Why Is SoundHound AI Stock Up So Much?
Like many companies improving AI technologies and exploring ways to…
Buy
65
ONEQ Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$78.82
Seasonality move
:
1.91%
Day range:
$77.91 - $78.84
52-week range:
$57.05 - $79.75
Dividend yield:
0.63%
P/E ratio:
--
P/S ratio:
--
P/B ratio:
--
Volume:
456.6K
Avg. volume:
272.1K
1-year change:
33.31%
Market cap:
--
Revenue:
--
EPS (TTM):
--
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IUSG
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
$78.84 | -- | -- | -- | $0.17 | 0.63% | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
$142.27 | -- | -- | -- | $0.28 | 0.32% | -- |
|
IUSG
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
|
$144.19 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 0.57% | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
$105.20 | -- | -- | -- | $0.13 | 0.42% | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
$416.74 | -- | -- | -- | $0.43 | 0.44% | -- |
|
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
|
$244.03 | -- | -- | -- | $0.25 | 0.41% | -- |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | 1.159 | -- | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | 1.264 | -- | -- |
|
IUSG
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.150 | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | 1.123 | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | 1.143 | -- | -- |
|
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
|
-- | 1.120 | -- | -- |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
FTC
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IUSG
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IVW
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWF
iShares Russell 1000 Growth
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
IWY
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or FTC?
First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or FTC?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or FTC More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund has a beta of 1.076, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.587%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or FTC?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund offers a yield of 0.32% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.28 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or FTC?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for First Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- FTCFirst Trust Large Cap Growth AlphaDEX Fund-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IUSG?
iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- IUSGiShares Core S&P US Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IUSG?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 IUSGiShares Core S&P US Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or IUSG More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF has a beta of 1.070, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.047%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IUSG?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.57% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IUSG?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Core S&P US Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- IUSGiShares Core S&P US Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IVW?
iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IVW?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or IVW More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF has a beta of 1.066, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.582%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IVW?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF offers a yield of 0.42% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IVW?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares S&P 500 Growth ETF. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- IVWiShares S&P 500 Growth ETF-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IWF?
iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell 1000 Growth's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IWF?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell 1000 Growth has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell 1000 Growth, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell 1000 Growth.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or IWF More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell 1000 Growth has a beta of 1.089, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.878%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IWF?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. iShares Russell 1000 Growth offers a yield of 0.44% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell 1000 Growth pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IWF?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell 1000 Growth quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell 1000 Growth's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell 1000 Growth's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell 1000 Growth. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- IWFiShares Russell 1000 Growth-- -- -- --
-
Which has Higher Returns ONEQ or IWY?
iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund has a net margin of -- compared to Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net margin of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's return on equity of -- beat iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- IWYiShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund-- -- -- -
What do Analysts Say About ONEQ or IWY?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of --. On the other hand iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has higher upside potential than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund, analysts believe Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is more attractive than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF0 0 0 IWYiShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund0 0 0 -
Is ONEQ or IWY More Risky?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a beta of 1.111, which suggesting that the stock is 11.092% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.045%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock ONEQ or IWY?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF has a quarterly dividend of $0.17 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.63%. iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund offers a yield of 0.41% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios ONEQ or IWY?
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF quarterly revenues are --, which are smaller than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund quarterly revenues of --. Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's net income of -- is lower than iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund's net income of --. Notably, Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF is -- versus -- for iShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income ONEQFidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF-- -- -- -- IWYiShares Russell Top 200 Growth Index Fund-- -- -- --
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Is The Santa Claus Rally The Gift That Keeps Giving?
Remember the horror of 2008 when the Great Recession hit…
Is Alphabet an Undervalued Growth Stock to Buy?
Alphabet (NASDAQ:GOOGL) is easily one of the most successful companies…
Stock Ideas
Buy
65
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.9T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
57
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.4T
P/E Ratio: 118x
Buy
58
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
87
PSIX alert for Dec 25
Power Solutions International [PSIX] is up 27.42% over the past day.
Buy
65
TSLL alert for Dec 25
Direxion Daily TSLA Bull 2X Shares [TSLL] is up 19.46% over the past day.
Buy
75
SMLR alert for Dec 25
Semler Scientific [SMLR] is up 15.37% over the past day.
