MXL Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Broadcom has a net margin of -93.44% compared to MaxLinear's net margin of 30.77%. MaxLinear's return on equity of -35.28% beat Broadcom's return on equity of 9.91%.

MaxLinear has a consensus price target of $20.35, signalling downside risk potential of -0.59%. On the other hand Broadcom has an analysts' consensus of $238.21 which suggests that it could grow by 0.76%. Given that Broadcom has higher upside potential than MaxLinear, analysts believe Broadcom is more attractive than MaxLinear.

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.788, which suggesting that the stock is 78.807% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Broadcom has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.259%.

MaxLinear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Broadcom offers a yield of 0.92% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.59 per share. MaxLinear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Broadcom pays out 166.48% of its earnings as a dividend.

MaxLinear quarterly revenues are $81.1M, which are smaller than Broadcom quarterly revenues of $14.1B. MaxLinear's net income of -$75.8M is lower than Broadcom's net income of $4.3B. Notably, MaxLinear's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Broadcom's PE ratio is 192.83x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MaxLinear is 4.31x versus 21.73x for Broadcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

inTest has a net margin of -93.44% compared to MaxLinear's net margin of 1.64%. MaxLinear's return on equity of -35.28% beat inTest's return on equity of 2.9%.

MaxLinear has a consensus price target of $20.35, signalling downside risk potential of -0.59%. On the other hand inTest has an analysts' consensus of $11.50 which suggests that it could grow by 21.05%. Given that inTest has higher upside potential than MaxLinear, analysts believe inTest is more attractive than MaxLinear.

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.788, which suggesting that the stock is 78.807% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison inTest has a beta of 1.848, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 84.848%.

MaxLinear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. inTest offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MaxLinear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. inTest pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MaxLinear quarterly revenues are $81.1M, which are larger than inTest quarterly revenues of $30.3M. MaxLinear's net income of -$75.8M is lower than inTest's net income of $495K. Notably, MaxLinear's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while inTest's PE ratio is 43.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MaxLinear is 4.31x versus 0.95x for inTest. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

NVIDIA has a net margin of -93.44% compared to MaxLinear's net margin of 55.04%. MaxLinear's return on equity of -35.28% beat NVIDIA's return on equity of 126.43%.

MaxLinear has a consensus price target of $20.35, signalling downside risk potential of -0.59%. On the other hand NVIDIA has an analysts' consensus of $172.80 which suggests that it could grow by 15.64%. Given that NVIDIA has higher upside potential than MaxLinear, analysts believe NVIDIA is more attractive than MaxLinear.

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.788, which suggesting that the stock is 78.807% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison NVIDIA has a beta of 1.643, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 64.285%.

MaxLinear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. NVIDIA offers a yield of 0.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.01 per share. MaxLinear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA pays out 1.33% of its earnings as a dividend. NVIDIA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

MaxLinear quarterly revenues are $81.1M, which are smaller than NVIDIA quarterly revenues of $35.1B. MaxLinear's net income of -$75.8M is lower than NVIDIA's net income of $19.3B. Notably, MaxLinear's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while NVIDIA's PE ratio is 58.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MaxLinear is 4.31x versus 32.80x for NVIDIA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SiTime has a net margin of -93.44% compared to MaxLinear's net margin of -33.48%. MaxLinear's return on equity of -35.28% beat SiTime's return on equity of -13.53%.

MaxLinear has a consensus price target of $20.35, signalling downside risk potential of -0.59%. On the other hand SiTime has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -10.49%. Given that SiTime has more downside risk than MaxLinear, analysts believe MaxLinear is more attractive than SiTime.

MaxLinear has a beta of 1.788, which suggesting that the stock is 78.807% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SiTime has a beta of 1.817, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 81.722%.

MaxLinear has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SiTime offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. MaxLinear pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SiTime pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

MaxLinear quarterly revenues are $81.1M, which are larger than SiTime quarterly revenues of $57.7M. MaxLinear's net income of -$75.8M is lower than SiTime's net income of -$19.3M. Notably, MaxLinear's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SiTime's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for MaxLinear is 4.31x versus 30.58x for SiTime. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.