PLBC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Busey has a net margin of 33.12% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 24.24%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 16.9% beat First Busey's return on equity of 8.52%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.86%. On the other hand First Busey has an analysts' consensus of $27.00 which suggests that it could grow by 35.75%. Given that First Busey has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe First Busey is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.46% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Busey has a beta of 0.748, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.209%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. First Busey offers a yield of 4.93% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. First Busey pays out 47.65% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21.7M, which are smaller than First Busey quarterly revenues of $116M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.2M is lower than First Busey's net income of $28.1M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.23x while First Busey's PE ratio is 10.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 2.89x versus 2.48x for First Busey. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cornerstone Community Bancorp has a net margin of 33.12% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 32.63%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 16.9% beat Cornerstone Community Bancorp's return on equity of -1.81%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.86%. On the other hand Cornerstone Community Bancorp has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Plumas Bancorp has higher upside potential than Cornerstone Community Bancorp, analysts believe Plumas Bancorp is more attractive than Cornerstone Community Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.46% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cornerstone Community Bancorp has a beta of 0.453, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 54.7%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Cornerstone Community Bancorp offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Cornerstone Community Bancorp pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plumas Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21.7M, which are larger than Cornerstone Community Bancorp quarterly revenues of $5.5M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.2M is higher than Cornerstone Community Bancorp's net income of $1.8M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.23x while Cornerstone Community Bancorp's PE ratio is 5.87x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 2.89x versus 2.54x for Cornerstone Community Bancorp. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

LendingClub has a net margin of 33.12% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 4.48%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 16.9% beat LendingClub's return on equity of 3.95%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.86%. On the other hand LendingClub has an analysts' consensus of $17.15 which suggests that it could grow by 85.41%. Given that LendingClub has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe LendingClub is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.46% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison LendingClub has a beta of 2.086, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 108.644%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. LendingClub offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. LendingClub pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plumas Bancorp's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21.7M, which are smaller than LendingClub quarterly revenues of $217.2M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.2M is lower than LendingClub's net income of $9.7M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.23x while LendingClub's PE ratio is 20.56x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 2.89x versus 1.33x for LendingClub. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Lakeland Financial has a net margin of 33.12% compared to Plumas Bancorp's net margin of 38.05%. Plumas Bancorp's return on equity of 16.9% beat Lakeland Financial's return on equity of 14.02%.

Plumas Bancorp has a consensus price target of $52.00, signalling upside risk potential of 27.86%. On the other hand Lakeland Financial has an analysts' consensus of $68.20 which suggests that it could grow by 30.85%. Given that Lakeland Financial has higher upside potential than Plumas Bancorp, analysts believe Lakeland Financial is more attractive than Plumas Bancorp.

Plumas Bancorp has a beta of 0.555, which suggesting that the stock is 44.46% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Lakeland Financial has a beta of 0.643, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 35.713%.

Plumas Bancorp has a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.73%. Lakeland Financial offers a yield of 3.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Plumas Bancorp pays 22.24% of its earnings as a dividend. Lakeland Financial pays out 52.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Plumas Bancorp quarterly revenues are $21.7M, which are smaller than Lakeland Financial quarterly revenues of $63.6M. Plumas Bancorp's net income of $7.2M is lower than Lakeland Financial's net income of $24.2M. Notably, Plumas Bancorp's price-to-earnings ratio is 8.23x while Lakeland Financial's PE ratio is 14.36x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Plumas Bancorp is 2.89x versus 5.30x for Lakeland Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.