Why Caesars’ Digital Arm May Be the Gaming Giant’s Best-Kept Secret
It’s not often that a company with the scale and…
Sell
50
SEAT Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings
Last price:
$3.37
Seasonality move
:
-1.63%
Day range:
$3.36 - $3.59
52-week range:
$3.24 - $6.52
Dividend yield:
0%
P/E ratio:
16.64x
P/S ratio:
0.86x
P/B ratio:
1.40x
Volume:
1.6M
Avg. volume:
1.5M
1-year change:
-44.64%
Market cap:
$461.6M
Revenue:
$712.9M
EPS (TTM):
$0.21
Price Performance History
Performance vs. Valuation Benchmarks
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Competitors
| Company | Revenue Forecast | Earnings Forecast | Revenue Growth Forecast | Earnings Growth Forecast | Analyst Price Target Median |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEAT
Vivid Seats
|
$185.5M | $0.04 | -2.27% | -62.47% | $5.62 |
|
AREN
The Arena Group Holdings
|
$56M | -$0.41 | -- | -- | -- |
|
DGLY
Digital Ally
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
MTCH
Match Group
|
$900.9M | $0.79 | -0.17% | 4.23% | $36.69 |
|
TTGT
TechTarget
|
-- | -- | -- | -- | -- |
|
ZG
Zillow Group
|
$555.2M | $0.29 | 13.56% | -- | $77.84 |
| Company | Price | Analyst Target | Market Cap | P/E Ratio | Dividend per Share | Dividend Yield | Price / LTM Sales |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEAT
Vivid Seats
|
$3.51 | $5.62 | $461.6M | 16.64x | $0.00 | 0% | 0.86x |
|
AREN
The Arena Group Holdings
|
$1.41 | -- | $66.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.18x |
|
DGLY
Digital Ally
|
$0.48 | -- | $1.9M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 0.06x |
|
MTCH
Match Group
|
$33.76 | $36.69 | $8.5B | 15.07x | $0.00 | 0% | 2.70x |
|
TTGT
TechTarget
|
$19.55 | -- | $582.6M | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 2.48x |
|
ZG
Zillow Group
|
$73.80 | $77.84 | $17.2B | -- | $0.00 | 0% | 7.94x |
| Company | Total Debt / Total Capital | Beta | Debt to Equity | Quick Ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEAT
Vivid Seats
|
54.19% | 0.122 | 50.72% | 0.65x |
|
AREN
The Arena Group Holdings
|
-429.27% | 9.858 | 291.93% | 0.13x |
|
DGLY
Digital Ally
|
82.04% | 3.057 | 115.76% | 0.20x |
|
MTCH
Match Group
|
102.36% | 0.608 | 40.04% | 2.26x |
|
TTGT
TechTarget
|
62.29% | 1.515 | -- | 10.25x |
|
ZG
Zillow Group
|
18.59% | 3.448 | 7.35% | 2.68x |
| Company | Gross Profit | Operating Income | Return on Invested Capital | Return on Common Equity | EBIT Margin | Free Cash Flow |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
SEAT
Vivid Seats
|
$135.6M | $10.8M | 3.93% | 6.06% | 10.6% | -$24.5M |
|
AREN
The Arena Group Holdings
|
$17M | $8.1M | -1245.37% | -- | 23.77% | -$3.7M |
|
DGLY
Digital Ally
|
$242.4K | -$3.9M | -102% | -159.44% | -69.9% | -$2.5M |
|
MTCH
Match Group
|
$642.4M | $252.8M | 16.76% | -- | 24.32% | $251.8M |
|
TTGT
TechTarget
|
$36.5M | $797K | -1.89% | -5.3% | 1.36% | $15.6M |
|
ZG
Zillow Group
|
$441M | -$44M | -2.16% | -2.91% | -1.89% | $131M |
Vivid Seats vs. Competitors
-
Which has Higher Returns SEAT or AREN?
The Arena Group Holdings has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Vivid Seats's net margin of 11.79%. Vivid Seats's return on equity of 6.06% beat The Arena Group Holdings's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEATVivid Seats72.65% $0.04 $1B ARENThe Arena Group Holdings50.64% $0.11 -$26M -
What do Analysts Say About SEAT or AREN?
Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 60.14%. On the other hand The Arena Group Holdings has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 680.14%. Given that The Arena Group Holdings has higher upside potential than Vivid Seats, analysts believe The Arena Group Holdings is more attractive than Vivid Seats.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEATVivid Seats7 4 0 ARENThe Arena Group Holdings0 0 0 -
Is SEAT or AREN More Risky?
Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison The Arena Group Holdings has a beta of 0.469, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 53.132%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEAT or AREN?
Vivid Seats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. The Arena Group Holdings offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivid Seats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. The Arena Group Holdings pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEAT or AREN?
Vivid Seats quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than The Arena Group Holdings quarterly revenues of $33.6M. Vivid Seats's net income of $5.3M is higher than The Arena Group Holdings's net income of $4M. Notably, Vivid Seats's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.64x while The Arena Group Holdings's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivid Seats is 0.86x versus 0.18x for The Arena Group Holdings. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEATVivid Seats0.86x 16.64x $186.6M $5.3M ARENThe Arena Group Holdings0.18x -- $33.6M $4M
-
Which has Higher Returns SEAT or DGLY?
Digital Ally has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Vivid Seats's net margin of -90.52%. Vivid Seats's return on equity of 6.06% beat Digital Ally's return on equity of -159.44%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEATVivid Seats72.65% $0.04 $1B DGLYDigital Ally4.32% -$1.74 $13.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SEAT or DGLY?
Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 60.14%. On the other hand Digital Ally has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 2191.67%. Given that Digital Ally has higher upside potential than Vivid Seats, analysts believe Digital Ally is more attractive than Vivid Seats.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEATVivid Seats7 4 0 DGLYDigital Ally0 0 0 -
Is SEAT or DGLY More Risky?
Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Digital Ally has a beta of 0.822, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 17.843%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEAT or DGLY?
Vivid Seats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Digital Ally offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivid Seats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Digital Ally pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEAT or DGLY?
Vivid Seats quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than Digital Ally quarterly revenues of $5.6M. Vivid Seats's net income of $5.3M is higher than Digital Ally's net income of -$5.1M. Notably, Vivid Seats's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.64x while Digital Ally's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivid Seats is 0.86x versus 0.06x for Digital Ally. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEATVivid Seats0.86x 16.64x $186.6M $5.3M DGLYDigital Ally0.06x -- $5.6M -$5.1M
-
Which has Higher Returns SEAT or MTCH?
Match Group has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Vivid Seats's net margin of 15.24%. Vivid Seats's return on equity of 6.06% beat Match Group's return on equity of --.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEATVivid Seats72.65% $0.04 $1B MTCHMatch Group71.73% $0.51 $3.8B -
What do Analysts Say About SEAT or MTCH?
Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 60.14%. On the other hand Match Group has an analysts' consensus of $36.69 which suggests that it could grow by 8.67%. Given that Vivid Seats has higher upside potential than Match Group, analysts believe Vivid Seats is more attractive than Match Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEATVivid Seats7 4 0 MTCHMatch Group9 14 0 -
Is SEAT or MTCH More Risky?
Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Match Group has a beta of 0.000, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 100%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEAT or MTCH?
Vivid Seats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Match Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivid Seats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Match Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEAT or MTCH?
Vivid Seats quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are smaller than Match Group quarterly revenues of $895.5M. Vivid Seats's net income of $5.3M is lower than Match Group's net income of $136.5M. Notably, Vivid Seats's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.64x while Match Group's PE ratio is 15.07x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivid Seats is 0.86x versus 2.70x for Match Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEATVivid Seats0.86x 16.64x $186.6M $5.3M MTCHMatch Group2.70x 15.07x $895.5M $136.5M
-
Which has Higher Returns SEAT or TTGT?
TechTarget has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Vivid Seats's net margin of -2.94%. Vivid Seats's return on equity of 6.06% beat TechTarget's return on equity of -5.3%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEATVivid Seats72.65% $0.04 $1B TTGTTechTarget62.34% -$0.06 $661.6M -
What do Analysts Say About SEAT or TTGT?
Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 60.14%. On the other hand TechTarget has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could fall by --. Given that Vivid Seats has higher upside potential than TechTarget, analysts believe Vivid Seats is more attractive than TechTarget.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEATVivid Seats7 4 0 TTGTTechTarget0 0 0 -
Is SEAT or TTGT More Risky?
Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison TechTarget has a beta of 1.040, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 3.965%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEAT or TTGT?
Vivid Seats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. TechTarget offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivid Seats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. TechTarget pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEAT or TTGT?
Vivid Seats quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are larger than TechTarget quarterly revenues of $58.5M. Vivid Seats's net income of $5.3M is higher than TechTarget's net income of -$1.7M. Notably, Vivid Seats's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.64x while TechTarget's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivid Seats is 0.86x versus 2.48x for TechTarget. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEATVivid Seats0.86x 16.64x $186.6M $5.3M TTGTTechTarget2.48x -- $58.5M -$1.7M
-
Which has Higher Returns SEAT or ZG?
Zillow Group has a net margin of 2.84% compared to Vivid Seats's net margin of -3.44%. Vivid Seats's return on equity of 6.06% beat Zillow Group's return on equity of -2.91%.
Company Gross Margin Earnings Per Share Invested Capital SEATVivid Seats72.65% $0.04 $1B ZGZillow Group75.9% -$0.08 $5.7B -
What do Analysts Say About SEAT or ZG?
Vivid Seats has a consensus price target of $5.62, signalling upside risk potential of 60.14%. On the other hand Zillow Group has an analysts' consensus of $77.84 which suggests that it could grow by 4.65%. Given that Vivid Seats has higher upside potential than Zillow Group, analysts believe Vivid Seats is more attractive than Zillow Group.
Company Buy Ratings Hold Ratings Sell Ratings SEATVivid Seats7 4 0 ZGZillow Group10 11 0 -
Is SEAT or ZG More Risky?
Vivid Seats has a beta of 0.000, which suggesting that the stock is 100% less volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Zillow Group has a beta of 2.079, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 107.852%.
-
Which is a Better Dividend Stock SEAT or ZG?
Vivid Seats has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Zillow Group offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Vivid Seats pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Zillow Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.
-
Which has Better Financial Ratios SEAT or ZG?
Vivid Seats quarterly revenues are $186.6M, which are smaller than Zillow Group quarterly revenues of $581M. Vivid Seats's net income of $5.3M is higher than Zillow Group's net income of -$20M. Notably, Vivid Seats's price-to-earnings ratio is 16.64x while Zillow Group's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Vivid Seats is 0.86x versus 7.94x for Zillow Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.
Company Price/Sales Ratio Price/Earnings Ratio Quarterly Revenue Quarterly Net Income SEATVivid Seats0.86x 16.64x $186.6M $5.3M ZGZillow Group7.94x -- $581M -$20M
SEE THE 1% OF STOCKS YOU NEED TO OWN FOR MASSIVE RETURNS
GET BETTER TRADE IDEAS
Popular
Will Tyson Foods Stock Bounce Back?
Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) is one of the biggest food…
Will Iovance Biotherapeutics Stock Bounce Back?
Iovance Biotherapeutics (NASDAQ:IOVA) is a fledgling pharmaceutical company that specializes…
Stock Ideas
Buy
64
Is AAPL Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.8T
P/E Ratio: 42x
Buy
52
Is NVDA Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.3T
P/E Ratio: 113x
Buy
55
Is MSFT Stock a Buy?
Market Cap: $3.2T
P/E Ratio: 37x
Alerts
Buy
61
QMCO alert for Dec 23
Quantum [QMCO] is up 3.25% over the past day.
Sell
46
NUKK alert for Dec 23
Nukkleus [NUKK] is up 6.6% over the past day.
Sell
1
IIPR alert for Dec 23
Innovative Industrial Properties [IIPR] is down 5.78% over the past day.
