JAMF Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Blackbaud has a net margin of -10.08% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of -109.44%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.61% beat Blackbaud's return on equity of -54.32%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of $19.80, signalling upside risk potential of 50.34%. On the other hand Blackbaud has an analysts' consensus of $78.60 which suggests that it could grow by 20.92%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Blackbaud, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Blackbaud.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Blackbaud has a beta of 1.085, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.46%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Blackbaud offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Blackbaud pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $163M, which are smaller than Blackbaud quarterly revenues of $302.2M. Jamf Holding's net income of -$16.4M is higher than Blackbaud's net income of -$330.8M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Blackbaud's PE ratio is 69.57x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 2.69x versus 2.81x for Blackbaud. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CommVault Systems has a net margin of -10.08% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of 4.2%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.61% beat CommVault Systems's return on equity of 65.85%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of $19.80, signalling upside risk potential of 50.34%. On the other hand CommVault Systems has an analysts' consensus of $179.79 which suggests that it could grow by 11.31%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than CommVault Systems, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than CommVault Systems.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CommVault Systems has a beta of 0.618, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 38.189%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CommVault Systems offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CommVault Systems pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $163M, which are smaller than CommVault Systems quarterly revenues of $262.6M. Jamf Holding's net income of -$16.4M is lower than CommVault Systems's net income of $11M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CommVault Systems's PE ratio is 42.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 2.69x versus 7.73x for CommVault Systems. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DocuSign has a net margin of -10.08% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of 10.76%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.61% beat DocuSign's return on equity of 64.96%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of $19.80, signalling upside risk potential of 50.34%. On the other hand DocuSign has an analysts' consensus of $95.64 which suggests that it could grow by 8.61%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than DocuSign, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than DocuSign.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DocuSign has a beta of 1.024, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.369%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. DocuSign offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. DocuSign pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $163M, which are smaller than DocuSign quarterly revenues of $776.3M. Jamf Holding's net income of -$16.4M is lower than DocuSign's net income of $83.5M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while DocuSign's PE ratio is 17.23x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 2.69x versus 6.20x for DocuSign. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Paylocity Holding has a net margin of -10.08% compared to Jamf Holding's net margin of 9.94%. Jamf Holding's return on equity of -9.61% beat Paylocity Holding's return on equity of 19.09%.

Jamf Holding has a consensus price target of $19.80, signalling upside risk potential of 50.34%. On the other hand Paylocity Holding has an analysts' consensus of $240.43 which suggests that it could grow by 25.47%. Given that Jamf Holding has higher upside potential than Paylocity Holding, analysts believe Jamf Holding is more attractive than Paylocity Holding.

Jamf Holding has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paylocity Holding has a beta of 0.940, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 5.99%.

Jamf Holding has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Paylocity Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Jamf Holding pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Paylocity Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Jamf Holding quarterly revenues are $163M, which are smaller than Paylocity Holding quarterly revenues of $377M. Jamf Holding's net income of -$16.4M is lower than Paylocity Holding's net income of $37.5M. Notably, Jamf Holding's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Paylocity Holding's PE ratio is 52.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Jamf Holding is 2.69x versus 7.52x for Paylocity Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.