LMB Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

CECO Environmental has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 1.54%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 20.67% beat CECO Environmental's return on equity of 5.03%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.8%. On the other hand CECO Environmental has an analysts' consensus of $35.00 which suggests that it could grow by 18.6%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than CECO Environmental, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than CECO Environmental.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.089, which suggesting that the stock is 8.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CECO Environmental has a beta of 1.409, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.912%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CECO Environmental offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CECO Environmental pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.9M, which are smaller than CECO Environmental quarterly revenues of $135.5M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $7.5M is higher than CECO Environmental's net income of $2.1M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.13x while CECO Environmental's PE ratio is 89.42x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.09x versus 1.93x for CECO Environmental. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Donaldson has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 11%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 20.67% beat Donaldson's return on equity of 29.12%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.8%. On the other hand Donaldson has an analysts' consensus of $75.83 which suggests that it could grow by 11.49%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than Donaldson, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Donaldson.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.089, which suggesting that the stock is 8.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Donaldson has a beta of 1.042, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 4.206%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Donaldson offers a yield of 1.56% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson pays out 29.66% of its earnings as a dividend. Donaldson's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.9M, which are smaller than Donaldson quarterly revenues of $900.1M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $7.5M is lower than Donaldson's net income of $99M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.13x while Donaldson's PE ratio is 19.77x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.09x versus 2.29x for Donaldson. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Fuel Tech has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 1.02%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 20.67% beat Fuel Tech's return on equity of -1.37%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.8%. On the other hand Fuel Tech has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 284.62%. Given that Fuel Tech has higher upside potential than Limbach Holdings, analysts believe Fuel Tech is more attractive than Limbach Holdings.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.089, which suggesting that the stock is 8.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Fuel Tech has a beta of 4.099, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 309.928%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Fuel Tech offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Fuel Tech pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.9M, which are larger than Fuel Tech quarterly revenues of $7.9M. Limbach Holdings's net income of $7.5M is higher than Fuel Tech's net income of $80K. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.13x while Fuel Tech's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.09x versus 1.22x for Fuel Tech. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lennox International has a net margin of 5.59% compared to Limbach Holdings's net margin of 15.95%. Limbach Holdings's return on equity of 20.67% beat Lennox International's return on equity of 175.69%.

Limbach Holdings has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 18.8%. On the other hand Lennox International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -1.41%. Given that Limbach Holdings has higher upside potential than Lennox International, analysts believe Limbach Holdings is more attractive than Lennox International.

Limbach Holdings has a beta of 1.089, which suggesting that the stock is 8.932% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lennox International has a beta of 1.084, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.373%.

Limbach Holdings has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Lennox International offers a yield of 0.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.15 per share. Limbach Holdings pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International pays out 26% of its earnings as a dividend. Lennox International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Limbach Holdings quarterly revenues are $133.9M, which are smaller than Lennox International quarterly revenues of $1.5B. Limbach Holdings's net income of $7.5M is lower than Lennox International's net income of $239M. Notably, Limbach Holdings's price-to-earnings ratio is 41.13x while Lennox International's PE ratio is 29.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Limbach Holdings is 2.09x versus 4.37x for Lennox International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.