Is ARK Next Generation Internet ETF a Good Investment?
The ARK Next Generation Internet ETF looks like a pretty…
Sell
37
HIHO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$1.94
Seasonality move
:
9.63%
Day range:
$1.92 - $1.95
52-week range:
$1.70 - $2.88
Dividend yield:
6.22%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
1.13x
P/B ratio:
1.25x
Volume:
7.9K
Avg. volume:
14.5K
1-year change:
-4.69%
Market cap:
$8.5M
Revenue:
$6.3M
EPS (TTM):
-$0.12
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$1.93 | -- | $8.5M | -- | $0.05 | 6.22% | 1.13x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
$0.75 | -- | $7.4M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 38.32x |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
$1.45 | -- | $11.2M | 4.86x | $0.08 | 0% | 0.65x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
$0.86 | -- | $15.5M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 1.73x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
$0.69 | -- | $10.7M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 8.67x |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
$1.61 | -- | $24.3M | 98.50x | $0.00 | 0% | 3.16x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
-- | 0.152 | 0.54% | 2.04x |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | 0.512 | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -0.035 | -- | 1.59x |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
2.59% | -1.022 | 5.34% | 1.88x |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | 0.000 | -- | 6.29x |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
0.03% | 1.899 | 22.6% | 1.76x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HIHO
Highway Holdings
|
$834K | $110K | -7.29% | -7.17% | 5.2% | -- |
|
CHNR
China Natural Resources
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
CLWT
Euro Tech Holdings
|
-- | -- | 13.66% | 13.71% | -- | -- |
|
ILAG
Intelligent Living Application Group
|
-- | -- | -17.65% | -18.39% | -- | -- |
|
ROMA
Roma Green Finance
|
-- | -- | -55.86% | -55.86% | -- | -- |
|
WLGS
WANG & LEE Group
|
-- | -- | 0.01% | 0.01% | -- | -- |
Highway Holdings vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or CHNR?
China Natural Resources has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Highway Holdings's net margin of --. Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17% beat China Natural Resources's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M CHNRChina Natural Resources-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or CHNR?
Highway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand China Natural Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings has higher upside potential than China Natural Resources, analysts believe Highway Holdings is more attractive than China Natural Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 CHNRChina Natural Resources0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or CHNR More Risky?
Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 95.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison China Natural Resources has a beta of 0.649, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.061%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or CHNR?
Highway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.22%. China Natural Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings pays -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. China Natural Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or CHNR?
Highway Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are larger than China Natural Resources quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings's net income of $231K is higher than China Natural Resources's net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while China Natural Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings is 1.13x versus 38.32x for China Natural Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings1.13x -- $2.1M $231K CHNRChina Natural Resources38.32x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or CLWT?
Euro Tech Holdings has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Highway Holdings's net margin of --. Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17% beat Euro Tech Holdings's return on equity of 13.71%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M CLWTEuro Tech Holdings-- -- $15.8M -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or CLWT?
Highway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Euro Tech Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings has higher upside potential than Euro Tech Holdings, analysts believe Highway Holdings is more attractive than Euro Tech Holdings.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or CLWT More Risky?
Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 95.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Euro Tech Holdings has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.246%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or CLWT?
Highway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.22%. Euro Tech Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Highway Holdings pays -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings pays out 0.77% of its earnings as a dividend. Euro Tech Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or CLWT?
Highway Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are larger than Euro Tech Holdings quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings's net income of $231K is higher than Euro Tech Holdings's net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Euro Tech Holdings's PE ratio is 4.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings is 1.13x versus 0.65x for Euro Tech Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings1.13x -- $2.1M $231K CLWTEuro Tech Holdings0.65x 4.86x -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or ILAG?
Intelligent Living Application Group has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Highway Holdings's net margin of --. Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17% beat Intelligent Living Application Group's return on equity of -18.39%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group-- -- $14.5M -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or ILAG?
Highway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Intelligent Living Application Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings has higher upside potential than Intelligent Living Application Group, analysts believe Highway Holdings is more attractive than Intelligent Living Application Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or ILAG More Risky?
Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 95.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Intelligent Living Application Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or ILAG?
Highway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.22%. Intelligent Living Application Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings pays -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Intelligent Living Application Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or ILAG?
Highway Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are larger than Intelligent Living Application Group quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings's net income of $231K is higher than Intelligent Living Application Group's net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Intelligent Living Application Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings is 1.13x versus 1.73x for Intelligent Living Application Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings1.13x -- $2.1M $231K ILAGIntelligent Living Application Group1.73x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or ROMA?
Roma Green Finance has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Highway Holdings's net margin of --. Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17% beat Roma Green Finance's return on equity of -55.86%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M ROMARoma Green Finance-- -- $7.6M -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or ROMA?
Highway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand Roma Green Finance has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings has higher upside potential than Roma Green Finance, analysts believe Highway Holdings is more attractive than Roma Green Finance.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 ROMARoma Green Finance0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or ROMA More Risky?
Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 95.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Roma Green Finance has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or ROMA?
Highway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.22%. Roma Green Finance offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings pays -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Roma Green Finance pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or ROMA?
Highway Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are larger than Roma Green Finance quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings's net income of $231K is higher than Roma Green Finance's net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Roma Green Finance's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings is 1.13x versus 8.67x for Roma Green Finance. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings1.13x -- $2.1M $231K ROMARoma Green Finance8.67x -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns HIHO or WLGS?
WANG & LEE Group has a net margin of 10.91% compared to Highway Holdings's net margin of --. Highway Holdings's return on equity of -7.17% beat WANG & LEE Group's return on equity of 0.01%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital HIHOHighway Holdings39.4% $0.05 $6.8M WLGSWANG & LEE Group-- -- $8.3B -
What do Analysts Say About HIHO or WLGS?
Highway Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand WANG & LEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Highway Holdings has higher upside potential than WANG & LEE Group, analysts believe Highway Holdings is more attractive than WANG & LEE Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings HIHOHighway Holdings0 0 0 WLGSWANG & LEE Group0 0 0 -
Is HIHO or WLGS More Risky?
Highway Holdings has a beta of 0.045, which suggesting that the stock is 95.546% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison WANG & LEE Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock HIHO or WLGS?
Highway Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.05 per share corresponding to a yield of 6.22%. WANG & LEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Highway Holdings pays -64.23% of its earnings as a dividend. WANG & LEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios HIHO or WLGS?
Highway Holdings quarterly revenues are $2.1M, which are larger than WANG & LEE Group quarterly revenues of --. Highway Holdings's net income of $231K is higher than WANG & LEE Group's net income of --. Notably, Highway Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while WANG & LEE Group's PE ratio is 98.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Highway Holdings is 1.13x versus 3.16x for WANG & LEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income HIHOHighway Holdings1.13x -- $2.1M $231K WLGSWANG & LEE Group3.16x 98.50x -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Why Is Marvell Stock Up?
Semiconductor and data infrastructure company Marvell Technology (NASDAQ:MRVL) absolutely trounced…
Why Is General Electric Stock Going Up?
General Electric Company, doing business these days as GE Aerospace…
Stock Ideas
Sell
40
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.7T
P/E Ratio: 40x
Buy
51
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 117x
Sell
44
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Alerts
Sell
1
IONQ alert for Jan 10
IonQ [IONQ] is up 6.91% over the past day.
Sell
45
COLL alert for Jan 10
Collegium Pharmaceutical [COLL] is down 2.31% over the past day.
Sell
30
EDN alert for Jan 10
Empresa Distribuidora y Comercializadora Norte SA [EDN] is down 0.85% over the past day.
