Financhill
Sell
34

NTIC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Last price:
$11.02
Seasonality move :
0.89%
Day range:
$11.10 - $11.48
52-week range:
$10.96 - $19.63
Dividend yield:
2.52%
P/E ratio:
21.35x
P/S ratio:
1.27x
P/B ratio:
1.50x
Volume:
11.2K
Avg. volume:
15K
1-year change:
-20.54%
Market cap:
$105.1M
Revenue:
$85.1M
EPS (TTM):
$0.52

Price Performance History

Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Competitors

Company Revenue Forecast Earnings Forecast Revenue Growth Forecast Earnings Growth Forecast Analyst Price Target Median
NTIC
Northern Technologies International
$20.2M $0.06 -3.08% -64.71% $20.00
FRD
Friedman Industries
-- -- -- -- --
GPRE
Green Plains
$630M -$0.46 -2.3% -24.09% $11.11
ORGN
Origin Materials
$9.1M -$0.11 -30.51% -57.14% $2.50
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-- -$0.03 -- -- --
XPL
Solitario Resources
-- -$0.02 -- -- $1.50
Company Price Analyst Target Market Cap P/E Ratio Dividend per Share Dividend Yield Price / LTM Sales
NTIC
Northern Technologies International
$11.10 $20.00 $105.1M 21.35x $0.07 2.52% 1.27x
FRD
Friedman Industries
$16.30 -- $113.6M 20.12x $0.04 0.98% 0.25x
GPRE
Green Plains
$5.60 $11.11 $362.5M -- $0.00 0% 0.15x
ORGN
Origin Materials
$0.81 $2.50 $120.7M -- $0.00 0% 3.70x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
$0.37 -- $24.7M -- $0.00 0% --
XPL
Solitario Resources
$0.64 $1.50 $52.1M -- $0.00 0% --
Company Total Debt / Total Capital Beta Debt to Equity Quick Ratio
NTIC
Northern Technologies International
9.4% -1.318 5.36% 1.30x
FRD
Friedman Industries
20.34% -0.384 30.78% 0.78x
GPRE
Green Plains
39.94% 0.774 92.4% 0.69x
ORGN
Origin Materials
1.6% -2.383 2.89% 9.93x
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-- 1.921 -- --
XPL
Solitario Resources
-- -1.152 -- --
Company Gross Profit Operating Income Return on Invested Capital Return on Common Equity EBIT Margin Free Cash Flow
NTIC
Northern Technologies International
$8.2M -$1.3M 6.44% 6.95% 5.31% $1.1M
FRD
Friedman Industries
$8.1M -$1.6M 3.41% 4.48% -0.98% $1.6M
GPRE
Green Plains
$6.2M -$40.9M -5.49% -9% -6.62% -$54.2M
ORGN
Origin Materials
$12K -$16.1M -21.44% -21.81% -143.11% -$9.5M
PZG
Paramount Gold Nevada
-$186.4K -$1.2M -- -- -- -$946.4K
XPL
Solitario Resources
-$6K -$1.6M -- -- -- -$1.7M

Northern Technologies International vs. Competitors

  • Which has Higher Returns NTIC or FRD?

    Friedman Industries has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of -1.23%. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 6.95% beat Friedman Industries's return on equity of 4.48%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    38.26% $0.06 $81.6M
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    8.6% -$0.17 $159.8M
  • What do Analysts Say About NTIC or FRD?

    Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.18%. On the other hand Friedman Industries has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Northern Technologies International has higher upside potential than Friedman Industries, analysts believe Northern Technologies International is more attractive than Friedman Industries.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1 0 0
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    0 0 0
  • Is NTIC or FRD More Risky?

    Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.212% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Friedman Industries has a beta of 1.417, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 41.675%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTIC or FRD?

    Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Friedman Industries offers a yield of 0.98% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.04 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Friedman Industries pays out 3.35% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NTIC or FRD?

    Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $21.3M, which are smaller than Friedman Industries quarterly revenues of $94.1M. Northern Technologies International's net income of $561.1K is higher than Friedman Industries's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.35x while Friedman Industries's PE ratio is 20.12x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 1.27x versus 0.25x for Friedman Industries. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1.27x 21.35x $21.3M $561.1K
    FRD
    Friedman Industries
    0.25x 20.12x $94.1M -$1.2M
  • Which has Higher Returns NTIC or GPRE?

    Green Plains has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of -9.41%. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 6.95% beat Green Plains's return on equity of -9%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    38.26% $0.06 $81.6M
    GPRE
    Green Plains
    1.05% -$0.86 $1.4B
  • What do Analysts Say About NTIC or GPRE?

    Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.18%. On the other hand Green Plains has an analysts' consensus of $11.11 which suggests that it could grow by 98.41%. Given that Green Plains has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Green Plains is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1 0 0
    GPRE
    Green Plains
    3 6 0
  • Is NTIC or GPRE More Risky?

    Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.212% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Green Plains has a beta of 1.552, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.169%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTIC or GPRE?

    Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Green Plains offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Green Plains pays out -6.26% of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NTIC or GPRE?

    Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $21.3M, which are smaller than Green Plains quarterly revenues of $584M. Northern Technologies International's net income of $561.1K is higher than Green Plains's net income of -$54.9M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.35x while Green Plains's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 1.27x versus 0.15x for Green Plains. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1.27x 21.35x $21.3M $561.1K
    GPRE
    Green Plains
    0.15x -- $584M -$54.9M
  • Which has Higher Returns NTIC or ORGN?

    Origin Materials has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of -146.63%. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 6.95% beat Origin Materials's return on equity of -21.81%.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    38.26% $0.06 $81.6M
    ORGN
    Origin Materials
    0.13% -$0.09 $343.9M
  • What do Analysts Say About NTIC or ORGN?

    Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.18%. On the other hand Origin Materials has an analysts' consensus of $2.50 which suggests that it could grow by 85.62%. Given that Origin Materials has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Origin Materials is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1 0 0
    ORGN
    Origin Materials
    1 0 0
  • Is NTIC or ORGN More Risky?

    Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.212% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Origin Materials has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTIC or ORGN?

    Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Origin Materials offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Origin Materials pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NTIC or ORGN?

    Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $21.3M, which are larger than Origin Materials quarterly revenues of $9.2M. Northern Technologies International's net income of $561.1K is higher than Origin Materials's net income of -$13.5M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.35x while Origin Materials's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 1.27x versus 3.70x for Origin Materials. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1.27x 21.35x $21.3M $561.1K
    ORGN
    Origin Materials
    3.70x -- $9.2M -$13.5M
  • Which has Higher Returns NTIC or PZG?

    Paramount Gold Nevada has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of --. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 6.95% beat Paramount Gold Nevada's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    38.26% $0.06 $81.6M
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    -- -$0.03 --
  • What do Analysts Say About NTIC or PZG?

    Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.18%. On the other hand Paramount Gold Nevada has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 228.5%. Given that Paramount Gold Nevada has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Paramount Gold Nevada is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1 0 0
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    0 0 0
  • Is NTIC or PZG More Risky?

    Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.212% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Paramount Gold Nevada has a beta of 1.923, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 92.323%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTIC or PZG?

    Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Paramount Gold Nevada offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Paramount Gold Nevada pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NTIC or PZG?

    Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $21.3M, which are larger than Paramount Gold Nevada quarterly revenues of --. Northern Technologies International's net income of $561.1K is higher than Paramount Gold Nevada's net income of -$2M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.35x while Paramount Gold Nevada's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 1.27x versus -- for Paramount Gold Nevada. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1.27x 21.35x $21.3M $561.1K
    PZG
    Paramount Gold Nevada
    -- -- -- -$2M
  • Which has Higher Returns NTIC or XPL?

    Solitario Resources has a net margin of 2.63% compared to Northern Technologies International's net margin of --. Northern Technologies International's return on equity of 6.95% beat Solitario Resources's return on equity of --.

    Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    38.26% $0.06 $81.6M
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    -- -$0.02 --
  • What do Analysts Say About NTIC or XPL?

    Northern Technologies International has a consensus price target of $20.00, signalling upside risk potential of 80.18%. On the other hand Solitario Resources has an analysts' consensus of $1.50 which suggests that it could grow by 134.34%. Given that Solitario Resources has higher upside potential than Northern Technologies International, analysts believe Solitario Resources is more attractive than Northern Technologies International.

    Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1 0 0
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    0 0 0
  • Is NTIC or XPL More Risky?

    Northern Technologies International has a beta of 0.518, which suggesting that the stock is 48.212% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Solitario Resources has a beta of 0.921, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.928%.

  • Which is a Better Dividend Stock NTIC or XPL?

    Northern Technologies International has a quarterly dividend of $0.07 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.52%. Solitario Resources offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Northern Technologies International pays 48.85% of its earnings as a dividend. Solitario Resources pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Northern Technologies International's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

  • Which has Better Financial Ratios NTIC or XPL?

    Northern Technologies International quarterly revenues are $21.3M, which are larger than Solitario Resources quarterly revenues of --. Northern Technologies International's net income of $561.1K is higher than Solitario Resources's net income of -$1.6M. Notably, Northern Technologies International's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.35x while Solitario Resources's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Northern Technologies International is 1.27x versus -- for Solitario Resources. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

    Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income
    NTIC
    Northern Technologies International
    1.27x 21.35x $21.3M $561.1K
    XPL
    Solitario Resources
    -- -- -- -$1.6M

SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS

GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS

Popular

Is the Market Going to Go Lower?
Is the Market Going to Go Lower?

The last month has been extremely difficult for the stock…

2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession
2 Dividend Stocks to Buy in a Recession

While many economists and investors initially expected 2025 to be…

Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?
Is Ford Stock Undervalued Amid the EV Transition?

There is a lot going on in the electric vehicle…

Stock Ideas

Buy
53
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 35x

Buy
54
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 41x

Buy
51
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?

Market Cap: $2.9T
P/E Ratio: 33x

Alerts

Buy
52
RGC alert for Mar 18

Regencell Bioscience Holdings [RGC] is up 73.51% over the past day.

Buy
63
EXOD alert for Mar 18

Exodus Movement [EXOD] is down 3.96% over the past day.

Sell
45
MNPR alert for Mar 18

Monopar Therapeutics [MNPR] is up 0.93% over the past day.

THE #1 STOCK ANALYSIS TOOL
TO MAKE SMARTER BUY AND SELL DECISIONS

Show me the best stock