NNDM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Markforged Holding has a net margin of -56.18% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -114.09%. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -9.37% beat Markforged Holding's return on equity of -65.07%.

Nano Dimension has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 296.83%. On the other hand Markforged Holding has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 60.26%. Given that Nano Dimension has higher upside potential than Markforged Holding, analysts believe Nano Dimension is more attractive than Markforged Holding.

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Markforged Holding has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Dimension has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Markforged Holding offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Dimension pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Markforged Holding pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Dimension quarterly revenues are $14.9M, which are smaller than Markforged Holding quarterly revenues of $20.5M. Nano Dimension's net income of -$8.3M is higher than Markforged Holding's net income of -$23.4M. Notably, Nano Dimension's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Markforged Holding's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension is 9.24x versus 0.72x for Markforged Holding. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SatixFy Communications has a net margin of -56.18% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -539.62%. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -9.37% beat SatixFy Communications's return on equity of --.

Nano Dimension has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 296.83%. On the other hand SatixFy Communications has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 97.37%. Given that Nano Dimension has higher upside potential than SatixFy Communications, analysts believe Nano Dimension is more attractive than SatixFy Communications.

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SatixFy Communications has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Dimension has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SatixFy Communications offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Dimension pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SatixFy Communications pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Dimension quarterly revenues are $14.9M, which are larger than SatixFy Communications quarterly revenues of $2.5M. Nano Dimension's net income of -$8.3M is higher than SatixFy Communications's net income of -$13.3M. Notably, Nano Dimension's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while SatixFy Communications's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension is 9.24x versus 9.20x for SatixFy Communications. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Silynxcom has a net margin of -56.18% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of --. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -9.37% beat Silynxcom's return on equity of --.

Nano Dimension has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 296.83%. On the other hand Silynxcom has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 145.29%. Given that Nano Dimension has higher upside potential than Silynxcom, analysts believe Nano Dimension is more attractive than Silynxcom.

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Silynxcom has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nano Dimension has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Silynxcom offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Dimension pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Silynxcom pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Dimension quarterly revenues are $14.9M, which are larger than Silynxcom quarterly revenues of --. Nano Dimension's net income of -$8.3M is higher than Silynxcom's net income of --. Notably, Nano Dimension's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Silynxcom's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension is 9.24x versus -- for Silynxcom. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Wix.com has a net margin of -56.18% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of 6.02%. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -9.37% beat Wix.com's return on equity of --.

Nano Dimension has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 296.83%. On the other hand Wix.com has an analysts' consensus of $230.24 which suggests that it could grow by 1.78%. Given that Nano Dimension has higher upside potential than Wix.com, analysts believe Nano Dimension is more attractive than Wix.com.

Nano Dimension has a beta of 1.676, which suggesting that the stock is 67.576% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Wix.com has a beta of 1.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.28%.

Nano Dimension has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Wix.com offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nano Dimension pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Wix.com pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nano Dimension quarterly revenues are $14.9M, which are smaller than Wix.com quarterly revenues of $444.7M. Nano Dimension's net income of -$8.3M is lower than Wix.com's net income of $26.8M. Notably, Nano Dimension's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Wix.com's PE ratio is 141.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nano Dimension is 9.24x versus 7.80x for Wix.com. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.