SANM Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Jabil has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 1.43%. Sanmina's return on equity of 9.58% beat Jabil's return on equity of 59.91%.

Sanmina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -13.02%. On the other hand Jabil has an analysts' consensus of $161.25 which suggests that it could grow by 9.22%. Given that Jabil has higher upside potential than Sanmina, analysts believe Jabil is more attractive than Sanmina.

Sanmina has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Jabil has a beta of 1.251, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 25.128%.

Sanmina has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Jabil offers a yield of 0.22% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.08 per share. Sanmina pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil pays out 3.03% of its earnings as a dividend. Jabil's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Sanmina quarterly revenues are $2B, which are smaller than Jabil quarterly revenues of $7B. Sanmina's net income of $61.4M is lower than Jabil's net income of $100M. Notably, Sanmina's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.99x while Jabil's PE ratio is 14.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sanmina is 0.59x versus 0.64x for Jabil. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Plexus has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 3.92%. Sanmina's return on equity of 9.58% beat Plexus's return on equity of 8.83%.

Sanmina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -13.02%. On the other hand Plexus has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by -7.08%. Given that Sanmina has more downside risk than Plexus, analysts believe Plexus is more attractive than Sanmina.

Sanmina has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Plexus has a beta of 0.899, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 10.064%.

Sanmina has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Plexus offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sanmina pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Plexus pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sanmina quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Plexus quarterly revenues of $1.1B. Sanmina's net income of $61.4M is higher than Plexus's net income of $41.2M. Notably, Sanmina's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.99x while Plexus's PE ratio is 40.31x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sanmina is 0.59x versus 1.14x for Plexus. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Sigmatron International has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Sanmina's net margin of -12.67%. Sanmina's return on equity of 9.58% beat Sigmatron International's return on equity of -24.24%.

Sanmina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -13.02%. On the other hand Sigmatron International has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Sanmina has higher upside potential than Sigmatron International, analysts believe Sanmina is more attractive than Sigmatron International.

Sanmina has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Sigmatron International has a beta of 0.863, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.704%.

Sanmina has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Sigmatron International offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sanmina pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Sigmatron International pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sanmina quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than Sigmatron International quarterly revenues of $74.7M. Sanmina's net income of $61.4M is higher than Sigmatron International's net income of -$9.5M. Notably, Sanmina's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.99x while Sigmatron International's PE ratio is 21.40x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sanmina is 0.59x versus 0.03x for Sigmatron International. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

TTM Technologies has a net margin of 3.04% compared to Sanmina's net margin of 2.32%. Sanmina's return on equity of 9.58% beat TTM Technologies's return on equity of 4.5%.

Sanmina has a consensus price target of --, signalling downside risk potential of -13.02%. On the other hand TTM Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 14.08%. Given that TTM Technologies has higher upside potential than Sanmina, analysts believe TTM Technologies is more attractive than Sanmina.

Sanmina has a beta of 0.912, which suggesting that the stock is 8.788% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TTM Technologies has a beta of 1.212, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 21.174%.

Sanmina has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TTM Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Sanmina pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TTM Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Sanmina quarterly revenues are $2B, which are larger than TTM Technologies quarterly revenues of $616.5M. Sanmina's net income of $61.4M is higher than TTM Technologies's net income of $14.3M. Notably, Sanmina's price-to-earnings ratio is 19.99x while TTM Technologies's PE ratio is 38.85x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Sanmina is 0.59x versus 1.12x for TTM Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.