MRCY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

BWX Technologies has a net margin of -7.88% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 9.52%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -6.14% beat BWX Technologies's return on equity of 28.1%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.55%. On the other hand BWX Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $134.73 which suggests that it could grow by 23.64%. Given that BWX Technologies has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe BWX Technologies is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.757% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison BWX Technologies has a beta of 0.673, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.668%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. BWX Technologies offers a yield of 0.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. BWX Technologies pays out 31.34% of its earnings as a dividend. BWX Technologies's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $223.1M, which are smaller than BWX Technologies quarterly revenues of $746.3M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.6M is lower than BWX Technologies's net income of $71M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while BWX Technologies's PE ratio is 35.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.27x versus 3.70x for BWX Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CAM Group has a net margin of -7.88% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of --. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -6.14% beat CAM Group's return on equity of --.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.55%. On the other hand CAM Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Mercury Systems has higher upside potential than CAM Group, analysts believe Mercury Systems is more attractive than CAM Group.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.757% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CAM Group has a beta of -1.914, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 291.422%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CAM Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CAM Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $223.1M, which are larger than CAM Group quarterly revenues of --. Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.6M is higher than CAM Group's net income of --. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CAM Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.27x versus -- for CAM Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a net margin of -7.88% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 1.38%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -6.14% beat Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's return on equity of 1.28%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.55%. On the other hand Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has an analysts' consensus of $34.82 which suggests that it could grow by 3.66%. Given that Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Kratos Defense & Security Solutions is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.757% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Kratos Defense & Security Solutions has a beta of 1.009, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 0.87699999999999%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Kratos Defense & Security Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $223.1M, which are smaller than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions quarterly revenues of $283.1M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.6M is lower than Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's net income of $3.9M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Kratos Defense & Security Solutions's PE ratio is 305.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.27x versus 4.50x for Kratos Defense & Security Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Park Aerospace has a net margin of -7.88% compared to Mercury Systems's net margin of 10.95%. Mercury Systems's return on equity of -6.14% beat Park Aerospace's return on equity of 6.59%.

Mercury Systems has a consensus price target of $45.00, signalling downside risk potential of -9.55%. On the other hand Park Aerospace has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 96.52%. Given that Park Aerospace has higher upside potential than Mercury Systems, analysts believe Park Aerospace is more attractive than Mercury Systems.

Mercury Systems has a beta of 0.862, which suggesting that the stock is 13.757% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Park Aerospace has a beta of 0.362, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 63.821%.

Mercury Systems has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Park Aerospace offers a yield of 3.78% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Mercury Systems pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Park Aerospace pays out 409.8% of its earnings as a dividend.

Mercury Systems quarterly revenues are $223.1M, which are larger than Park Aerospace quarterly revenues of $14.4M. Mercury Systems's net income of -$17.6M is lower than Park Aerospace's net income of $1.6M. Notably, Mercury Systems's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Park Aerospace's PE ratio is 36.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Mercury Systems is 3.27x versus 4.37x for Park Aerospace. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.