ROKU Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

The Walt Disney has a net margin of -0.85% compared to Roku's net margin of 2.04%. Roku's return on equity of -7.27% beat The Walt Disney's return on equity of 4.66%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling downside risk potential of -2.34%. On the other hand The Walt Disney has an analysts' consensus of $122.66 which suggests that it could grow by 9.49%. Given that The Walt Disney has higher upside potential than Roku, analysts believe The Walt Disney is more attractive than Roku.

Roku has a beta of 2.060, which suggesting that the stock is 106.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Walt Disney has a beta of 1.422, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 42.18%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Walt Disney offers a yield of 0.85% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney pays out 27.47% of its earnings as a dividend. The Walt Disney's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than The Walt Disney quarterly revenues of $22.6B. Roku's net income of -$9M is lower than The Walt Disney's net income of $460M. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while The Walt Disney's PE ratio is 41.34x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 2.98x versus 2.24x for The Walt Disney. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Alphabet has a net margin of -0.85% compared to Roku's net margin of 29.8%. Roku's return on equity of -7.27% beat Alphabet's return on equity of 32.19%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling downside risk potential of -2.34%. On the other hand Alphabet has an analysts' consensus of $211.12 which suggests that it could grow by 10.3%. Given that Alphabet has higher upside potential than Roku, analysts believe Alphabet is more attractive than Roku.

Roku has a beta of 2.060, which suggesting that the stock is 106.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Alphabet has a beta of 1.011, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.097%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Alphabet offers a yield of 0.31% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Alphabet pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Alphabet quarterly revenues of $88.3B. Roku's net income of -$9M is lower than Alphabet's net income of $26.3B. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Alphabet's PE ratio is 25.39x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 2.98x versus 7.17x for Alphabet. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Netflix has a net margin of -0.85% compared to Roku's net margin of 24.06%. Roku's return on equity of -7.27% beat Netflix's return on equity of 35.73%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling downside risk potential of -2.34%. On the other hand Netflix has an analysts' consensus of $832.51 which suggests that it could fall by -8.42%. Given that Netflix has more downside risk than Roku, analysts believe Roku is more attractive than Netflix.

Roku has a beta of 2.060, which suggesting that the stock is 106.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Netflix has a beta of 1.270, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 26.982%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Netflix offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Netflix pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Netflix quarterly revenues of $9.8B. Roku's net income of -$9M is lower than Netflix's net income of $2.4B. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Netflix's PE ratio is 51.45x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 2.98x versus 10.66x for Netflix. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sirius XM Holdings has a net margin of -0.85% compared to Roku's net margin of -113.13%. Roku's return on equity of -7.27% beat Sirius XM Holdings's return on equity of -670.48%.

Roku has a consensus price target of $81.40, signalling downside risk potential of -2.34%. On the other hand Sirius XM Holdings has an analysts' consensus of $25.54 which suggests that it could grow by 10.63%. Given that Sirius XM Holdings has higher upside potential than Roku, analysts believe Sirius XM Holdings is more attractive than Roku.

Roku has a beta of 2.060, which suggesting that the stock is 106.018% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sirius XM Holdings has a beta of 1.033, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.25%.

Roku has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sirius XM Holdings offers a yield of 4.63% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.27 per share. Roku pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sirius XM Holdings pays out 30.45% of its earnings as a dividend. Sirius XM Holdings's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Roku quarterly revenues are $1.1B, which are smaller than Sirius XM Holdings quarterly revenues of $2.2B. Roku's net income of -$9M is higher than Sirius XM Holdings's net income of -$2.5B. Notably, Roku's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Sirius XM Holdings's PE ratio is 10.60x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Roku is 2.98x versus 1.07x for Sirius XM Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.