JAKK Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Hasbro has a net margin of -6.97% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of -3.11%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.92% beat Hasbro's return on equity of 33.33%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 70.1%. On the other hand Hasbro has an analysts' consensus of $79.09 which suggests that it could grow by 30.47%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Hasbro, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Hasbro.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hasbro has a beta of 0.507, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 49.327%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Hasbro offers a yield of 4.62% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.70 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hasbro pays out 101.12% of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $130.7M, which are smaller than Hasbro quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$9.1M is higher than Hasbro's net income of -$34.3M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.40x while Hasbro's PE ratio is 22.04x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.41x versus 2.06x for Hasbro. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mattel has a net margin of -6.97% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of 8.56%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.92% beat Mattel's return on equity of 25.26%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 70.1%. On the other hand Mattel has an analysts' consensus of $25.58 which suggests that it could grow by 27.05%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than Mattel, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than Mattel.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mattel has a beta of 0.655, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.545%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. Mattel offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mattel pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $130.7M, which are smaller than Mattel quarterly revenues of $1.6B. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$9.1M is lower than Mattel's net income of $140.9M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.40x while Mattel's PE ratio is 12.58x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.41x versus 1.28x for Mattel. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

PLBY Group has a net margin of -6.97% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of -15.06%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.92% beat PLBY Group's return on equity of -596.01%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 70.1%. On the other hand PLBY Group has an analysts' consensus of $2.05 which suggests that it could grow by 69.42%. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than PLBY Group, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than PLBY Group.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison PLBY Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. PLBY Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. PLBY Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $130.7M, which are larger than PLBY Group quarterly revenues of $83.3M. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$9.1M is higher than PLBY Group's net income of -$12.5M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.40x while PLBY Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.41x versus 0.62x for PLBY Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SRM Entertainment has a net margin of -6.97% compared to Jakks Pacific's net margin of -128.81%. Jakks Pacific's return on equity of 15.92% beat SRM Entertainment's return on equity of -112.23%.

Jakks Pacific has a consensus price target of $43.00, signalling upside risk potential of 70.1%. On the other hand SRM Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Jakks Pacific has higher upside potential than SRM Entertainment, analysts believe Jakks Pacific is more attractive than SRM Entertainment.

Jakks Pacific has a beta of 2.147, which suggesting that the stock is 114.673% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SRM Entertainment has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Jakks Pacific has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.99%. SRM Entertainment offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jakks Pacific pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SRM Entertainment pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jakks Pacific quarterly revenues are $130.7M, which are larger than SRM Entertainment quarterly revenues of $876.4K. Jakks Pacific's net income of -$9.1M is lower than SRM Entertainment's net income of -$1.1M. Notably, Jakks Pacific's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.40x while SRM Entertainment's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jakks Pacific is 0.41x versus 0.89x for SRM Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.