SGLY Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a net margin of -191.82% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of 2.09%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -36.46% beat C.H. Robinson Worldwide's return on equity of 23.46%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 469.25%. On the other hand C.H. Robinson Worldwide has an analysts' consensus of $113.99 which suggests that it could grow by 9.25%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than C.H. Robinson Worldwide, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than C.H. Robinson Worldwide.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison C.H. Robinson Worldwide has a beta of 0.832, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 16.81%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. C.H. Robinson Worldwide offers a yield of 2.36% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.62 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide pays out 89.68% of its earnings as a dividend. C.H. Robinson Worldwide's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $501.4K, which are smaller than C.H. Robinson Worldwide quarterly revenues of $4.6B. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$961.8K is lower than C.H. Robinson Worldwide's net income of $97.2M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while C.H. Robinson Worldwide's PE ratio is 36.10x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.64x versus 0.71x for C.H. Robinson Worldwide. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Forward Air has a net margin of -191.82% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of -11.19%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -36.46% beat Forward Air's return on equity of -98.01%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 469.25%. On the other hand Forward Air has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 22.7%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Forward Air, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Forward Air.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Forward Air has a beta of 1.017, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 1.748%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Forward Air offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.24 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air pays out 14.94% of its earnings as a dividend. Forward Air's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $501.4K, which are smaller than Forward Air quarterly revenues of $655.9M. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$961.8K is higher than Forward Air's net income of -$73.4M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Forward Air's PE ratio is 10.62x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.64x versus 0.35x for Forward Air. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Hub Group has a net margin of -191.82% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of 2.39%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -36.46% beat Hub Group's return on equity of 6.65%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 469.25%. On the other hand Hub Group has an analysts' consensus of $48.13 which suggests that it could grow by 11.58%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Hub Group, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Hub Group.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Hub Group has a beta of 0.916, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.408%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Hub Group offers a yield of 1.16% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.13 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Hub Group pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $501.4K, which are smaller than Hub Group quarterly revenues of $986.9M. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$961.8K is lower than Hub Group's net income of $23.6M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Hub Group's PE ratio is 24.51x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.64x versus 0.67x for Hub Group. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Radiant Logistics has a net margin of -191.82% compared to Singularity Future Technology's net margin of 1.66%. Singularity Future Technology's return on equity of -36.46% beat Radiant Logistics's return on equity of 4.05%.

Singularity Future Technology has a consensus price target of --, signalling upside risk potential of 469.25%. On the other hand Radiant Logistics has an analysts' consensus of -- which suggests that it could grow by 41.63%. Given that Singularity Future Technology has higher upside potential than Radiant Logistics, analysts believe Singularity Future Technology is more attractive than Radiant Logistics.

Singularity Future Technology has a beta of 1.032, which suggesting that the stock is 3.188% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Radiant Logistics has a beta of 0.862, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 13.776%.

Singularity Future Technology has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Radiant Logistics offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Singularity Future Technology pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Radiant Logistics pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Singularity Future Technology quarterly revenues are $501.4K, which are smaller than Radiant Logistics quarterly revenues of $203.6M. Singularity Future Technology's net income of -$961.8K is lower than Radiant Logistics's net income of $3.4M. Notably, Singularity Future Technology's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Radiant Logistics's PE ratio is 38.76x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Singularity Future Technology is 1.64x versus 0.40x for Radiant Logistics. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.