RRR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Boyd Gaming has a net margin of 9.4% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of 16.38%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 64.1% beat Boyd Gaming's return on equity of 34.3%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $56.75, signalling upside risk potential of 26%. On the other hand Boyd Gaming has an analysts' consensus of $84.64 which suggests that it could grow by 23.58%. Given that Red Rock Resorts has higher upside potential than Boyd Gaming, analysts believe Red Rock Resorts is more attractive than Boyd Gaming.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 2.012, which suggesting that the stock is 101.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Boyd Gaming has a beta of 1.553, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 55.28%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Boyd Gaming offers a yield of 0.99% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.18 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Boyd Gaming pays out 10.84% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $495.7M, which are smaller than Boyd Gaming quarterly revenues of $1B. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $46.6M is lower than Boyd Gaming's net income of $170.5M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.94x while Boyd Gaming's PE ratio is 11.01x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.16x versus 1.63x for Boyd Gaming. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

DraftKings has a net margin of 9.4% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of -9.68%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 64.1% beat DraftKings's return on equity of -50.16%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $56.75, signalling upside risk potential of 26%. On the other hand DraftKings has an analysts' consensus of $57.77 which suggests that it could grow by 52.55%. Given that DraftKings has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe DraftKings is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 2.012, which suggesting that the stock is 101.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison DraftKings has a beta of 2.074, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.446%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. DraftKings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. DraftKings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $495.7M, which are smaller than DraftKings quarterly revenues of $1.4B. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $46.6M is higher than DraftKings's net income of -$134.9M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.94x while DraftKings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.16x versus 3.91x for DraftKings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Full House Resorts has a net margin of 9.4% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of -16.86%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 64.1% beat Full House Resorts's return on equity of -68.49%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $56.75, signalling upside risk potential of 26%. On the other hand Full House Resorts has an analysts' consensus of $5.63 which suggests that it could grow by 39.75%. Given that Full House Resorts has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe Full House Resorts is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 2.012, which suggesting that the stock is 101.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Full House Resorts has a beta of 1.983, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 98.264%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Full House Resorts offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Full House Resorts pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend. Red Rock Resorts's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $495.7M, which are larger than Full House Resorts quarterly revenues of $73M. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $46.6M is higher than Full House Resorts's net income of -$12.3M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.94x while Full House Resorts's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.16x versus 0.48x for Full House Resorts. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Golden Entertainment has a net margin of 9.4% compared to Red Rock Resorts's net margin of 1.81%. Red Rock Resorts's return on equity of 64.1% beat Golden Entertainment's return on equity of 9.63%.

Red Rock Resorts has a consensus price target of $56.75, signalling upside risk potential of 26%. On the other hand Golden Entertainment has an analysts' consensus of $36.86 which suggests that it could grow by 40.84%. Given that Golden Entertainment has higher upside potential than Red Rock Resorts, analysts believe Golden Entertainment is more attractive than Red Rock Resorts.

Red Rock Resorts has a beta of 2.012, which suggesting that the stock is 101.211% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Golden Entertainment has a beta of 2.288, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 128.754%.

Red Rock Resorts has a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share corresponding to a yield of 2.22%. Golden Entertainment offers a yield of 3.82% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.25 per share. Red Rock Resorts pays 76.86% of its earnings as a dividend. Golden Entertainment pays out 42% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Red Rock Resorts quarterly revenues are $495.7M, which are larger than Golden Entertainment quarterly revenues of $164.2M. Red Rock Resorts's net income of $46.6M is higher than Golden Entertainment's net income of $3M. Notably, Red Rock Resorts's price-to-earnings ratio is 17.94x while Golden Entertainment's PE ratio is 15.67x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Red Rock Resorts is 2.16x versus 1.16x for Golden Entertainment. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.