PCYO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Cadiz has a net margin of 37.15% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of -210.7%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 5.06% beat Cadiz's return on equity of -84.84%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -49.3%. On the other hand Cadiz has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 259.71%. Given that Cadiz has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Cadiz is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.30600000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cadiz has a beta of 0.972, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 2.847%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cadiz offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cadiz pays out -16.24% of its earnings as a dividend.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $7.6M, which are larger than Cadiz quarterly revenues of $3.2M. Pure Cycle's net income of $2.8M is higher than Cadiz's net income of -$6.8M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while Cadiz's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 10.85x versus 50.70x for Cadiz. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Middlesex Water has a net margin of 37.15% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 25.99%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 5.06% beat Middlesex Water's return on equity of 9.58%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -49.3%. On the other hand Middlesex Water has an analysts' consensus of $63.00 which suggests that it could grow by 14.52%. Given that Middlesex Water has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe Middlesex Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.30600000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Middlesex Water has a beta of 0.815, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 18.466%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Middlesex Water offers a yield of 2.4% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.34 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water pays out 71.57% of its earnings as a dividend. Middlesex Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $7.6M, which are smaller than Middlesex Water quarterly revenues of $55.1M. Pure Cycle's net income of $2.8M is lower than Middlesex Water's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while Middlesex Water's PE ratio is 23.79x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 10.85x versus 5.35x for Middlesex Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

SJW Group has a net margin of 37.15% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 17.17%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 5.06% beat SJW Group's return on equity of 7.14%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -49.3%. On the other hand SJW Group has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 28.21%. Given that SJW Group has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe SJW Group is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.30600000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison SJW Group has a beta of 0.625, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 37.491%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. SJW Group offers a yield of 3.19% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.40 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. SJW Group pays out 56.37% of its earnings as a dividend. SJW Group's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $7.6M, which are smaller than SJW Group quarterly revenues of $225.1M. Pure Cycle's net income of $2.8M is lower than SJW Group's net income of $38.7M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while SJW Group's PE ratio is 18.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 10.85x versus 2.25x for SJW Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

The York Water has a net margin of 37.15% compared to Pure Cycle's net margin of 29.74%. Pure Cycle's return on equity of 5.06% beat The York Water's return on equity of 9.5%.

Pure Cycle has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -49.3%. On the other hand The York Water has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 37.56%. Given that The York Water has higher upside potential than Pure Cycle, analysts believe The York Water is more attractive than Pure Cycle.

Pure Cycle has a beta of 1.003, which suggesting that the stock is 0.30600000000001% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The York Water has a beta of 0.634, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 36.587%.

Pure Cycle has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The York Water offers a yield of 2.52% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.21 per share. Pure Cycle pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water pays out 48.79% of its earnings as a dividend. The York Water's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pure Cycle quarterly revenues are $7.6M, which are smaller than The York Water quarterly revenues of $19.7M. Pure Cycle's net income of $2.8M is lower than The York Water's net income of $5.9M. Notably, Pure Cycle's price-to-earnings ratio is 26.65x while The York Water's PE ratio is 22.59x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pure Cycle is 10.85x versus 6.46x for The York Water. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.