INVE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Apogee Enterprises has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Identiv's net margin of 6.15%. Identiv's return on equity of 71.9% beat Apogee Enterprises's return on equity of 20.18%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of $6.83, signalling upside risk potential of 101.57%. On the other hand Apogee Enterprises has an analysts' consensus of $66.00 which suggests that it could grow by 41.33%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Apogee Enterprises, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Apogee Enterprises.

Identiv has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apogee Enterprises has a beta of 1.041, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.147%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Apogee Enterprises offers a yield of 2.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.26 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises pays out 21.22% of its earnings as a dividend. Apogee Enterprises's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.7M, which are smaller than Apogee Enterprises quarterly revenues of $341.3M. Identiv's net income of -$355K is lower than Apogee Enterprises's net income of $21M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.12x while Apogee Enterprises's PE ratio is 10.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 1.88x versus 0.75x for Apogee Enterprises. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Armstrong World Industries has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Identiv's net margin of 16.92%. Identiv's return on equity of 71.9% beat Armstrong World Industries's return on equity of 39.4%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of $6.83, signalling upside risk potential of 101.57%. On the other hand Armstrong World Industries has an analysts' consensus of $164.00 which suggests that it could grow by 16.26%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Armstrong World Industries, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Armstrong World Industries.

Identiv has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Armstrong World Industries has a beta of 1.247, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.668%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Armstrong World Industries offers a yield of 0.83% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.31 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries pays out 19.1% of its earnings as a dividend. Armstrong World Industries's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.7M, which are smaller than Armstrong World Industries quarterly revenues of $367.7M. Identiv's net income of -$355K is lower than Armstrong World Industries's net income of $62.2M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.12x while Armstrong World Industries's PE ratio is 23.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 1.88x versus 4.29x for Armstrong World Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of -5.3% compared to Identiv's net margin of -1.56%. Identiv's return on equity of 71.9% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -49.21%.

Identiv has a consensus price target of $6.83, signalling upside risk potential of 101.57%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 41.96%. Given that Identiv has higher upside potential than Southland Holdings, analysts believe Identiv is more attractive than Southland Holdings.

Identiv has a beta of 1.379, which suggesting that the stock is 37.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Identiv has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Identiv pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Identiv quarterly revenues are $6.7M, which are smaller than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $267.3M. Identiv's net income of -$355K is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Identiv's price-to-earnings ratio is 1.12x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Identiv is 1.88x versus 0.16x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.