SBAC Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Crown Castle has a net margin of 38.73% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 18.34%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Crown Castle's return on equity of 20.44%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $258.13, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Crown Castle has an analysts' consensus of $117.47 which suggests that it could grow by 29.57%. Given that Crown Castle has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Crown Castle is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Crown Castle has a beta of 0.857, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 14.29%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Crown Castle offers a yield of 6.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $1.57 per share. SBA Communications pays 73.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Crown Castle pays out 181.29% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Crown Castle's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $667.6M, which are smaller than Crown Castle quarterly revenues of $1.7B. SBA Communications's net income of $258.5M is lower than Crown Castle's net income of $303M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.11x while Crown Castle's PE ratio is 32.15x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 8.28x versus 5.98x for Crown Castle. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Healthpeak Properties has a net margin of 38.73% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 12.52%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Healthpeak Properties's return on equity of 3.67%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $258.13, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Healthpeak Properties has an analysts' consensus of $25.50 which suggests that it could grow by 26.74%. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than Healthpeak Properties, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than Healthpeak Properties.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Healthpeak Properties has a beta of 1.132, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.155%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Healthpeak Properties offers a yield of 5.96% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.30 per share. SBA Communications pays 73.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Healthpeak Properties pays out 214.71% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Healthpeak Properties's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $667.6M, which are smaller than Healthpeak Properties quarterly revenues of $686.1M. SBA Communications's net income of $258.5M is higher than Healthpeak Properties's net income of $85.9M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.11x while Healthpeak Properties's PE ratio is 42.81x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 8.28x versus 5.08x for Healthpeak Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

VICI Properties has a net margin of 38.73% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 75.97%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat VICI Properties's return on equity of 10.93%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $258.13, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand VICI Properties has an analysts' consensus of $35.82 which suggests that it could grow by 24.4%. Given that SBA Communications has higher upside potential than VICI Properties, analysts believe SBA Communications is more attractive than VICI Properties.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison VICI Properties has a beta of 0.930, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 6.963%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. VICI Properties offers a yield of 5.89% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.43 per share. SBA Communications pays 73.73% of its earnings as a dividend. VICI Properties pays out 63.01% of its earnings as a dividend. Both of these payout ratios are sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $667.6M, which are smaller than VICI Properties quarterly revenues of $964.7M. SBA Communications's net income of $258.5M is lower than VICI Properties's net income of $732.9M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.11x while VICI Properties's PE ratio is 10.66x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 8.28x versus 7.89x for VICI Properties. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Weyerhaeuser has a net margin of 38.73% compared to SBA Communications's net margin of 1.67%. SBA Communications's return on equity of -- beat Weyerhaeuser's return on equity of 5.29%.

SBA Communications has a consensus price target of $258.13, signalling upside risk potential of 26.8%. On the other hand Weyerhaeuser has an analysts' consensus of $36.80 which suggests that it could grow by 33.82%. Given that Weyerhaeuser has higher upside potential than SBA Communications, analysts believe Weyerhaeuser is more attractive than SBA Communications.

SBA Communications has a beta of 0.669, which suggesting that the stock is 33.079% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Weyerhaeuser has a beta of 1.407, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 40.678%.

SBA Communications has a quarterly dividend of $0.98 per share corresponding to a yield of 1.93%. Weyerhaeuser offers a yield of 2.91% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.20 per share. SBA Communications pays 73.73% of its earnings as a dividend. Weyerhaeuser pays out 144.93% of its earnings as a dividend. SBA Communications's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future, but Weyerhaeuser's is not.

SBA Communications quarterly revenues are $667.6M, which are smaller than Weyerhaeuser quarterly revenues of $1.7B. SBA Communications's net income of $258.5M is higher than Weyerhaeuser's net income of $28M. Notably, SBA Communications's price-to-earnings ratio is 32.11x while Weyerhaeuser's PE ratio is 37.16x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for SBA Communications is 8.28x versus 2.79x for Weyerhaeuser. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.