ROAD Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Granite Construction has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of 4.25%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.39% beat Granite Construction's return on equity of 12.22%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $104.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.03%. On the other hand Granite Construction has an analysts' consensus of $103.00 which suggests that it could grow by 29.79%. Given that Granite Construction has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Granite Construction is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.790, which suggesting that the stock is 20.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Granite Construction has a beta of 1.343, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 34.258%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Granite Construction offers a yield of 0.66% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction pays out 18.06% of its earnings as a dividend. Granite Construction's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $561.6M, which are smaller than Granite Construction quarterly revenues of $977.3M. Construction Partners's net income of -$3.1M is lower than Granite Construction's net income of $41.5M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 75.33x while Granite Construction's PE ratio is 32.13x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.14x versus 1.00x for Granite Construction. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Southland Holdings has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of -1.56%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.39% beat Southland Holdings's return on equity of -49.21%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $104.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.03%. On the other hand Southland Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $4.50 which suggests that it could grow by 42.41%. Given that Southland Holdings has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Southland Holdings is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.790, which suggesting that the stock is 20.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Southland Holdings has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Southland Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Southland Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $561.6M, which are larger than Southland Holdings quarterly revenues of $267.3M. Construction Partners's net income of -$3.1M is higher than Southland Holdings's net income of -$4.2M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 75.33x while Southland Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.14x versus 0.16x for Southland Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sterling Infrastructure has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of 22.7%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.39% beat Sterling Infrastructure's return on equity of 36.63%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $104.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.03%. On the other hand Sterling Infrastructure has an analysts' consensus of $198.33 which suggests that it could grow by 51.07%. Given that Sterling Infrastructure has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Sterling Infrastructure is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.790, which suggesting that the stock is 20.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sterling Infrastructure has a beta of 1.324, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 32.378%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sterling Infrastructure offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sterling Infrastructure pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $561.6M, which are larger than Sterling Infrastructure quarterly revenues of $498.8M. Construction Partners's net income of -$3.1M is lower than Sterling Infrastructure's net income of $113.2M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 75.33x while Sterling Infrastructure's PE ratio is 15.86x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.14x versus 1.93x for Sterling Infrastructure. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Tutor Perini has a net margin of -0.54% compared to Construction Partners's net margin of -7.44%. Construction Partners's return on equity of 9.39% beat Tutor Perini's return on equity of -13.01%.

Construction Partners has a consensus price target of $104.00, signalling upside risk potential of 29.03%. On the other hand Tutor Perini has an analysts' consensus of $39.50 which suggests that it could grow by 53.88%. Given that Tutor Perini has higher upside potential than Construction Partners, analysts believe Tutor Perini is more attractive than Construction Partners.

Construction Partners has a beta of 0.790, which suggesting that the stock is 20.979% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Tutor Perini has a beta of 1.732, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 73.182%.

Construction Partners has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Tutor Perini offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Construction Partners pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Tutor Perini pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Construction Partners quarterly revenues are $561.6M, which are smaller than Tutor Perini quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Construction Partners's net income of -$3.1M is higher than Tutor Perini's net income of -$79.4M. Notably, Construction Partners's price-to-earnings ratio is 75.33x while Tutor Perini's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Construction Partners is 2.14x versus 0.31x for Tutor Perini. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.