI Industries offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. L.B. Foster pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries pays out 72.1% of its earnings as a dividend. EVI Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FSTR or EVI?

    L.B. Foster quarterly revenues are $137.5M, which are larger than EVI Industries quarterly revenues of $93.6M. L.B. Foster's net income of $35.9M is higher than EVI Industries's net income of $3.2M. Notably, L.B. Foster's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while EVI Industries's PE ratio is 35.55x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster is 0.54x versus 0.64x for EVI Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0.54x 6.78x $137.5M $35.9M
    EVI
    EVI Industries
    0.64x 35.55x $93.6M $3.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns FSTR or GIC?

    Global Industrial has a net margin of 26.12% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 4.91%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 28.12% beat Global Industrial's return on equity of 25.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    23.83% $3.27 $251M
    GIC
    Global Industrial
    33.97% $0.44 $279.2M
  • What do Analysts Say About FSTR or GIC?

    L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Global Industrial has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 58.73%. Given that Global Industrial has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster, analysts believe Global Industrial is more attractive than L.B. Foster.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0 0 0
    GIC
    Global Industrial
    0 0 0
  • Is FSTR or GIC More Risky?

    L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Global Industrial has a beta of 0.864, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.56%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSTR or GIC?

    L.B. Foster has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Global Industrial offers a yield of 3.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. L.B. Foster pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial pays out 43.28% of its earnings as a dividend. Global Industrial's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FSTR or GIC?

    L.B. Foster quarterly revenues are $137.5M, which are smaller than Global Industrial quarterly revenues of $342.4M. L.B. Foster's net income of $35.9M is higher than Global Industrial's net income of $16.8M. Notably, L.B. Foster's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Global Industrial's PE ratio is 14.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster is 0.54x versus 0.72x for Global Industrial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0.54x 6.78x $137.5M $35.9M
    GIC
    Global Industrial
    0.72x 14.82x $342.4M $16.8M
  • Which has Higher Returns FSTR or RYI?

    Ryerson Holding has a net margin of 26.12% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of -0.59%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 28.12% beat Ryerson Holding's return on equity of 2.43%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    23.83% $3.27 $251M
    RYI
    Ryerson Holding
    17.93% -$0.20 $1.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About FSTR or RYI?

    L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Ryerson Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.83%. Given that Ryerson Holding has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster, analysts believe Ryerson Holding is more attractive than L.B. Foster.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0 0 0
    RYI
    Ryerson Holding
    0 0 0
  • Is FSTR or RYI More Risky?

    L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ryerson Holding has a beta of 1.544, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.356%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSTR or RYI?

    L.B. Foster has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Ryerson Holding offers a yield of 3.84% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.19 per share. L.B. Foster pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding pays out 17.02% of its earnings as a dividend. Ryerson Holding's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FSTR or RYI?

    L.B. Foster quarterly revenues are $137.5M, which are smaller than Ryerson Holding quarterly revenues of $1.1B. L.B. Foster's net income of $35.9M is higher than Ryerson Holding's net income of -$6.6M. Notably, L.B. Foster's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Ryerson Holding's PE ratio is 31.02x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster is 0.54x versus 0.14x for Ryerson Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0.54x 6.78x $137.5M $35.9M
    RYI
    Ryerson Holding
    0.14x 31.02x $1.1B -$6.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns FSTR or TRNS?

    Transcat has a net margin of 26.12% compared to L.B. Foster's net margin of 4.85%. L.B. Foster's return on equity of 28.12% beat Transcat's return on equity of 8.06%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    23.83% $3.27 $251M
    TRNS
    Transcat
    31.27% $0.35 $271.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About FSTR or TRNS?

    L.B. Foster has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 13.68%. On the other hand Transcat has an analysts' consensus of $123.20 which suggests that it could grow by 14.55%. Given that Transcat has higher upside potential than L.B. Foster, analysts believe Transcat is more attractive than L.B. Foster.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0 0 0
    TRNS
    Transcat
    3 0 0
  • Is FSTR or TRNS More Risky?

    L.B. Foster has a beta of 0.962, which suggesting that the stock is 3.809% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Transcat has a beta of 0.702, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.767%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock FSTR or TRNS?

    L.B. Foster has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Transcat offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. L.B. Foster pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Transcat pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios FSTR or TRNS?

    L.B. Foster quarterly revenues are $137.5M, which are larger than Transcat quarterly revenues of $67.8M. L.B. Foster's net income of $35.9M is higher than Transcat's net income of $3.3M. Notably, L.B. Foster's price-to-earnings ratio is 6.78x while Transcat's PE ratio is 52.64x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for L.B. Foster is 0.54x versus 3.53x for Transcat. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    FSTR
    L.B. Foster
    0.54x 6.78x $137.5M $35.9M
    TRNS
    Transcat
    3.53x 52.64x $67.8M $3.3M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret

It’s not often that a company with the scale and…

Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?

Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…

Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?

Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…

Stock Ideas

Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x

Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x

Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x

Alerts

Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21

Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.

Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21

Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.

Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21

Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock