LSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 3.73%. Landstar System's return on equity of 19.63% beat Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's return on equity of 1.66%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $164.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.48%. On the other hand Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $61.68 which suggests that it could grow by 32.58%. Given that Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings has a beta of 0.971, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.887%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings offers a yield of 1.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings pays out 88.55% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Landstar System's net income of $46.2M is lower than Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's net income of $69.5M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.25x while Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings's PE ratio is 63.73x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.11x versus 1.02x for Knight-Swift Transportation Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Marten Transport has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 2.45%. Landstar System's return on equity of 19.63% beat Marten Transport's return on equity of 3.52%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $164.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.48%. On the other hand Marten Transport has an analysts' consensus of $17.00 which suggests that it could grow by 24.73%. Given that Marten Transport has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Marten Transport is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Marten Transport has a beta of 0.841, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 15.892%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Marten Transport offers a yield of 1.76% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.06 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Marten Transport pays out 72.58% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Marten Transport quarterly revenues of $230.4M. Landstar System's net income of $46.2M is higher than Marten Transport's net income of $5.6M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.25x while Marten Transport's PE ratio is 40.09x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.11x versus 1.15x for Marten Transport. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Old Dominion Freight Line has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 18.99%. Landstar System's return on equity of 19.63% beat Old Dominion Freight Line's return on equity of 27.98%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $164.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.48%. On the other hand Old Dominion Freight Line has an analysts' consensus of $198.22 which suggests that it could grow by 21.98%. Given that Old Dominion Freight Line has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Old Dominion Freight Line is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Old Dominion Freight Line has a beta of 1.103, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.275%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Old Dominion Freight Line offers a yield of 0.65% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Old Dominion Freight Line pays out 18.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are smaller than Old Dominion Freight Line quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Landstar System's net income of $46.2M is lower than Old Dominion Freight Line's net income of $263.1M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.25x while Old Dominion Freight Line's PE ratio is 29.65x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.11x versus 6.05x for Old Dominion Freight Line. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Saia has a net margin of 3.82% compared to Landstar System's net margin of 9.65%. Landstar System's return on equity of 19.63% beat Saia's return on equity of 17%.

Landstar System has a consensus price target of $164.67, signalling upside risk potential of 9.48%. On the other hand Saia has an analysts' consensus of $500.96 which suggests that it could grow by 41.66%. Given that Saia has higher upside potential than Landstar System, analysts believe Saia is more attractive than Landstar System.

Landstar System has a beta of 0.822, which suggesting that the stock is 17.803% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Saia has a beta of 1.895, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 89.468%.

Landstar System has a quarterly dividend of $0.36 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.94%. Saia offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Landstar System pays 61.48% of its earnings as a dividend. Saia pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Landstar System's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Landstar System quarterly revenues are $1.2B, which are larger than Saia quarterly revenues of $789M. Landstar System's net income of $46.2M is lower than Saia's net income of $76.1M. Notably, Landstar System's price-to-earnings ratio is 27.25x while Saia's PE ratio is 26.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Landstar System is 1.11x versus 2.95x for Saia. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.