NYXH Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Galapagos NV has a net margin of -1347.39% compared to Nyxoah SA's net margin of -84.26%. Nyxoah SA's return on equity of -51.1% beat Galapagos NV's return on equity of 7.25%.

Nyxoah SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 96.15%. On the other hand Galapagos NV has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 15.45%. Given that Nyxoah SA has higher upside potential than Galapagos NV, analysts believe Nyxoah SA is more attractive than Galapagos NV.

Nyxoah SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Galapagos NV has a beta of 0.229, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 77.056%.

Nyxoah SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Galapagos NV offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nyxoah SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Galapagos NV pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nyxoah SA quarterly revenues are $1.4M, which are smaller than Galapagos NV quarterly revenues of $65.8M. Nyxoah SA's net income of -$18.8M is higher than Galapagos NV's net income of -$55.5M. Notably, Nyxoah SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Galapagos NV's PE ratio is 8.08x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nyxoah SA is 44.41x versus 6.35x for Galapagos NV. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

MDxHealth SA has a net margin of -1347.39% compared to Nyxoah SA's net margin of -47.99%. Nyxoah SA's return on equity of -51.1% beat MDxHealth SA's return on equity of -650.14%.

Nyxoah SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 96.15%. On the other hand MDxHealth SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 183.57%. Given that MDxHealth SA has higher upside potential than Nyxoah SA, analysts believe MDxHealth SA is more attractive than Nyxoah SA.

Nyxoah SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison MDxHealth SA has a beta of -390,599.621, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 39060062.135%.

Nyxoah SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. MDxHealth SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nyxoah SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. MDxHealth SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nyxoah SA quarterly revenues are $1.4M, which are smaller than MDxHealth SA quarterly revenues of $23.3M. Nyxoah SA's net income of -$18.8M is lower than MDxHealth SA's net income of -$11.2M. Notably, Nyxoah SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while MDxHealth SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nyxoah SA is 44.41x versus 0.81x for MDxHealth SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA has a net margin of -1347.39% compared to Nyxoah SA's net margin of --. Nyxoah SA's return on equity of -51.1% beat Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA's return on equity of --.

Nyxoah SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 96.15%. On the other hand Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nyxoah SA has higher upside potential than Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA, analysts believe Nyxoah SA is more attractive than Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA.

Nyxoah SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Nyxoah SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Nyxoah SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Nyxoah SA quarterly revenues are $1.4M, which are larger than Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA quarterly revenues of --. Nyxoah SA's net income of -$18.8M is higher than Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA's net income of --. Notably, Nyxoah SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nyxoah SA is 44.41x versus -- for Mithra Pharmaceuticals SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

UCB SA has a net margin of -1347.39% compared to Nyxoah SA's net margin of --. Nyxoah SA's return on equity of -51.1% beat UCB SA's return on equity of 2.64%.

Nyxoah SA has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 96.15%. On the other hand UCB SA has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Nyxoah SA has higher upside potential than UCB SA, analysts believe Nyxoah SA is more attractive than UCB SA.

Nyxoah SA has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison UCB SA has a beta of 0.733, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.695%.

Nyxoah SA has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. UCB SA offers a yield of 0.73% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.72 per share. Nyxoah SA pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. UCB SA pays out 73.47% of its earnings as a dividend. UCB SA's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Nyxoah SA quarterly revenues are $1.4M, which are larger than UCB SA quarterly revenues of --. Nyxoah SA's net income of -$18.8M is higher than UCB SA's net income of --. Notably, Nyxoah SA's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while UCB SA's PE ratio is 150.75x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Nyxoah SA is 44.41x versus 6.59x for UCB SA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.