Is Rivian a Good Stock a Buy?
Rivian Automotive (RIVN) had an initial IPO of close to…
Buy
60
NFE Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$11.91
Seasonality move
:
1.4%
Day range:
$11.01 - $12.31
52-week range:
$7.58 - $30.80
Dividend yield:
3.27%
P/E ratio:
9.93x
P/S ratio:
1.13x
P/B ratio:
1.78x
Volume:
5.4M
Avg. volume:
5.8M
1-year change:
-59.35%
Market cap:
$3.3B
Revenue:
$2.4B
EPS (TTM):
-$1.26
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NFE
New Fortress Energy
|
$613.2M | $0.06 | -18.3% | -28.2% | $16.86 |
|
ATO
Atmos Energy
|
$1.3B | $2.20 | 13.77% | 0.84% | $152.32 |
|
BKH
Black Hills
|
$944M | $1.34 | 0.46% | 1.07% | $65.00 |
|
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
|
$90.9M | $0.41 | 30.99% | 268.18% | $5.19 |
|
RGCO
RGC Resources
|
$26M | $0.50 | 6.47% | -- | -- |
|
SRE
Sempra
|
$4.7B | $1.55 | 7.05% | 4.6% | $82.29 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NFE
New Fortress Energy
|
$12.22 | $16.86 | $3.3B | 9.93x | $0.10 | 3.27% | 1.13x |
|
ATO
Atmos Energy
|
$149.64 | $152.32 | $23.8B | 21.41x | $0.87 | 2.24% | 5.53x |
|
BKH
Black Hills
|
$59.46 | $65.00 | $4.3B | 15.17x | $0.68 | 4.42% | 1.95x |
|
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
|
$2.00 | $5.19 | $56.9M | 100.00x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
RGCO
RGC Resources
|
$20.90 | -- | $215.2M | 17.86x | $0.21 | 3.86% | 2.44x |
|
SRE
Sempra
|
$70.26 | $82.29 | $45.8B | 15.90x | $0.65 | 3.57% | 3.40x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NFE
New Fortress Energy
|
82.58% | 0.339 | 214.25% | 0.57x |
|
ATO
Atmos Energy
|
39.97% | 0.712 | 38.5% | 1.03x |
|
BKH
Black Hills
|
55.6% | 0.799 | 102.55% | 0.51x |
|
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
|
199.51% | 1.237 | 41.93% | 0.85x |
|
RGCO
RGC Resources
|
58.35% | 0.550 | 77.08% | 0.28x |
|
SRE
Sempra
|
53.43% | 1.406 | 56.75% | 0.42x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
NFE
New Fortress Energy
|
$348M | $247.4M | -2.63% | -13.91% | -16.21% | -$399.4M |
|
ATO
Atmos Energy
|
$734.9M | $459.5M | 5.45% | 9.03% | 41.17% | -$609.2M |
|
BKH
Black Hills
|
$248.8M | $163.3M | 3.45% | 7.9% | 27.5% | -$60.5M |
|
OPAL
OPAL Fuels
|
$27.6M | $8.8M | 1.59% | 2.4% | -0.1% | -$53.3M |
|
RGCO
RGC Resources
|
$10.9M | $7.3M | 4.68% | 11.07% | 31.72% | -$4.9M |
|
SRE
Sempra
|
$1.9B | $1B | 4.17% | 8.07% | 26.66% | -$1.1B |
New Fortress Energy vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns NFE or ATO?
Atmos Energy has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 29.92%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat Atmos Energy's return on equity of 9.03%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NFENew Fortress Energy51.25% -$1.11 $10.9B ATOAtmos Energy62.49% $2.23 $21.3B -
What do Analysts Say About NFE or ATO?
New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $16.86, signalling upside risk potential of 37.95%. On the other hand Atmos Energy has an analysts' consensus of $152.32 which suggests that it could grow by 1.79%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Atmos Energy, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Atmos Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NFENew Fortress Energy4 3 0 ATOAtmos Energy5 6 0 -
Is NFE or ATO More Risky?
New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Atmos Energy has a beta of 0.672, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.819%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NFE or ATO?
New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. Atmos Energy offers a yield of 2.24% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.87 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Atmos Energy pays out 47.27% of its earnings as a dividend. Atmos Energy's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NFE or ATO?
New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are smaller than Atmos Energy quarterly revenues of $1.2B. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than Atmos Energy's net income of $351.9M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Atmos Energy's PE ratio is 21.41x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 1.13x versus 5.53x for Atmos Energy. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NFENew Fortress Energy1.13x 9.93x $679M -$223.6M ATOAtmos Energy5.53x 21.41x $1.2B $351.9M
-
Which has Higher Returns NFE or BKH?
Black Hills has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 16.43%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat Black Hills's return on equity of 7.9%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NFENew Fortress Energy51.25% -$1.11 $10.9B BKHBlack Hills41.67% $1.37 $8B -
What do Analysts Say About NFE or BKH?
New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $16.86, signalling upside risk potential of 37.95%. On the other hand Black Hills has an analysts' consensus of $65.00 which suggests that it could grow by 9.32%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Black Hills, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Black Hills.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NFENew Fortress Energy4 3 0 BKHBlack Hills1 3 0 -
Is NFE or BKH More Risky?
New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Black Hills has a beta of 0.681, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 31.938%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NFE or BKH?
New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. Black Hills offers a yield of 4.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.68 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills pays out 66.75% of its earnings as a dividend. Black Hills's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NFE or BKH?
New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are larger than Black Hills quarterly revenues of $597.1M. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than Black Hills's net income of $98.1M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Black Hills's PE ratio is 15.17x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 1.13x versus 1.95x for Black Hills. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NFENew Fortress Energy1.13x 9.93x $679M -$223.6M BKHBlack Hills1.95x 15.17x $597.1M $98.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns NFE or OPAL?
OPAL Fuels has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 1.61%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat OPAL Fuels's return on equity of 2.4%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NFENew Fortress Energy51.25% -$1.11 $10.9B OPALOPAL Fuels34.53% -$0.05 $762.7M -
What do Analysts Say About NFE or OPAL?
New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $16.86, signalling upside risk potential of 37.95%. On the other hand OPAL Fuels has an analysts' consensus of $5.19 which suggests that it could grow by 159.38%. Given that OPAL Fuels has higher upside potential than New Fortress Energy, analysts believe OPAL Fuels is more attractive than New Fortress Energy.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NFENew Fortress Energy4 3 0 OPALOPAL Fuels5 1 0 -
Is NFE or OPAL More Risky?
New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison OPAL Fuels has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NFE or OPAL?
New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. OPAL Fuels offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. OPAL Fuels pays out 118.63% of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NFE or OPAL?
New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are larger than OPAL Fuels quarterly revenues of $80M. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than OPAL Fuels's net income of $1.3M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while OPAL Fuels's PE ratio is 100.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 1.13x versus 0.18x for OPAL Fuels. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NFENew Fortress Energy1.13x 9.93x $679M -$223.6M OPALOPAL Fuels0.18x 100.00x $80M $1.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NFE or RGCO?
RGC Resources has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 19.31%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat RGC Resources's return on equity of 11.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NFENew Fortress Energy51.25% -$1.11 $10.9B RGCORGC Resources39.92% $0.51 $268.3M -
What do Analysts Say About NFE or RGCO?
New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $16.86, signalling upside risk potential of 37.95%. On the other hand RGC Resources has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 29.19%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than RGC Resources, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than RGC Resources.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NFENew Fortress Energy4 3 0 RGCORGC Resources0 0 0 -
Is NFE or RGCO More Risky?
New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison RGC Resources has a beta of 0.245, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 75.455%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NFE or RGCO?
New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. RGC Resources offers a yield of 3.86% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources pays out 68.78% of its earnings as a dividend. RGC Resources's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NFE or RGCO?
New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are larger than RGC Resources quarterly revenues of $27.3M. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than RGC Resources's net income of $5.3M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while RGC Resources's PE ratio is 17.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 1.13x versus 2.44x for RGC Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NFENew Fortress Energy1.13x 9.93x $679M -$223.6M RGCORGC Resources2.44x 17.86x $27.3M $5.3M
-
Which has Higher Returns NFE or SRE?
Sempra has a net margin of -32.93% compared to New Fortress Energy's net margin of 17.99%. New Fortress Energy's return on equity of -13.91% beat Sempra's return on equity of 8.07%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital NFENew Fortress Energy51.25% -$1.11 $10.9B SRESempra49.23% $1.04 $73.6B -
What do Analysts Say About NFE or SRE?
New Fortress Energy has a consensus price target of $16.86, signalling upside risk potential of 37.95%. On the other hand Sempra has an analysts' consensus of $82.29 which suggests that it could grow by 17.12%. Given that New Fortress Energy has higher upside potential than Sempra, analysts believe New Fortress Energy is more attractive than Sempra.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings NFENew Fortress Energy4 3 0 SRESempra7 9 0 -
Is NFE or SRE More Risky?
New Fortress Energy has a beta of 1.586, which suggesting that the stock is 58.602% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sempra has a beta of 0.765, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 23.537%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock NFE or SRE?
New Fortress Energy has a quarterly dividend of $0.10 per share corresponding to a yield of 3.27%. Sempra offers a yield of 3.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share. New Fortress Energy pays -26.23% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra pays out 53.91% of its earnings as a dividend. Sempra's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios NFE or SRE?
New Fortress Energy quarterly revenues are $679M, which are smaller than Sempra quarterly revenues of $3.8B. New Fortress Energy's net income of -$223.6M is lower than Sempra's net income of $676M. Notably, New Fortress Energy's price-to-earnings ratio is 9.93x while Sempra's PE ratio is 15.90x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for New Fortress Energy is 1.13x versus 3.40x for Sempra. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income NFENew Fortress Energy1.13x 9.93x $679M -$223.6M SRESempra3.40x 15.90x $3.8B $676M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Chevron Acquire Hess?
Long-time Buffett favorite in the energy sector Chevron (NYSE:CVX) is…
Why Did Progressive Stock Go Down?
Shares of insurance giant Progressive (NYSE:PGR) have fallen considerably over…
Stock Ideas
Buy
56
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 36x
Buy
56
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3T
P/E Ratio: 41x
Buy
53
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x
Alerts
Sell
47
RGC alert for Mar 25
Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 4.9% over the past day.
Buy
54
AZEK alert for Mar 25
The AZEK [AZEK] is up 1.01% over the past day.
Sell
36
MPTI alert for Mar 25
M-Tron Industries [MPTI] is up 7.48% over the past day.
