HSII Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

GEE Group has a net margin of -5.33% compared to Heidrick & Struggles International's net margin of -2.66%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 1.88% beat GEE Group's return on equity of -24.94%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.48%. On the other hand GEE Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 834.58%. Given that GEE Group has higher upside potential than Heidrick & Struggles International, analysts believe GEE Group is more attractive than Heidrick & Struggles International.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.734% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison GEE Group has a beta of 0.521, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 47.877%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. GEE Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Heidrick & Struggles International pays 148.06% of its earnings as a dividend. GEE Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Heidrick & Struggles International quarterly revenues are $280.9M, which are larger than GEE Group quarterly revenues of $26M. Heidrick & Struggles International's net income of -$15M is lower than GEE Group's net income of -$692K. Notably, Heidrick & Struggles International's price-to-earnings ratio is 106.40x while GEE Group's PE ratio is 6.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidrick & Struggles International is 0.80x versus 0.21x for GEE Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kelly Services has a net margin of -5.33% compared to Heidrick & Struggles International's net margin of -2.67%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 1.88% beat Kelly Services's return on equity of -0.05%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.48%. On the other hand Kelly Services has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 108.17%. Given that Kelly Services has higher upside potential than Heidrick & Struggles International, analysts believe Kelly Services is more attractive than Heidrick & Struggles International.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.734% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kelly Services has a beta of 1.135, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.535%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Kelly Services offers a yield of 2.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Heidrick & Struggles International pays 148.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Kelly Services pays out -1816.67% of its earnings as a dividend.

Heidrick & Struggles International quarterly revenues are $280.9M, which are smaller than Kelly Services quarterly revenues of $1.2B. Heidrick & Struggles International's net income of -$15M is higher than Kelly Services's net income of -$31.8M. Notably, Heidrick & Struggles International's price-to-earnings ratio is 106.40x while Kelly Services's PE ratio is 12.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidrick & Struggles International is 0.80x versus 0.11x for Kelly Services. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Korn Ferry has a net margin of -5.33% compared to Heidrick & Struggles International's net margin of 8.63%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 1.88% beat Korn Ferry's return on equity of 14.06%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.48%. On the other hand Korn Ferry has an analysts' consensus of $81.25 which suggests that it could grow by 22.25%. Given that Korn Ferry has higher upside potential than Heidrick & Struggles International, analysts believe Korn Ferry is more attractive than Heidrick & Struggles International.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.734% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Korn Ferry has a beta of 1.573, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 57.288%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Korn Ferry offers a yield of 2.17% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.37 per share. Heidrick & Struggles International pays 148.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Korn Ferry pays out 32.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Korn Ferry's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Heidrick & Struggles International's is not.

Heidrick & Struggles International quarterly revenues are $280.9M, which are smaller than Korn Ferry quarterly revenues of $676.5M. Heidrick & Struggles International's net income of -$15M is lower than Korn Ferry's net income of $58.4M. Notably, Heidrick & Struggles International's price-to-earnings ratio is 106.40x while Korn Ferry's PE ratio is 14.29x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidrick & Struggles International is 0.80x versus 1.27x for Korn Ferry. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mastech Digital has a net margin of -5.33% compared to Heidrick & Struggles International's net margin of 0.59%. Heidrick & Struggles International's return on equity of 1.88% beat Mastech Digital's return on equity of 4.04%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a consensus price target of $50.00, signalling upside risk potential of 17.48%. On the other hand Mastech Digital has an analysts' consensus of $15.50 which suggests that it could grow by 68.66%. Given that Mastech Digital has higher upside potential than Heidrick & Struggles International, analysts believe Mastech Digital is more attractive than Heidrick & Struggles International.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a beta of 0.803, which suggesting that the stock is 19.734% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mastech Digital has a beta of 0.775, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 22.517%.

Heidrick & Struggles International has a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.41%. Mastech Digital offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Heidrick & Struggles International pays 148.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Mastech Digital pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Heidrick & Struggles International quarterly revenues are $280.9M, which are larger than Mastech Digital quarterly revenues of $50.7M. Heidrick & Struggles International's net income of -$15M is lower than Mastech Digital's net income of $297K. Notably, Heidrick & Struggles International's price-to-earnings ratio is 106.40x while Mastech Digital's PE ratio is 31.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Heidrick & Struggles International is 0.80x versus 0.55x for Mastech Digital. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.