Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
38
MFIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$13.44
Seasonality move
:
-0.99%
Day range:
$13.32 - $13.52
52-week range:
$12.26 - $16.37
Dividend yield:
11.32%
P/E ratio:
8.61x
P/S ratio:
7.23x
P/B ratio:
0.89x
Volume:
736.3K
Avg. volume:
404.5K
1-year change:
-1.1%
Market cap:
$1.3B
Revenue:
$133.2M
EPS (TTM):
$1.56
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$79.9M | $0.42 | 130.38% | -21.24% | -- |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management
|
$899.9M | $1.72 | -91.33% | -58.39% | $182.82 |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
|
$22.7M | $0.25 | 377.22% | 25.26% | -- |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
|
$234M | $0.44 | 175.24% | -4.44% | -- |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
$97.6M | $0.56 | 676.25% | 286.77% | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
$13.43 | -- | $1.3B | 8.61x | $0.38 | 11.32% | 7.23x |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management
|
$171.03 | $182.82 | $96.8B | 17.87x | $0.46 | 1.06% | 3.21x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
$150.15 | -- | $408.8M | 8.53x | $1.50 | 4% | 2.84x |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
|
$13.46 | -- | $493.8M | 12.82x | $0.08 | 7.13% | 13.52x |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
|
$15.07 | -- | $4B | 10.69x | $0.39 | 10.95% | 11.13x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
$15.18 | -- | $1.2B | 21.08x | $0.55 | 14.49% | 21.19x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
55.59% | 0.696 | 141.18% | 9.05x |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management
|
35.44% | 1.017 | 11.44% | 0.83x |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
-- | 0.513 | -- | 1.97x |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
|
42.66% | -0.127 | 64.33% | 0.17x |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
|
53.4% | 0.035 | 115.18% | 2.29x |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
52.41% | 0.262 | 122.16% | 2.73x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
MFIC
MidCap Financial Investment
|
-- | -- | 4.15% | 9.95% | 196.31% | -$10.1M |
|
APO
Apollo Global Management
|
$7.5B | $2.3B | 16.75% | 22.46% | 27.89% | $1.9B |
|
DHIL
Diamond Hill Investment Group
|
$16.4M | $10.2M | 29.74% | 29.74% | 23.42% | $18.3M |
|
GAIN
Gladstone Investment
|
-- | -- | 4.41% | 8.06% | 141.31% | $63.2M |
|
GBDC
Golub Capital BDC
|
-- | -- | 4.01% | 8.68% | 169.06% | -$200M |
|
OCSL
Oaktree Specialty Lending
|
-- | -- | 1.84% | 3.84% | 187.33% | $95.5M |
MidCap Financial Investment vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or APO?
Apollo Global Management has a net margin of 89.54% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 10.43%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95% beat Apollo Global Management's return on equity of 22.46%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.31 $3.2B APOApollo Global Management96.26% $1.29 $41.3B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or APO?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.99%. On the other hand Apollo Global Management has an analysts' consensus of $182.82 which suggests that it could grow by 6.9%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Apollo Global Management, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Apollo Global Management.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 4 0 APOApollo Global Management9 5 0 -
Is MFIC or APO More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Apollo Global Management has a beta of 1.628, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 62.765%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or APO?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Apollo Global Management offers a yield of 1.06% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.46 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management pays out 20.49% of its earnings as a dividend. Apollo Global Management's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or APO?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Apollo Global Management quarterly revenues of $7.8B. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M is lower than Apollo Global Management's net income of $811M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while Apollo Global Management's PE ratio is 17.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 7.23x versus 3.21x for Apollo Global Management. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment7.23x 8.61x $29.8M $26.7M APOApollo Global Management3.21x 17.87x $7.8B $811M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or DHIL?
Diamond Hill Investment Group has a net margin of 89.54% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 33.56%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95% beat Diamond Hill Investment Group's return on equity of 29.74%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.31 $3.2B DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group37.55% $5.35 $166.5M -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or DHIL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.99%. On the other hand Diamond Hill Investment Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Diamond Hill Investment Group, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Diamond Hill Investment Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 4 0 DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group0 0 0 -
Is MFIC or DHIL More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Diamond Hill Investment Group has a beta of 1.013, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.328%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or DHIL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Diamond Hill Investment Group offers a yield of 4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.50 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group pays out 41.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Diamond Hill Investment Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or DHIL?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Diamond Hill Investment Group quarterly revenues of $43.6M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M is higher than Diamond Hill Investment Group's net income of $14.6M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while Diamond Hill Investment Group's PE ratio is 8.53x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 7.23x versus 2.84x for Diamond Hill Investment Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment7.23x 8.61x $29.8M $26.7M DHILDiamond Hill Investment Group2.84x 8.53x $43.6M $14.6M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GAIN?
Gladstone Investment has a net margin of 89.54% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 99.99%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95% beat Gladstone Investment's return on equity of 8.06%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.31 $3.2B GAINGladstone Investment-- $0.42 $799.4M -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.99%. On the other hand Gladstone Investment has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 0.3%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Gladstone Investment, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Gladstone Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 4 0 GAINGladstone Investment0 0 0 -
Is MFIC or GAIN More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Gladstone Investment has a beta of 1.295, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 29.493%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Gladstone Investment offers a yield of 7.13% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment pays out 89.16% of its earnings as a dividend. Gladstone Investment's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but MidCap Financial Investment's is not.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GAIN?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are larger than Gladstone Investment quarterly revenues of $15.5M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M is higher than Gladstone Investment's net income of $15.5M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while Gladstone Investment's PE ratio is 12.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 7.23x versus 13.52x for Gladstone Investment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment7.23x 8.61x $29.8M $26.7M GAINGladstone Investment13.52x 12.82x $15.5M $15.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or GBDC?
Golub Capital BDC has a net margin of 89.54% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of 98.44%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95% beat Golub Capital BDC's return on equity of 8.68%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.31 $3.2B GBDCGolub Capital BDC-- $0.36 $8.6B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.99%. On the other hand Golub Capital BDC has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 7.83%. Given that MidCap Financial Investment has higher upside potential than Golub Capital BDC, analysts believe MidCap Financial Investment is more attractive than Golub Capital BDC.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 4 0 GBDCGolub Capital BDC0 0 0 -
Is MFIC or GBDC More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golub Capital BDC has a beta of 0.631, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.861%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Golub Capital BDC offers a yield of 10.95% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.39 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Golub Capital BDC pays out 123.53% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or GBDC?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Golub Capital BDC quarterly revenues of $94.2M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M is lower than Golub Capital BDC's net income of $95.2M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while Golub Capital BDC's PE ratio is 10.69x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 7.23x versus 11.13x for Golub Capital BDC. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment7.23x 8.61x $29.8M $26.7M GBDCGolub Capital BDC11.13x 10.69x $94.2M $95.2M
-
Which has Higher Returns MFIC or OCSL?
Oaktree Specialty Lending has a net margin of 89.54% compared to MidCap Financial Investment's net margin of -121.48%. MidCap Financial Investment's return on equity of 9.95% beat Oaktree Specialty Lending's return on equity of 3.84%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital MFICMidCap Financial Investment-- $0.31 $3.2B OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending-- $0.45 $3.1B -
What do Analysts Say About MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 10.99%. On the other hand Oaktree Specialty Lending has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 11.44%. Given that Oaktree Specialty Lending has higher upside potential than MidCap Financial Investment, analysts believe Oaktree Specialty Lending is more attractive than MidCap Financial Investment.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings MFICMidCap Financial Investment4 4 0 OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending0 0 0 -
Is MFIC or OCSL More Risky?
MidCap Financial Investment has a beta of 1.496, which suggesting that the stock is 49.614% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Oaktree Specialty Lending has a beta of 1.078, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.767%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment has a quarterly dividend of $0.38 per share corresponding to a yield of 11.32%. Oaktree Specialty Lending offers a yield of 14.49% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.55 per share. MidCap Financial Investment pays 103.97% of its earnings as a dividend. Oaktree Specialty Lending pays out 305.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Neither of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios MFIC or OCSL?
MidCap Financial Investment quarterly revenues are $29.8M, which are smaller than Oaktree Specialty Lending quarterly revenues of $36.5M. MidCap Financial Investment's net income of $26.7M is lower than Oaktree Specialty Lending's net income of $36.9M. Notably, MidCap Financial Investment's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.61x while Oaktree Specialty Lending's PE ratio is 21.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MidCap Financial Investment is 7.23x versus 21.19x for Oaktree Specialty Lending. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income MFICMidCap Financial Investment7.23x 8.61x $29.8M $26.7M OCSLOaktree Specialty Lending21.19x 21.08x $36.5M $36.9M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 21
Quantum [QMCO] is up 26.28% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 21
Nukkleus [NUKK] is down 22.94% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 21
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 22.7% over the past day.
