Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
47
GSM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.87
Seasonality move
:
12.95%
Day range:
$3.75 - $3.94
52-week range:
$3.75 - $6.78
Dividend yield:
1.35%
P/E ratio:
16.10x
P/S ratio:
0.44x
P/B ratio:
0.91x
Volume:
2.4M
Avg. volume:
1.3M
1-year change:
-38.75%
Market cap:
$726.2M
Revenue:
$1.7B
EPS (TTM):
$0.24
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$443.5M | $0.21 | 4.54% | -66.67% | -- |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
$10.6B | $1.96 | -2.78% | 123.66% | $93.86 |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | $82.20 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$3.87 | -- | $726.2M | 16.10x | $0.01 | 1.35% | 0.44x |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
$0.05 | -- | $26.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 5.41x |
|
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
|
$2.6600 | -- | $550.3M | 55.37x | $0.01 | 1.46% | 1.37x |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
|
$1.45 | -- | $571.2M | 63.63x | $0.02 | 4.46% | 1.27x |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
$73.50 | $93.86 | $23.9B | 11.19x | $1.34 | 7.17% | 0.59x |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
$58.64 | $82.20 | $95.2B | 8.91x | $1.77 | 7.42% | 1.77x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
8.7% | 0.567 | 8.68% | 0.90x |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
-- | 0.284 | -- | 3.53x |
|
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
|
34.09% | 0.075 | 40.25% | 0.69x |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
|
26.8% | 1.096 | 32.06% | 0.51x |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
45.08% | 0.530 | 36.01% | 1.10x |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
18.91% | -0.225 | 11.82% | 1.16x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
GSM
Ferroglobe PLC
|
$159.6M | $40.6M | 4.42% | 4.65% | 7.85% | -$10M |
|
EDNSF
Eden Research PLC
|
-- | -- | -14.46% | -14.46% | -- | -- |
|
FTTRF
Forterra PLC
|
-- | -- | 2.59% | 3.76% | -- | -- |
|
IBJHF
Ibstock PLC
|
-- | -- | 1.37% | 1.8% | -- | -- |
|
LYB
LyondellBasell Industries NV
|
$1.2B | $807M | 8.76% | 16.1% | 8.03% | $302M |
|
RIO
Rio Tinto PLC
|
-- | -- | 15.69% | 19.33% | -- | -- |
Ferroglobe PLC vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or EDNSF?
Eden Research PLC has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat Eden Research PLC's return on equity of -14.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC36.81% $0.10 $869.6M EDNSFEden Research PLC-- -- $16.1M -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or EDNSF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 132.86%. On the other hand Eden Research PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Eden Research PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Eden Research PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC0 0 0 EDNSFEden Research PLC0 0 0 -
Is GSM or EDNSF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Eden Research PLC has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or EDNSF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Eden Research PLC offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Eden Research PLC pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or EDNSF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are larger than Eden Research PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is higher than Eden Research PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.10x while Eden Research PLC's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.44x versus 5.41x for Eden Research PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.44x 16.10x $433.5M $18.8M EDNSFEden Research PLC5.41x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or FTTRF?
Forterra PLC has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat Forterra PLC's return on equity of 3.76%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC36.81% $0.10 $869.6M FTTRFForterra PLC-- -- $417.8M -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or FTTRF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 132.86%. On the other hand Forterra PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Forterra PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Forterra PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC0 0 0 FTTRFForterra PLC0 0 0 -
Is GSM or FTTRF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forterra PLC has a beta of 1,260.713, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 125971.325%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or FTTRF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Forterra PLC offers a yield of 1.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forterra PLC pays out 200.78% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or FTTRF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are larger than Forterra PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is higher than Forterra PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.10x while Forterra PLC's PE ratio is 55.37x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.44x versus 1.37x for Forterra PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.44x 16.10x $433.5M $18.8M FTTRFForterra PLC1.37x 55.37x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or IBJHF?
Ibstock PLC has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat Ibstock PLC's return on equity of 1.8%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC36.81% $0.10 $869.6M IBJHFIbstock PLC-- -- $681.5M -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or IBJHF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 132.86%. On the other hand Ibstock PLC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Ibstock PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Ibstock PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC0 0 0 IBJHFIbstock PLC0 0 0 -
Is GSM or IBJHF More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Ibstock PLC has a beta of 0.485, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 51.527%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or IBJHF?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Ibstock PLC offers a yield of 4.46% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.02 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Ibstock PLC pays out 165.75% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or IBJHF?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are larger than Ibstock PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is higher than Ibstock PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.10x while Ibstock PLC's PE ratio is 63.63x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.44x versus 1.27x for Ibstock PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.44x 16.10x $433.5M $18.8M IBJHFIbstock PLC1.27x 63.63x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or LYB?
LyondellBasell Industries NV has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of 5.52%. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat LyondellBasell Industries NV's return on equity of 16.1%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC36.81% $0.10 $869.6M LYBLyondellBasell Industries NV12.03% $1.75 $25.1B -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or LYB?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 132.86%. On the other hand LyondellBasell Industries NV has an analysts' consensus of $93.86 which suggests that it could grow by 27.7%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than LyondellBasell Industries NV, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than LyondellBasell Industries NV.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC0 0 0 LYBLyondellBasell Industries NV4 12 1 -
Is GSM or LYB More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LyondellBasell Industries NV has a beta of 1.057, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.664%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or LYB?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. LyondellBasell Industries NV offers a yield of 7.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.34 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. LyondellBasell Industries NV pays out 76.16% of its earnings as a dividend. LyondellBasell Industries NV's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or LYB?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are smaller than LyondellBasell Industries NV quarterly revenues of $10.3B. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is lower than LyondellBasell Industries NV's net income of $570M. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.10x while LyondellBasell Industries NV's PE ratio is 11.19x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.44x versus 0.59x for LyondellBasell Industries NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.44x 16.10x $433.5M $18.8M LYBLyondellBasell Industries NV0.59x 11.19x $10.3B $570M
-
Which has Higher Returns GSM or RIO?
Rio Tinto PLC has a net margin of 4.34% compared to Ferroglobe PLC's net margin of --. Ferroglobe PLC's return on equity of 4.65% beat Rio Tinto PLC's return on equity of 19.33%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital GSMFerroglobe PLC36.81% $0.10 $869.6M RIORio Tinto PLC-- -- $70B -
What do Analysts Say About GSM or RIO?
Ferroglobe PLC has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 132.86%. On the other hand Rio Tinto PLC has an analysts' consensus of $82.20 which suggests that it could grow by 40.18%. Given that Ferroglobe PLC has higher upside potential than Rio Tinto PLC, analysts believe Ferroglobe PLC is more attractive than Rio Tinto PLC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings GSMFerroglobe PLC0 0 0 RIORio Tinto PLC5 0 0 -
Is GSM or RIO More Risky?
Ferroglobe PLC has a beta of 1.857, which suggesting that the stock is 85.658% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Rio Tinto PLC has a beta of 0.652, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.849%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock GSM or RIO?
Ferroglobe PLC has a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.35%. Rio Tinto PLC offers a yield of 7.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.77 per share. Ferroglobe PLC pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC pays out 64.33% of its earnings as a dividend. Rio Tinto PLC's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios GSM or RIO?
Ferroglobe PLC quarterly revenues are $433.5M, which are larger than Rio Tinto PLC quarterly revenues of --. Ferroglobe PLC's net income of $18.8M is higher than Rio Tinto PLC's net income of --. Notably, Ferroglobe PLC's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.10x while Rio Tinto PLC's PE ratio is 8.91x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Ferroglobe PLC is 0.44x versus 1.77x for Rio Tinto PLC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income GSMFerroglobe PLC0.44x 16.10x $433.5M $18.8M RIORio Tinto PLC1.77x 8.91x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 7.65% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 11.85% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 0.5% over the past day.
