SCWO Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Bion Environmental Technologies has a net margin of -3315.52% compared to 374Water's net margin of --. 374Water's return on equity of -83.56% beat Bion Environmental Technologies's return on equity of --.

374Water has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 235.48%. On the other hand Bion Environmental Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 1566.67%. Given that Bion Environmental Technologies has higher upside potential than 374Water, analysts believe Bion Environmental Technologies is more attractive than 374Water.

374Water has a beta of -0.577, which suggesting that the stock is 157.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Bion Environmental Technologies has a beta of -0.122, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 112.193%.

374Water has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Bion Environmental Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 374Water pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Bion Environmental Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

374Water quarterly revenues are $81.5K, which are larger than Bion Environmental Technologies quarterly revenues of --. 374Water's net income of -$2.7M is lower than Bion Environmental Technologies's net income of -$1.2M. Notably, 374Water's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Bion Environmental Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 374Water is 315.24x versus -- for Bion Environmental Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Go Green Global Technologies has a net margin of -3315.52% compared to 374Water's net margin of --. 374Water's return on equity of -83.56% beat Go Green Global Technologies's return on equity of --.

374Water has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 235.48%. On the other hand Go Green Global Technologies has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 374Water has higher upside potential than Go Green Global Technologies, analysts believe 374Water is more attractive than Go Green Global Technologies.

374Water has a beta of -0.577, which suggesting that the stock is 157.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Go Green Global Technologies has a beta of 0.981, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.888%.

374Water has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Go Green Global Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 374Water pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Go Green Global Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

374Water quarterly revenues are $81.5K, which are larger than Go Green Global Technologies quarterly revenues of --. 374Water's net income of -$2.7M is higher than Go Green Global Technologies's net income of --. Notably, 374Water's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Go Green Global Technologies's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 374Water is 315.24x versus -- for Go Green Global Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Veralto has a net margin of -3315.52% compared to 374Water's net margin of 16.67%. 374Water's return on equity of -83.56% beat Veralto's return on equity of 53.36%.

374Water has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 235.48%. On the other hand Veralto has an analysts' consensus of $116.21 which suggests that it could grow by 11.47%. Given that 374Water has higher upside potential than Veralto, analysts believe 374Water is more attractive than Veralto.

374Water has a beta of -0.577, which suggesting that the stock is 157.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Veralto has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

374Water has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Veralto offers a yield of 0.35% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.09 per share. 374Water pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Veralto pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

374Water quarterly revenues are $81.5K, which are smaller than Veralto quarterly revenues of $1.3B. 374Water's net income of -$2.7M is lower than Veralto's net income of $219M. Notably, 374Water's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Veralto's PE ratio is 32.18x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 374Water is 315.24x versus 5.06x for Veralto. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

CleanCore Solutions has a net margin of -3315.52% compared to 374Water's net margin of --. 374Water's return on equity of -83.56% beat CleanCore Solutions's return on equity of --.

374Water has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 235.48%. On the other hand CleanCore Solutions has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that 374Water has higher upside potential than CleanCore Solutions, analysts believe 374Water is more attractive than CleanCore Solutions.

374Water has a beta of -0.577, which suggesting that the stock is 157.739% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison CleanCore Solutions has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.

374Water has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. CleanCore Solutions offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. 374Water pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. CleanCore Solutions pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

374Water quarterly revenues are $81.5K, which are larger than CleanCore Solutions quarterly revenues of --. 374Water's net income of -$2.7M is higher than CleanCore Solutions's net income of --. Notably, 374Water's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while CleanCore Solutions's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for 374Water is 315.24x versus 3.49x for CleanCore Solutions. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.