HOFT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Document Security Systems has a net margin of -3.96% compared to Hooker Furnishings's net margin of --. Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37% beat Document Security Systems's return on equity of --.

Hooker Furnishings has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.82%. On the other hand Document Security Systems has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Hooker Furnishings has higher upside potential than Document Security Systems, analysts believe Hooker Furnishings is more attractive than Document Security Systems.

Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Document Security Systems has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Hooker Furnishings has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.9%. Document Security Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hooker Furnishings pays 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Document Security Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues are $104.4M, which are larger than Document Security Systems quarterly revenues of --. Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M is higher than Document Security Systems's net income of --. Notably, Hooker Furnishings's price-to-earnings ratio is 121.85x while Document Security Systems's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hooker Furnishings is 0.32x versus -- for Document Security Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of -3.96% compared to Hooker Furnishings's net margin of 8.35%. Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37% beat Flexsteel Industries's return on equity of 13.18%.

Hooker Furnishings has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.82%. On the other hand Flexsteel Industries has an analysts' consensus of $61.00 which suggests that it could grow by 59.27%. Given that Hooker Furnishings has higher upside potential than Flexsteel Industries, analysts believe Hooker Furnishings is more attractive than Flexsteel Industries.

Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.307, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 69.3%.

Hooker Furnishings has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.9%. Flexsteel Industries offers a yield of 1.67% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share. Hooker Furnishings pays 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 30.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues are $104.4M, which are smaller than Flexsteel Industries quarterly revenues of $108.5M. Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Flexsteel Industries's net income of $9.1M. Notably, Hooker Furnishings's price-to-earnings ratio is 121.85x while Flexsteel Industries's PE ratio is 10.70x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hooker Furnishings is 0.32x versus 0.50x for Flexsteel Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a net margin of -3.96% compared to Hooker Furnishings's net margin of 1.54%. Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37% beat Goodyear Tire & Rubber's return on equity of 1.44%.

Hooker Furnishings has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.82%. On the other hand Goodyear Tire & Rubber has an analysts' consensus of $11.54 which suggests that it could grow by 26.26%. Given that Hooker Furnishings has higher upside potential than Goodyear Tire & Rubber, analysts believe Hooker Furnishings is more attractive than Goodyear Tire & Rubber.

Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Goodyear Tire & Rubber has a beta of 1.707, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 70.69%.

Hooker Furnishings has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.9%. Goodyear Tire & Rubber offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hooker Furnishings pays 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Goodyear Tire & Rubber pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues are $104.4M, which are smaller than Goodyear Tire & Rubber quarterly revenues of $4.9B. Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Goodyear Tire & Rubber's net income of $76M. Notably, Hooker Furnishings's price-to-earnings ratio is 121.85x while Goodyear Tire & Rubber's PE ratio is 38.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hooker Furnishings is 0.32x versus 0.14x for Goodyear Tire & Rubber. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Yunhong Green CTI has a net margin of -3.96% compared to Hooker Furnishings's net margin of -46.97%. Hooker Furnishings's return on equity of -4.37% beat Yunhong Green CTI's return on equity of -25.74%.

Hooker Furnishings has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 71.82%. On the other hand Yunhong Green CTI has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 525.45%. Given that Yunhong Green CTI has higher upside potential than Hooker Furnishings, analysts believe Yunhong Green CTI is more attractive than Hooker Furnishings.

Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.164, which suggesting that the stock is 16.417% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Yunhong Green CTI has a beta of 1.007, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.66999999999999%.

Hooker Furnishings has a quarterly dividend of $0.23 per share corresponding to a yield of 7.9%. Yunhong Green CTI offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Hooker Furnishings pays 98.15% of its earnings as a dividend. Yunhong Green CTI pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hooker Furnishings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Hooker Furnishings quarterly revenues are $104.4M, which are larger than Yunhong Green CTI quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Hooker Furnishings's net income of -$4.1M is lower than Yunhong Green CTI's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Hooker Furnishings's price-to-earnings ratio is 121.85x while Yunhong Green CTI's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Hooker Furnishings is 0.32x versus 1.33x for Yunhong Green CTI. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.