Financhill
Sell
29

GFS Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$38.60
Seasonality move :
-16.72%
Day range:
$38.33 - $39.17
52-week range:
$35.85 - $61.98
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
29.93x
P/S ratio:
3.18x
P/B ratio:
1.98x
Volume:
1.2M
Avg. volume:
2.6M
1-year change:
-24.76%
Market cap:
$21.3B
Revenue:
$6.8B
EPS (TTM):
-$0.48

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES
$1.8B $0.45 1.9% 20.94% $47.81
INTC
Intel
$13.8B $0.12 -3.61% -81.02% $22.90
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor
$117.1M $0.19 -14.71% 100.83% $68.87
MCHP
Microchip Technology
$1.1B $0.28 -27.38% -62.79% $66.41
NVDA
NVIDIA
$38.1B $0.85 66.5% 55.48% $171.10
TXN
Texas Instruments
$3.9B $1.23 6.83% -7.94% $204.70
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES
$38.59 $47.81 $21.3B 29.93x $0.00 0% 3.18x
INTC
Intel
$24.12 $22.90 $104.4B 95.83x $0.13 2.07% 1.94x
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor
$62.33 $68.87 $8.6B 141.66x $0.00 0% 16.93x
MCHP
Microchip Technology
$54.57 $66.41 $29.3B 97.45x $0.46 3.33% 6.22x
NVDA
NVIDIA
$117.52 $171.10 $2.9T 40.00x $0.01 0.03% 22.34x
TXN
Texas Instruments
$179.45 $204.70 $163.4B 34.58x $1.36 2.97% 10.54x
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES
14.35% 1.345 7.6% 1.57x
INTC
Intel
33.5% 2.280 54.02% 0.72x
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor
-- 0.924 -- 2.18x
MCHP
Microchip Technology
52.81% 0.195 21.89% 1.08x
NVDA
NVIDIA
9.64% 1.547 0.29% 3.67x
TXN
Texas Instruments
44.58% 0.454 7.96% 2.55x
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES
$449M $235M -1.99% -2.39% 12.84% $322M
INTC
Intel
$5.6B $469M -11.64% -17.02% 5.84% -$2.7B
LSCC
Lattice Semiconductor
$71.8M $2.8M 8.76% 8.76% 2.41% $52.2M
MCHP
Microchip Technology
$561.4M $34.4M 2.43% 4.76% 2.03% $253.4M
NVDA
NVIDIA
$28.7B $24B 107.08% 123.32% 64.27% $15.6B
TXN
Texas Instruments
$2.3B $1.4B 15.78% 28.14% 37.16% $806M

GLOBALFOUNDRIES vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or INTC?

    Intel has a net margin of -39.89% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of -0.88%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.39% beat Intel's return on equity of -17.02%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    24.54% -$1.32 $12.6B
    INTC
    Intel
    39.16% -$0.03 $155B
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or INTC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $47.81, signalling upside risk potential of 23.88%. On the other hand Intel has an analysts' consensus of $22.90 which suggests that it could fall by -5.06%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES has higher upside potential than Intel, analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES is more attractive than Intel.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    7 8 2
    INTC
    Intel
    2 39 1
  • Is GFS or INTC More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intel has a beta of 1.027, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.678%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or INTC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Intel offers a yield of 2.07% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Intel pays out -8.53% of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or INTC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Intel quarterly revenues of $14.3B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M is lower than Intel's net income of -$126M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Intel's PE ratio is 95.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 3.18x versus 1.94x for Intel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    3.18x 29.93x $1.8B -$730M
    INTC
    Intel
    1.94x 95.83x $14.3B -$126M
  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or LSCC?

    Lattice Semiconductor has a net margin of -39.89% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of 14.06%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.39% beat Lattice Semiconductor's return on equity of 8.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    24.54% -$1.32 $12.6B
    LSCC
    Lattice Semiconductor
    61.11% $0.12 $710.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or LSCC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $47.81, signalling upside risk potential of 23.88%. On the other hand Lattice Semiconductor has an analysts' consensus of $68.87 which suggests that it could grow by 10.49%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES has higher upside potential than Lattice Semiconductor, analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES is more attractive than Lattice Semiconductor.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    7 8 2
    LSCC
    Lattice Semiconductor
    9 1 0
  • Is GFS or LSCC More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lattice Semiconductor has a beta of 1.433, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 43.343%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or LSCC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lattice Semiconductor offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lattice Semiconductor pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or LSCC?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Lattice Semiconductor quarterly revenues of $117.4M. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M is lower than Lattice Semiconductor's net income of $16.5M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Lattice Semiconductor's PE ratio is 141.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 3.18x versus 16.93x for Lattice Semiconductor. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    3.18x 29.93x $1.8B -$730M
    LSCC
    Lattice Semiconductor
    16.93x 141.66x $117.4M $16.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or MCHP?

    Microchip Technology has a net margin of -39.89% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of -5.22%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.39% beat Microchip Technology's return on equity of 4.76%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    24.54% -$1.32 $12.6B
    MCHP
    Microchip Technology
    54.72% -$0.10 $12.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or MCHP?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $47.81, signalling upside risk potential of 23.88%. On the other hand Microchip Technology has an analysts' consensus of $66.41 which suggests that it could grow by 21.69%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES has higher upside potential than Microchip Technology, analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES is more attractive than Microchip Technology.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    7 8 2
    MCHP
    Microchip Technology
    13 7 0
  • Is GFS or MCHP More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microchip Technology has a beta of 1.525, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 52.52%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or MCHP?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microchip Technology offers a yield of 3.33% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology pays out 47.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Microchip Technology's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or MCHP?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are larger than Microchip Technology quarterly revenues of $1B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M is lower than Microchip Technology's net income of -$53.6M. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Microchip Technology's PE ratio is 97.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 3.18x versus 6.22x for Microchip Technology. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    3.18x 29.93x $1.8B -$730M
    MCHP
    Microchip Technology
    6.22x 97.45x $1B -$53.6M
  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or NVDA?

    NVIDIA has a net margin of -39.89% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of 56.17%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.39% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 123.32%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    24.54% -$1.32 $12.6B
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    73.03% $0.89 $87.8B
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or NVDA?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $47.81, signalling upside risk potential of 23.88%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $171.10 which suggests that it could grow by 45.59%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than GLOBALFOUNDRIES, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than GLOBALFOUNDRIES.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    7 8 2
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    46 5 0
  • Is GFS or NVDA More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.766, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 76.633%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or NVDA?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.03% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.14% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or NVDA?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $39.3B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $22.1B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 40.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 3.18x versus 22.34x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    3.18x 29.93x $1.8B -$730M
    NVDA
    NVIDIA
    22.34x 40.00x $39.3B $22.1B
  • Which has Higher Returns GFS or TXN?

    Texas Instruments has a net margin of -39.89% compared to GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net margin of 30.07%. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's return on equity of -2.39% beat Texas Instruments's return on equity of 28.14%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    24.54% -$1.32 $12.6B
    TXN
    Texas Instruments
    57.75% $1.30 $30.5B
  • What do Analysts Say About GFS or TXN?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a consensus price target of $47.81, signalling upside risk potential of 23.88%. On the other hand Texas Instruments has an analysts' consensus of $204.70 which suggests that it could grow by 14.07%. Given that GLOBALFOUNDRIES has higher upside potential than Texas Instruments, analysts believe GLOBALFOUNDRIES is more attractive than Texas Instruments.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    7 8 2
    TXN
    Texas Instruments
    10 20 1
  • Is GFS or TXN More Risky?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Texas Instruments has a beta of 0.975, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.454%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock GFS or TXN?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Texas Instruments offers a yield of 2.97% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.36 per share. GLOBALFOUNDRIES pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments pays out 99.92% of its earnings as a dividend. Texas Instruments's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios GFS or TXN?

    GLOBALFOUNDRIES quarterly revenues are $1.8B, which are smaller than Texas Instruments quarterly revenues of $4B. GLOBALFOUNDRIES's net income of -$730M is lower than Texas Instruments's net income of $1.2B. Notably, GLOBALFOUNDRIES's price-to-earnings ratio is 29.93x while Texas Instruments's PE ratio is 34.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for GLOBALFOUNDRIES is 3.18x versus 10.54x for Texas Instruments. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    GFS
    GLOBALFOUNDRIES
    3.18x 29.93x $1.8B -$730M
    TXN
    Texas Instruments
    10.54x 34.58x $4B $1.2B

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is Shopify a Millionaire Maker?
Is Shopify a Millionaire Maker?

Shopify (NYSE:SHOP) is an eCommerce platform, business services provider and…

Is Alphabet Stock No Longer a Good Bet?
Is Alphabet Stock No Longer a Good Bet?

Alphabet tripled its price per share over the past 5…

Pepsi Vs Coke Stock: Which Is Best?
Pepsi Vs Coke Stock: Which Is Best?

Coca-Cola (NYSE:KO) and PepsiCo (NYSE:PEP) are two of the largest…

Stock Ideas

Buy
52
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Sell
50
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 40x

Alerts

Sell
50
RGC alert for Mar 20

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is down 0.66% over the past day.

Buy
82
EXOD alert for Mar 20

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is up 35.1% over the past day.

Sell
50
SRPT alert for Mar 20

Sarepta Therapeutics [SRPT] is up 8.72% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock