PNFP Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

First Savings Financial Group has a net margin of 35.97% compared to Pinnacle Financial Partners's net margin of 20.36%. Pinnacle Financial Partners's return on equity of 6.87% beat First Savings Financial Group's return on equity of 8.23%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a consensus price target of $131.20, signalling upside risk potential of 13.67%. On the other hand First Savings Financial Group has an analysts' consensus of $31.67 which suggests that it could grow by 24.92%. Given that First Savings Financial Group has higher upside potential than Pinnacle Financial Partners, analysts believe First Savings Financial Group is more attractive than Pinnacle Financial Partners.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison First Savings Financial Group has a beta of 0.753, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 24.712%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. First Savings Financial Group offers a yield of 2.37% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.15 per share. Pinnacle Financial Partners pays 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. First Savings Financial Group pays out 29.8% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pinnacle Financial Partners quarterly revenues are $407.9M, which are larger than First Savings Financial Group quarterly revenues of $18M. Pinnacle Financial Partners's net income of $146.7M is higher than First Savings Financial Group's net income of $3.7M. Notably, Pinnacle Financial Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.94x while First Savings Financial Group's PE ratio is 12.80x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pinnacle Financial Partners is 6.22x versus 2.46x for First Savings Financial Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Huntington Bancshares has a net margin of 35.97% compared to Pinnacle Financial Partners's net margin of 27.59%. Pinnacle Financial Partners's return on equity of 6.87% beat Huntington Bancshares's return on equity of 8.48%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a consensus price target of $131.20, signalling upside risk potential of 13.67%. On the other hand Huntington Bancshares has an analysts' consensus of $18.46 which suggests that it could grow by 12.69%. Given that Pinnacle Financial Partners has higher upside potential than Huntington Bancshares, analysts believe Pinnacle Financial Partners is more attractive than Huntington Bancshares.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Huntington Bancshares has a beta of 1.073, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.262%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Huntington Bancshares offers a yield of 3.77% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.16 per share. Pinnacle Financial Partners pays 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Huntington Bancshares pays out 53% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pinnacle Financial Partners quarterly revenues are $407.9M, which are smaller than Huntington Bancshares quarterly revenues of $1.9B. Pinnacle Financial Partners's net income of $146.7M is lower than Huntington Bancshares's net income of $517M. Notably, Pinnacle Financial Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.94x while Huntington Bancshares's PE ratio is 15.82x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pinnacle Financial Partners is 6.22x versus 3.36x for Huntington Bancshares. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Truist Financial has a net margin of 35.97% compared to Pinnacle Financial Partners's net margin of 28.36%. Pinnacle Financial Partners's return on equity of 6.87% beat Truist Financial's return on equity of -2.5%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a consensus price target of $131.20, signalling upside risk potential of 13.67%. On the other hand Truist Financial has an analysts' consensus of $49.91 which suggests that it could grow by 13.18%. Given that Pinnacle Financial Partners has higher upside potential than Truist Financial, analysts believe Pinnacle Financial Partners is more attractive than Truist Financial.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Truist Financial has a beta of 1.080, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 7.98%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Truist Financial offers a yield of 4.72% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.52 per share. Pinnacle Financial Partners pays 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Truist Financial pays out -286.98% of its earnings as a dividend. Pinnacle Financial Partners's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pinnacle Financial Partners quarterly revenues are $407.9M, which are smaller than Truist Financial quarterly revenues of $5.1B. Pinnacle Financial Partners's net income of $146.7M is lower than Truist Financial's net income of $1.4B. Notably, Pinnacle Financial Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.94x while Truist Financial's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pinnacle Financial Partners is 6.22x versus 3.59x for Truist Financial. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Zions Bancorp NA has a net margin of 35.97% compared to Pinnacle Financial Partners's net margin of 27.02%. Pinnacle Financial Partners's return on equity of 6.87% beat Zions Bancorp NA's return on equity of 11.87%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a consensus price target of $131.20, signalling upside risk potential of 13.67%. On the other hand Zions Bancorp NA has an analysts' consensus of $60.10 which suggests that it could grow by 8.95%. Given that Pinnacle Financial Partners has higher upside potential than Zions Bancorp NA, analysts believe Pinnacle Financial Partners is more attractive than Zions Bancorp NA.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a beta of 1.095, which suggesting that the stock is 9.5% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zions Bancorp NA has a beta of 1.118, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 11.834%.

Pinnacle Financial Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.22 per share corresponding to a yield of 0.76%. Zions Bancorp NA offers a yield of 3.02% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. Pinnacle Financial Partners pays 14.93% of its earnings as a dividend. Zions Bancorp NA pays out 41.47% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Pinnacle Financial Partners quarterly revenues are $407.9M, which are smaller than Zions Bancorp NA quarterly revenues of $792M. Pinnacle Financial Partners's net income of $146.7M is lower than Zions Bancorp NA's net income of $214M. Notably, Pinnacle Financial Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 21.94x while Zions Bancorp NA's PE ratio is 12.50x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Pinnacle Financial Partners is 6.22x versus 2.67x for Zions Bancorp NA. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.