IIIV Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

ePlus has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 4.72%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat ePlus's return on equity of 11.36%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.86, signalling upside risk potential of 32.66%. On the other hand ePlus has an analysts' consensus of $81.00 which suggests that it could grow by 25.87%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than ePlus, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than ePlus.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.216% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison ePlus has a beta of 1.152, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.16%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. ePlus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. ePlus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than ePlus quarterly revenues of $511M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is lower than ePlus's net income of $24.1M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.35x while ePlus's PE ratio is 16.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.31x versus 0.81x for ePlus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Red Violet has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 4.41%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat Red Violet's return on equity of 8.03%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.86, signalling upside risk potential of 32.66%. On the other hand Red Violet has an analysts' consensus of $46.00 which suggests that it could grow by 19.2%. Given that i3 Verticals has higher upside potential than Red Violet, analysts believe i3 Verticals is more attractive than Red Violet.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.216% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Red Violet has a beta of 1.629, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.902%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Red Violet offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Violet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are larger than Red Violet quarterly revenues of $19.6M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is higher than Red Violet's net income of $863K. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.35x while Red Violet's PE ratio is 75.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.31x versus 7.24x for Red Violet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tenable Holdings has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of 0.79%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat Tenable Holdings's return on equity of -9.69%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.86, signalling upside risk potential of 32.66%. On the other hand Tenable Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $48.56 which suggests that it could grow by 33.18%. Given that Tenable Holdings has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe Tenable Holdings is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.216% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tenable Holdings has a beta of 0.869, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.059%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tenable Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tenable Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than Tenable Holdings quarterly revenues of $235.7M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is higher than Tenable Holdings's net income of $1.9M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.35x while Tenable Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.31x versus 4.85x for Tenable Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Upland Software has a net margin of 3.33% compared to i3 Verticals's net margin of -5.04%. i3 Verticals's return on equity of 27.8% beat Upland Software's return on equity of -76.42%.

i3 Verticals has a consensus price target of $31.86, signalling upside risk potential of 32.66%. On the other hand Upland Software has an analysts' consensus of $4.25 which suggests that it could grow by 34.92%. Given that Upland Software has higher upside potential than i3 Verticals, analysts believe Upland Software is more attractive than i3 Verticals.

i3 Verticals has a beta of 1.522, which suggesting that the stock is 52.216% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Upland Software has a beta of 1.403, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.291%.

i3 Verticals has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Upland Software offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. i3 Verticals pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Upland Software pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

i3 Verticals quarterly revenues are $61.7M, which are smaller than Upland Software quarterly revenues of $68M. i3 Verticals's net income of $2.1M is higher than Upland Software's net income of -$3.4M. Notably, i3 Verticals's price-to-earnings ratio is 5.35x while Upland Software's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for i3 Verticals is 2.31x versus 0.32x for Upland Software. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.